Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,682 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+120% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 286 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
59
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
44
'27 Q4
69
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2
36
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,283 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,064 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

394
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,537M
capex range, top measure per vessel (394 of 394 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1651 SOUTHERN OWL
IMO 9773143
26,057 2016
9.8
E
1652 ASPHALT SPIRIT
IMO 9612557
14,484 2012
9.9
E
1653 ANWAAR AL NASER
IMO 9313450
29,006 2006
9.9
E
1654 NV APOLLO
IMO 9587790
21,306 2010
10.0
E
1655 TONDA
IMO 9274654
36,803 2005
10.0
E
1656 STEEL
IMO 9380594
37,538 2008
10.1
E
1657 BENTLEY I
IMO 9253129
40,081 2004
10.1
E
1658 BOW AGATHE
IMO 9393010
33,608 2009
10.1
E
1659 BORIS SOKOLOV
IMO 9817315
51,416 2018
10.2
E
1660 VALCADORE
IMO 9384112
37,481 2008
10.2
E
1661 NOSTOS
IMO 9258014
47,147 2003
10.2
E
1662 OTTOMANA
IMO 9299214
27,300 2006
10.2
E
1663 GEA
IMO 9292591
39,999 2005
10.2
E
1664 STI BRIXTON
IMO 9686869
38,734 2014
10.2
E
1665 ATLANTIC ASPHALT
IMO 9798428
17,764 2017
10.3
E
1666 SEARAY
IMO 9255490
32,310 2004
10.4
E
1667 SEASHARK
IMO 9298193
32,302 2004
10.4
E
1668 STI ACTON
IMO 9696553
38,734 2014
10.5
E
1669 BRO NISSUM
IMO 9340623
16,674 2008
10.5
E
1670 KRITI EPISKOPI
IMO 9340104
38,396 2006
10.6
E
1671 HENRIETTE MAERSK
IMO 9399349
37,985 2006
10.6
E
1672 KINGSTON
IMO 9420863
38,341 2009
10.7
E
1673 KUBA
IMO 9383089
8,525 2007
10.7
E
1674 SOUTHERN PUMA
IMO 9792008
26,071 2016
10.7
E
1675 LISBON
IMO 9223916
19,783 2000
10.8
E
1676 CASTILLO DE ARTEAGA
IMO 9871012
37,430 2019
10.8
E
1677 T. AYLIN
IMO 9679880
19,928 2015
10.9
E
1678 SEAMARLIN
IMO 9380489
40,549 2007
10.9
E
1679 ANWAAR AL KHALIJ
IMO 9313424
29,006 2005
11.0
E
1680 MINERVA ANNA
IMO 9298507
39,990 2005
11.0
E
1681 MERENGUE
IMO 9309980
38,431 2007
11.0
E
1682 LIFE STAR
IMO 9435325
13,030 2007
11.2
E
1683 DA MING SHAN
IMO 9779745
12,980 2016
11.3
E
1684 WONDER MIMOSA
IMO 9312901
37,620 2006
11.3
E
1685 HAVVA ANA
IMO 9997385
8,817 2024
11.3
E
1686 WHITE ALLEGRA
IMO 9973353
17,779 2023
11.4
E
1687 BAGSHOT
IMO 9938987
17,933 2023
11.4
E
1688 ASENA
IMO 9274628
37,188 2004
11.5
E
1689 SEASPRAT
IMO 9380477
40,598 2007
11.5
E
1690 NV MINERVA
IMO 9542166
19,992 2011
11.7
E
1691 ATRIA
IMO 9492842
13,005 2010
11.7
E
1692 SEACONGER
IMO 9352298
32,200 2005
11.7
E
1693 MAERSK KATE
IMO 9431276
39,755 2006
11.8
E
1694 OASIS II
IMO 9167150
34,985 2000
11.9
E
1695 MESTRAL
IMO 9391402
37,554 2008
11.9
E
1696 STEN FRIGG
IMO 9407976
16,587 2009
12.1
E
1697 T RIGEL
IMO 9585039
20,919 2007
12.3
E
1698 STEN BOTHNIA
IMO 9378735
16,611 2008
12.4
E
1699 DA HUA SHAN
IMO 9779757
12,972 2017
12.5
E
1700 SARACENA
IMO 9334325
20,500 2007
12.6
E
Page 34 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.