Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#38 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-57% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 VULCANIA
IMO 9718686
82,036 2015
1.4
A
2 BO MAY
IMO 9980186
181,500 2019
1.6
A
3 SAO OASIS
IMO 9840465
324,690 2021
1.6
A
4 SAO PEARL
IMO 9840477
324,690 2021
1.6
A
5 SAO UNISON
IMO 9841380
324,690 2022
1.6
A
6 SHANDONG DE YUN
IMO 9872080
180,620 2020
1.7
A
7 ORE SHANTOU
IMO 9847542
324,983 2020
1.7
A
9 GARGANTUA
IMO 9712682
209,529 2013
1.8
A
8 GCL THAMES
IMO 9966221
182,334 2023
1.8
A
10 HENG MAY
IMO 9980174
181,500 2019
1.8
A
11 SM GEMINI1
IMO 9841586
324,972 2020
1.8
A
12 MOUNT ELBRUS
IMO 9945667
208,479 2021
1.8
A
13 NORD STEEL
IMO 9966233
182,288 2019
1.9
A
15 FJ ROSSA
IMO 9921611
182,345 2022
1.9
A
14 BERGE CAUBVICK
IMO 9335848
229,045 2006
1.9
A
16 GOLDEN SWIFT
IMO 9702481
211,135 2013
1.9
A
17 SAMJOHN ARGONAUT
IMO 9745938
209,756 2014
1.9
A
19 SPRING HARMONY
IMO 9983578
182,498 2024
1.9
A
18 LAVINIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9691931
207,562 2014
1.9
A
20 SAO JOY
IMO 9824069
324,690 2020
1.9
A
21 GRAND SAKURA
IMO 9913949
181,924 2021
1.9
A
22 BOKM TIANJIN
IMO 9908607
324,922 2022
2.0
A
23 CAPE OLYMPIA
IMO 9860491
183,057 2020
2.0
A
24 SHINWA-MARU
IMO 9325295
297,541 2008
2.0
A
25 HELGA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9713040
209,171 2013
2.0
A
26 NAVIOS ALTAIR
IMO 9933092
182,115 2023
2.0
A
27 KSL SALVADOR
IMO 9683271
180,958 2012
2.0
A
28 GOODSHIP
IMO 9311476
177,536 2005
2.0
A
31 ARIADNE
IMO 9721877
207,520 2016
2.0
A
30 CAPE PLEASURE
IMO 9960124
182,096 2024
2.0
A
29 XH NINGBO
IMO 9948126
210,102 2023
2.0
A
32 ALPHA GALLANT
IMO 9747871
181,162 2013
2.0
A
33 CAPE OWL
IMO 9729219
179,510 2016
2.0
A
34 HEDWIG OLDENDORFF
IMO 9742728
209,240 2013
2.1
A
35 FRIEDRICH OLDENDORFF
IMO 9889265
208,822 2020
2.1
A
37 CAPE SUN
IMO 9953573
182,436 2023
2.1
A
36 SHANDONG CIVILIZATION
IMO 9926415
210,963 2022
2.1
A
38 CAPE KESTREL
IMO 9767510
181,267 2016
2.1
A
39 SHANDONG FU YI
IMO 9748801
81,784 2019
2.1
A
40 AWAJISAN MARU
IMO 9906805
181,994 2021
2.1
A
41 CAPE ELIANTO
IMO 9938602
182,328 2022
2.1
A
42 ORIENTAL EXPRESS
IMO 9346366
180,211 2006
2.1
A
43 FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9410454
176,948 2009
2.1
A
47 HT HUA SHAN
IMO 9468188
176,827 2009
2.1
A
46 BERGE MAWSON
IMO 9738868
181,160 2015
2.1
A
45 TRUE CHARIOT
IMO 9726774
182,571 2013
2.1
A
44 CAPE MERCURY
IMO 9943827
209,963 2023
2.1
A
48 SHANDONG NEW ERA
IMO 9910753
207,999 2022
2.2
A
50 NAVIOS AMETHYST
IMO 9960148
182,212 2023
2.2
A
49 AQUAJOY
IMO 9951111
182,082 2023
2.2
A
Page 1 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.