TrustedDocks · Market Data

Damage & Repair Demand

Marine casualties as actionable repair demand: what is damaged, where the vessel is, and the likely repair scope — assessed, not just reported. Covers collisions, groundings, fires, machinery and structural casualties across our sources.

Currently seeking repair

casualty within 60 days · still down

New casualties · 30 days

5 major · 7 machinery

10,454

Casualties assessed

20.8% with a full damage assessment

Vessels currently seeking repair

Ordered by repair urgency. State is as of each vessel's last AIS observation, not real time. Analytical estimates over reported incident data — not surveys, asserting nothing about cause, fault or liability.

Vessel	Casualty	Assessed damage	Status	Urgency
SEA SPIKE IMO 9629952 · Tanker · Marshall Islands	2026-08-17 position pending	Major structural High · 0.81 hull plating and welding Why this assessment Assessed as major structural because: afloat immobilised + took on water + hull plating damage reported. est. 21–180 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
MERCHANT MARINER IMO 9522647 · Bulk Carrier · Greece	2026-09-21 position pending	Minor damage High · 0.77 tank and piping Why this assessment Assessed as minor damage because: tanks damage reported. est. 1–30 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
TRINE IMO 7729033 · General Cargo · NORWAY	2026-09-08 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.37 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: lost propulsion.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
ANI STAR IMO 8324646 · General Cargo · Togo	2026-09-21 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.36 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
NS SPIRIT IMO 9088263 · General Cargo · Belize	2026-09-25 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.34 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
SMF IXORA IMO 9414101 · Tanker · MALAYSIA	2026-09-03 position pending	Minor damage Low · 0.34 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as minor damage because: contact.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
KMAX EMPEROR IMO 9477426 · Bulk Carrier · Republic of Liberia	2026-09-11 position pending	Major structural Low · 0.32 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as major structural because: took on water + collision.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
NEGMAR MEKO IMO 9625451 · Bulk Carrier · Marshall Islands	2026-08-21 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.16 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy

8 more vessels currently seeking repair, with candidate-yard matching and alerts.

Candidate yards (dimensional fit + demonstrated repair experience) ship with the yard-matching release. Coverage is US-skewed today and widening to global — stated in full under Coverage & methodology.

Recent casualties

Last 12 months, with damage assessment rather than bare classification. Confidence shown on every row; low-confidence rows are recent official records that arrive before damage detail does.

Show 4 minor / no-damage-reported records (hidden by default)

Date	Vessel	Type	Assessed	Repair scope
2026-10-13	REM ANDES IMO 9606699 · Offshore	Fire / explosion	Minor damage Low · 0.34	—
2026-10-13	FORTIS IMO 8935407 · General Cargo	Other	No damage reported Low · 0.24	—
2026-10-13	AL MAQAM IMO 9732577 · Tanker	Non-accidental	No damage reported Low · 0.20	—
2026-10-13	DF PEAK IMO 9341067 · Tanker	Other	No damage reported Low · 0.16	—
2026-10-12	CAN-D IMO 8675667 · Tanker	Loss of control	Machinery casualty Low · 0.32	—
2026-10-12	IVYAN IMO 9879088 · Tanker	Loss of control	Machinery casualty Low · 0.30	—
2026-10-12	HMM PLATINUM IMO 9637155 · Container	Fire / explosion	Minor damage Low · 0.28	—
2026-10-12	KURTARMA 7 IMO 9598608 · Service Vessel	Other	No damage reported Low · 0.12	—

Casualty map

Incident positions from structured records. The concentration in US and NW-European waters is the honest shape of current coverage — see Coverage & methodology.

Collision / contact Grounding Fire / explosion Machinery Other

Which yards win casualty work

Demonstrated repair destinations, from tracked shipyard visits following a confirmed casualty (visits explained by a scheduled survey are excluded). The most defensible content on this page — observed, not claimed. Volume is early and grows with coverage.

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING

UNITED STATES

4 casualty jobs 0 drydock 22.3 d avg

ISRAEL SHIPYARDS LTD

ISRAEL

3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 8.5 d avg

DETYENS SHIPYARDS INC (DSI)

UNITED STATES

3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 6.5 d avg

EDR Antwerp Shipyard

BELGIUM

3 casualty jobs 2 drydock 22.4 d avg

INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & MARINE SERVICES

UNITED STATES

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 20.2 d avg

BAE SYSTEMS SHIPYARD JACKSONVILLE

UNITED STATES

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 168.2 d avg

ODESSOS SHIPREPAIR YARD SA

BULGARIA

2 casualty jobs 2 drydock 18.1 d avg

YIU LIAN SHIPYARD CO LTD (HONGKONG)

CHINA

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 5.3 d avg

DALES MARINE SERVICES Aberdeen LTD

UNITED KINGDOM

2 casualty jobs 1 drydock 21.9 d avg

ORSKOV YARD AS

DENMARK

1 casualty jobs 0 drydock 1.0 d avg

Norden Shipyard - ex De Schroef

NETHERLANDS

1 casualty jobs 0 drydock

FAYARD A/S

DENMARK

1 casualty jobs 1 drydock 12.2 d avg

Risk analytics

For charterers, insurers and P&I. Observed casualty frequency by flag, class society and vessel age band — normalised per exposure, with confidence intervals and minimum-sample thresholds so a small fleet never reads as “high risk” on one incident. Observed frequency only; never fault, negligence or liability.

Per-exposure risk rates are enterprise-gated — a raw count is not a rate, and we don't publish one without a defensible denominator.

Request enterprise access

Coverage & methodology

Stated in full, always. Undisclosed gaps are how enterprise deals are lost.

Sources

Source	Incidents	Span
uscg_iir	6,876	1991-07-11 – 2026-09-08
maib	1,105	1912-04-14 – 2026-01-07
news	205	2026-07-13 – 2026-10-13
gisis	189	1988-06-15 – 2022-04-16

Reporting lag: US Coast Guard ~5-week snapshot; UK MAIB months (investigation-driven); IMO GISIS months (flag-state submissions).

Geographic coverage

97.7% of positioned incidents are in US waters today — a real skew from our current sources (US Coast Guard + UK MAIB). Global coverage is widening through IMO GISIS ingest; until then, treat non-US coverage as partial.

Assessment completeness

20.8% of casualties carry a full damage assessment (specific damage location and scope); the rest are classified but lack the detail for a confident repair scope, and are marked as such. We never present a classification-only record as a full assessment.

What these figures are

Every severity, scope and dock-day figure is an analytical estimate produced by a deterministic model over reported incident data — not a survey. Nothing here asserts cause, fault, negligence or liability. Corrections and right-of-reply: contact us.