Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker
TrustedDocks · Market Data

Damage & Repair Demand

Marine casualties as actionable repair demand: what is damaged, where the vessel is, and the likely repair scope — assessed, not just reported. Covers collisions, groundings, fires, machinery and structural casualties across our sources.

15
Currently seeking repair
casualty within 60 days · still down
82
New casualties · 30 days
6 major · 9 machinery
10,848
Casualties assessed
20.8% with a full damage assessment

Vessels currently seeking repair

Ordered by repair urgency. State is as of each vessel's last AIS observation, not real time. Analytical estimates over reported incident data — not surveys, asserting nothing about cause, fault or liability.

VesselCasualtyAssessed damageStatusUrgency
IMO 7729033 · General Cargo · NORWAY
2026-09-08
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.37
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: lost propulsion.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 8324646 · General Cargo · Togo
2026-09-21
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.36
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9483619 · Tanker · Panama
2026-10-24
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.34
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9306835 · General Cargo · Antigua and Barbuda
2026-10-15
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.34
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9477426 · Bulk Carrier · Republic of Liberia
2026-09-11
position pending
Major structural Low · 0.32
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as major structural because: took on water + collision.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9201750 · Passenger · Bahamas
2026-10-26
position pending
Minor damage Low · 0.24
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as minor damage because: contact.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9625827 · Bulk Carrier · PANAMA
2026-09-17
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.16
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy
IMO 9579561 · Tanker · Portugal (MAR
2026-09-07
position pending
Machinery casualty Low · 0.16
scope not stated
Why this assessment
Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.
Immobilised
still down
Immediate · unseaworthy

7 more vessels currently seeking repair, with candidate-yard matching and alerts.

Sign in to see all 15

Candidate yards (dimensional fit + demonstrated repair experience) ship with the yard-matching release. Coverage is US-skewed today and widening to global — stated in full under Coverage & methodology.

Recent casualties

Last 12 months, with damage assessment rather than bare classification. Confidence shown on every row; low-confidence rows are recent official records that arrive before damage detail does.

DateVesselTypeAssessedRepair scopeLocation
2026-11-04
IMO 9243150 · Tanker
Non-accidental No damage reported Low · 0.32
—
2026-11-03
IMO 9159127 · Service Vessel
Fire / explosion Minor damage Low · 0.34
—
2026-11-03
IMO 9793923 · Container
Fire / explosion Minor damage Low · 0.30
—
2026-11-02
IMO 9290323 · Tanker
Fire / explosion Major structural High · 0.77
hull plating and welding
2026-11-02
IMO 9290323 · Tanker
Non-accidental Major structural Med · 0.60
hull plating and welding
2026-11-02
IMO 9397298 · Gas Carrier
Non-accidental No damage reported Low · 0.32
—
2026-11-02
IMO 9928023 · Tanker
Non-accidental No damage reported Low · 0.24
—
2026-11-02
IMO 9348625 · Container
Non-accidental No damage reported Low · 0.18
—

Casualty map

Incident positions from structured records. The concentration in US and NW-European waters is the honest shape of current coverage — see Coverage & methodology.

Collision / contact Grounding Fire / explosion Machinery Other

Which yards win casualty work

Demonstrated repair destinations, from tracked shipyard visits following a confirmed casualty (visits explained by a scheduled survey are excluded). The most defensible content on this page — observed, not claimed. Volume is early and grows with coverage.

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING
UNITED STATES
5 casualty jobs 0 drydock 18.1 d avg
EDR Antwerp Shipyard
BELGIUM
4 casualty jobs 2 drydock 18.4 d avg
ISRAEL SHIPYARDS LTD
ISRAEL
3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 8.5 d avg
DETYENS SHIPYARDS INC (DSI)
UNITED STATES
3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 6.5 d avg
YIU LIAN SHIPYARD CO LTD (HONGKONG)
CHINA
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 5.3 d avg
INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & MARINE SERVICES
UNITED STATES
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 20.2 d avg
ODESSOS SHIPREPAIR YARD SA
BULGARIA
2 casualty jobs 2 drydock 18.1 d avg
TORGEM SHIPYARD
TURKEY
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 26.6 d avg
TERSAN SHIPYARD
TURKEY
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 17.2 d avg
BAE SYSTEMS SHIPYARD JACKSONVILLE
UNITED STATES
2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 168.2 d avg
DALES MARINE SERVICES Aberdeen LTD
UNITED KINGDOM
2 casualty jobs 1 drydock 21.9 d avg
FAYARD A/S
DENMARK
1 casualty jobs 1 drydock 12.2 d avg

Risk analytics

For charterers, insurers and P&I. Observed casualty frequency by flag, class society and vessel age band — normalised per exposure, with confidence intervals and minimum-sample thresholds so a small fleet never reads as “high risk” on one incident. Observed frequency only; never fault, negligence or liability.

Per-exposure risk rates are enterprise-gated — a raw count is not a rate, and we don't publish one without a defensible denominator.

Request enterprise access

Coverage & methodology

Stated in full, always. Undisclosed gaps are how enterprise deals are lost.

Sources

SourceIncidentsSpan
uscg_iir7,1391991-07-11 – 2026-10-06
maib1,1061912-04-14 – 2026-01-07
news2492026-07-13 – 2026-11-04
gisis2711988-06-15 – 2022-04-16

Reporting lag: US Coast Guard ~5-week snapshot; UK MAIB months (investigation-driven); IMO GISIS months (flag-state submissions).

Geographic coverage

97.6% of positioned incidents are in US waters today — a real skew from our current sources (US Coast Guard + UK MAIB). Global coverage is widening through IMO GISIS ingest; until then, treat non-US coverage as partial.

Assessment completeness

20.8% of casualties carry a full damage assessment (specific damage location and scope); the rest are classified but lack the detail for a confident repair scope, and are marked as such. We never present a classification-only record as a full assessment.

What these figures are

Every severity, scope and dock-day figure is an analytical estimate produced by a deterministic model over reported incident data — not a survey. Nothing here asserts cause, fault, negligence or liability. Corrections and right-of-reply: contact us.