TrustedDocks · Market Data

Damage & Repair Demand

Marine casualties as actionable repair demand: what is damaged, where the vessel is, and the likely repair scope — assessed, not just reported. Covers collisions, groundings, fires, machinery and structural casualties across our sources.

Currently seeking repair

casualty within 60 days · still down

New casualties · 30 days

3 major · 13 machinery

9,668

Casualties assessed

20.7% with a full damage assessment

Vessels currently seeking repair

Ordered by repair urgency. State is as of each vessel's last AIS observation, not real time. Analytical estimates over reported incident data — not surveys, asserting nothing about cause, fault or liability.

Vessel	Casualty	Assessed damage	Status	Urgency
SEA SPIKE IMO 9629952 · Tanker · Republic of the Marshall Islands	2026-08-17 position pending	Major structural High · 0.81 hull plating and welding Why this assessment Assessed as major structural because: afloat immobilised + took on water + hull plating damage reported. est. 21–180 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
FRONT ALTAIR IMO 9745902 · — · Marshall Islands	2026-08-26 position pending	Machinery casualty High · 0.77 rudder and steering gear Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: steering failure. est. 2–45 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
SMF IXORA IMO 9414101 · Tanker · MALAYSIA	2026-09-03 position pending	Minor damage Low · 0.34 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as minor damage because: contact.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
OCEAN MARY IMO 9297096 · — · Barbados	2026-08-07 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.34 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
HACI HUSEYIN IMO 9128790 · Bulk Carriers · Sao Tome and Principe	2026-08-01 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.32 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
KAPITAN SHYRIAGIN IMO 9137234 · — · Tanzania	2026-08-18 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.30 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: machinery failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
SILVER SKY IMO 9448140 · — · Panama	2026-07-23 position pending	Machinery casualty Low · 0.16 scope not stated Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: steering failure.	Immobilised still down	Immediate · unseaworthy
DOLE COLOMBIA IMO 9185293 · Container · The Commonwealth of the Bahamas	2026-08-12 position pending	Machinery casualty Med · 0.56 electrical Why this assessment Assessed as machinery casualty because: aux engine damage reported. est. 2–45 days · analytical model over extracted incident data.	Immobilised still down	Next port

6 more vessels currently seeking repair, with candidate-yard matching and alerts.

Candidate yards (dimensional fit + demonstrated repair experience) ship with the yard-matching release. Coverage is US-skewed today and widening to global — stated in full under Coverage & methodology.

Recent casualties

Last 12 months, with damage assessment rather than bare classification. Confidence shown on every row; low-confidence rows are recent official records that arrive before damage detail does.

Show 2 minor / no-damage-reported records (hidden by default)

Date	Vessel	Type	Assessed	Repair scope
2026-09-03	TNS CATCHER IMO 9412153 · Tugs	Flooding	total_loss Low · 0.38	—
2026-09-03	IRINI K IMO 8747628 · Others	Flooding	total_loss Low · 0.38	—
2026-09-03	SMF IXORA IMO 9414101 · Tanker	Contact	Minor damage Low · 0.34	—
2026-09-03	SIDR IMO 9854715 · —	Non-accidental	No damage reported Low · 0.28	—
2026-09-02	SENEGAL PROSPERITY IMO 9532757 · Tanker	Non-accidental	Major structural High · 0.81	hull plating and weldingtank and piping
2026-09-02	TELUK BAHANG IMO 9977610 · Passenger Ferry Roro	Collision	No damage reported Low · 0.34	—
2026-09-02	TUGBERK IMAMOGLU IMO 9003548 · —	Collision	total_loss Low · 0.34	—
2026-09-02	CMA CGM PETRA IMO 9977701 · Container	Fire / explosion	Minor damage Low · 0.34	—

Casualty map

Incident positions from structured records. The concentration in US and NW-European waters is the honest shape of current coverage — see Coverage & methodology.

Collision / contact Grounding Fire / explosion Machinery Other

Which yards win casualty work

Demonstrated repair destinations, from tracked shipyard visits following a confirmed casualty (visits explained by a scheduled survey are excluded). The most defensible content on this page — observed, not claimed. Volume is early and grows with coverage.

ISRAEL SHIPYARDS LTD

ISRAEL

3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 8.5 d avg

INGALLS SHIPBUILDING

UNITED STATES

3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 26.3 d avg

DETYENS SHIPYARDS INC (DSI)

UNITED STATES

3 casualty jobs 0 drydock 6.5 d avg

EDR Antwerp Shipyard

BELGIUM

3 casualty jobs 2 drydock 22.4 d avg

ODESSOS SHIPREPAIR YARD SA

BULGARIA

2 casualty jobs 2 drydock 18.1 d avg

INTERNATIONAL SHIP REPAIR & MARINE SERVICES

UNITED STATES

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 20.2 d avg

DALES MARINE SERVICES Aberdeen LTD

UNITED KINGDOM

2 casualty jobs 1 drydock 21.9 d avg

BAE SYSTEMS SHIPYARD JACKSONVILLE

UNITED STATES

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 168.2 d avg

IRONHEAD MARINE INC (TOLEDO SHIPYARD)

UNITED STATES

2 casualty jobs 0 drydock 356.9 d avg

ORSKOV YARD AS

DENMARK

1 casualty jobs 0 drydock 1.0 d avg

DAMEN SHIPREPAIR ROTTERDAM, Location Schiedam

NETHERLANDS

1 casualty jobs 0 drydock 6.8 d avg

FAYARD A/S

DENMARK

1 casualty jobs 1 drydock 12.2 d avg

Risk analytics

For charterers, insurers and P&I. Observed casualty frequency by flag, class society and vessel age band — normalised per exposure, with confidence intervals and minimum-sample thresholds so a small fleet never reads as “high risk” on one incident. Observed frequency only; never fault, negligence or liability.

Per-exposure risk rates are enterprise-gated — a raw count is not a rate, and we don't publish one without a defensible denominator.

Request enterprise access

Coverage & methodology

Stated in full, always. Undisclosed gaps are how enterprise deals are lost.

Sources

Source	Incidents	Span
uscg_iir	6,429	1991-07-11 – 2026-07-29
maib	1,103	1912-04-14 – 2026-01-07
gisis	163	1988-06-15 – 2022-04-16
news	116	2026-07-13 – 2026-09-03

Reporting lag: US Coast Guard ~5-week snapshot; UK MAIB months (investigation-driven); IMO GISIS months (flag-state submissions).

Geographic coverage

97.7% of positioned incidents are in US waters today — a real skew from our current sources (US Coast Guard + UK MAIB). Global coverage is widening through IMO GISIS ingest; until then, treat non-US coverage as partial.

Assessment completeness

20.7% of casualties carry a full damage assessment (specific damage location and scope); the rest are classified but lack the detail for a confident repair scope, and are marked as such. We never present a classification-only record as a full assessment.

What these figures are

Every severity, scope and dock-day figure is an analytical estimate produced by a deterministic model over reported incident data — not a survey. Nothing here asserts cause, fault, negligence or liability. Corrections and right-of-reply: contact us.