Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#70 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-50% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 558 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,510 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,442 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,405 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,096
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,096 of 1,096 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
53 UNITED GRACE
IMO 9870147
182,922 2019
2.3
A
52 MAX WARRIOR
IMO 9600425
205,361 2014
2.3
A
51 CAPE SUN
IMO 9953573
182,436 2023
2.3
A
54 KYRA THALEIA
IMO 9375915
81,383 2009
2.3
A
56 SHANDONG DREAM
IMO 9907952
207,996 2021
2.3
A
55 UNITED ETERNITY
IMO 9802102
182,859 2017
2.3
A
57 CSK GENERATION
IMO 9736949
182,618 2016
2.3
A
58 DODO
IMO 9336024
176,760 2006
2.3
A
59 RTM DRAKE
IMO 9591351
205,437 2013
2.3
A
61 CAPE CAMELLIA
IMO 9531856
206,400 2013
2.3
A
60 CAPE PEREGRINE
IMO 9500754
180,643 2012
2.3
A
62 MINERAL KEVIN
IMO 9683271
180,958 2014
2.3
A
63 BERGE MCCLINTOCK
IMO 9590852
181,458 2011
2.3
A
64 CAPE DISCOVERY
IMO 9851294
208,603 2019
2.3
A
65 BERGE TOWNSEND
IMO 9567063
175,588 2012
2.3
A
66 GOOD HORIZON
IMO 9767089
182,342 2017
2.4
A
69 TRUE CHARIOT
IMO 9726774
182,571 2015
2.4
A
68 LEMESSOS QUEEN
IMO 9959149
82,751 2023
2.4
A
67 STAR ASIA
IMO 9715490
181,056 2017
2.4
A
71 BERGE ISHIZUCHI
IMO 9446570
181,458 2011
2.4
A
70 CAPE AQUA
IMO 9538402
178,055 2009
2.4
A
72 BO MAY
IMO 9980186
182,317 2025
2.4
A
73 OU MAY
IMO 9751016
180,003 2017
2.4
A
74 LUCY OLDENDORFF
IMO 9691553
181,380 2008
2.4
A
77 CAPRICORN ONE
IMO 9739018
181,319 2015
2.4
A
76 HAUKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9871115
208,000 2022
2.4
A
75 PACIFIC SARAH
IMO 9835886
180,999 2019
2.4
A
78 SECRETARIAT
IMO 9699701
181,036 2015
2.4
A
79 CAPE IRIS
IMO 9563689
181,403 2012
2.4
A
80 APOLLONIUS
IMO 9718234
180,544 2016
2.4
A
83 TOPEKA
IMO 9721671
179,548 2015
2.4
A
82 GH KAHLO
IMO 9617521
179,816 2014
2.4
A
81 NAVIOS CORALI
IMO 9747948
181,088 2015
2.4
A
84 BERGE HOVERLA
IMO 9497359
175,918 2010
2.4
A
85 BERGE TRIGLAV
IMO 9572666
175,885 2010
2.5
A
88 BERGE ROSA
IMO 9346378
180,230 2006
2.5
A
87 PACIFIC MYRA
IMO 9835898
181,060 2019
2.5
A
86 MOUNT TROODOS
IMO 9402287
181,383 2007
2.5
A
92 INDIAN FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9521394
181,125 2013
2.5
A
91 JSW SALEM
IMO 9537721
176,217 2012
2.5
A
90 SKYTHIA
IMO 9423920
177,830 2010
2.5
A
89 KM OSAKA
IMO 9604990
180,652 2012
2.5
A
97 CS HANG ZHOU
IMO 9874703
180,000 2015
2.5
A
98 CAPE OWL
IMO 9729219
179,510 2016
2.5
A
96 NAVIOS MARS
IMO 9747950
181,259 2016
2.5
A
93 STAR DRAGON
IMO 9508392
178,062 2008
2.5
A
95 CS NAN JING
IMO 9874698
179,668 2021
2.5
A
94 SQUIRESHIP
IMO 9391646
170,000 2010
2.5
A
99 CS JI NAN
IMO 9874686
179,606 2021
2.5
A
100 CAPE PEONY
IMO 9425447
181,325 2012
2.5
A
Page 2 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.