Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker
TrustedDocks · Market Data

Damage & Repair Demand

Marine casualties as actionable repair demand: what is damaged, where the vessel is, and the likely repair scope — assessed, not just reported. Covers collisions, groundings, fires, machinery and structural casualties across our sources.

9
Currently seeking repair
casualty within 60 days · still down
81
New casualties · 30 days
3 major · 13 machinery
9,226
Casualties assessed
20.5% with a full damage assessment

Vessels currently seeking repair

Ordered by repair urgency. State is as of each vessel's last AIS observation, not real time. Analytical estimates over reported incident data — not surveys, asserting nothing about cause, fault or liability.

VesselCasualtyAssessed damageStatusUrgency
IMO 9247431 · Tanker · Cameroon
2026-08-07
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.34
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9297096 · — · Barbados
2026-08-07
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.34
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9616072 · — · Panama
2026-07-22
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.16
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9583122 · Bulk Carriers · Liberia
2026-06-27
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.16
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 7724265 · Passenger Ferry Roro · GREECE
2026-07-21
position pending
Major structural Med · 0.68
hull plating and welding
Why this assessment
Assessed as major structural because: bow damage reported. est. 21–180 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.
Immobilised
still down
Next port
IMO 9185293 · Container · The Commonwealth of the Bahamas
2026-08-12
position pending
Machinery casualty Med · 0.56
electrical
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: aux engine damage reported. est. 2–45 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.
Immobilised
still down
Next port
IMO 9387669 · Container · PANAMA
2026-07-31
position pending
Minor damage High · 0.72
accommodation_outfitting
Why this assessment
Assessed as minor damage because: accommodation damage reported + superstructure damage reported. est. 1–30 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.
In repair
still down
Next drydock
IMO 9964637 · — · PORTUGAL (MAR)
2026-07-21
position pending
Minor damage Med · 0.68
accommodation_outfitting
Why this assessment
Assessed as minor damage because: accommodation damage reported. est. 1–30 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.
Immobilised
still down
Next drydock

1 more vessels currently seeking repair, with candidate-yard matching and alerts.

Sign in to see all 9

Candidate yards (dimensional fit + demonstrated repair experience) ship with the yard-matching release. Coverage is US-skewed today and widening to global — stated in full under Coverage & methodology.

Recent casualties

Last 12 months, with damage assessment rather than bare classification. Confidence shown on every row; low-confidence rows are recent official records that arrive before damage detail does.

DateVesselTypeAssessedRepair scopeLocation
2026-08-14
IMO 8651855 · —
Other No damage reported Low · 0.32
2026-08-13
IMO 9365685 · Container
Contact Machinery casualty Low · 0.34
2026-08-13
IMO 9224439 · Tanker
Grounding No damage reported Low · 0.24
2026-08-12
IMO 9136228 · Container
Non-accidental Machinery casualty High · 0.77
rudder and steering gear
2026-08-12
IMO 9185293 · Container
Fire / explosion Machinery casualty Med · 0.56
electrical
2026-08-12
IMO 1031329 · —
Non-accidental No damage reported Low · 0.32
2026-08-12
IMO 7327861 · Passenger Ferry Roro
Fire / explosion Minor damage Low · 0.31
2026-08-12
IMO 9037575 · Passenger Ferry Roro
Fire / explosion Minor damage Low · 0.24

Casualty map

Incident positions from structured records. The concentration in US and NW-European waters is the honest shape of current coverage — see Coverage & methodology.

Collision / contact Grounding Fire / explosion Machinery Other

Which yards win casualty work

Demonstrated repair destinations, from tracked shipyard visits following a confirmed casualty (visits explained by a scheduled survey are excluded). The most defensible content on this page — observed, not claimed. Volume is early and grows with coverage.

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING
UNITED STATES
3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 26.3 d avg
ISRAEL SHIPYARDS LTD
ISRAEL
3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 8.5 d avg
DETYENS SHIPYARDS INC (DSI)
UNITED STATES
3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 6.5 d avg
ODESSOS SHIPREPAIR YARD SA
BULGARIA
2 casualty jobs 2 drydock 18.1 d avg
INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & MARINE SERVICES
UNITED STATES
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 20.2 d avg
EDR Antwerp Shipyard
BELGIUM
2 casualty jobs 1 drydock 19.4 d avg
BAE SYSTEMS SHIPYARD JACKSONVILLE
UNITED STATES
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 168.2 d avg
DALES MARINE SERVICES Aberdeen LTD
UNITED KINGDOM
2 casualty jobs 1 drydock 21.9 d avg
IRONHEAD MARINE INC (TOLEDO SHIPYARD)
UNITED STATES
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 356.9 d avg
FAYARD A/S
DENMARK
1 casualty jobs 1 drydock 12.2 d avg
CRIST SA
POLAND
1 casualty jobs 0 drydock 26.1 d avg
Shanhaiguan Shipbuilding Industry - CSSC
CHINA
1 casualty jobs 0 drydock 19.0 d avg

Risk analytics

For charterers, insurers and P&I. Observed casualty frequency by flag, class society and vessel age band — normalised per exposure, with confidence intervals and minimum-sample thresholds so a small fleet never reads as “high risk” on one incident. Observed frequency only; never fault, negligence or liability.

Per-exposure risk rates are enterprise-gated — a raw count is not a rate, and we don't publish one without a defensible denominator.

Request enterprise access

Coverage & methodology

Stated in full, always. Undisclosed gaps are how enterprise deals are lost.

Sources

SourceIncidentsSpan
uscg_iir6,1581991-07-11 – 2026-07-29
maib1,1011912-04-14 – 2025-10-17
gisis1581988-06-15 – 2022-04-16
news702026-07-13 – 2026-08-14

Reporting lag: US Coast Guard ~5-week snapshot; UK MAIB months (investigation-driven); IMO GISIS months (flag-state submissions).

Geographic coverage

97.5% of positioned incidents are in US waters today — a real skew from our current sources (US Coast Guard + UK MAIB). Global coverage is widening through IMO GISIS ingest; until then, treat non-US coverage as partial.

Assessment completeness

20.5% of casualties carry a full damage assessment (specific damage location and scope); the rest are classified but lack the detail for a confident repair scope, and are marked as such. We never present a classification-only record as a full assessment.

What these figures are

Every severity, scope and dock-day figure is an analytical estimate produced by a deterministic model over reported incident data — not a survey. Nothing here asserts cause, fault, negligence or liability. Corrections and right-of-reply: contact us.