Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,277 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
19.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+92% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 ELLEN ESSBERGER
IMO 9272747
8,571 2004
18.0
E
1252 TINERFE
IMO 9498107
17,540 2009
18.0
E
1253 BASAT
IMO 9447029
10,745 2008
18.1
E
1254 ORIENTAL ACACIA
IMO 9553048
12,332 2011
18.1
E
1255 LIESEL ESSBERGER
IMO 9272761
8,571 2004
18.2
E
1256 GENNARO IEVOLI
IMO 9268631
12,004 2004
18.3
E
1257 SHANNON STAR
IMO 9503926
13,023 2010
18.3
E
1258 CHARLOTTE THERESA
IMO 9400708
11,403 2008
18.3
E
1259 GTM DENMARK
IMO 9528902
11,596 2011
18.4
E
1260 LASCAUX
IMO 9405746
11,674 2007
18.4
E
1261 IVER AMBITION
IMO 9439163
9,228 2009
18.4
E
1262 AC-D
IMO 9428437
7,842 2008
18.4
E
1263 BASARAN BAYRAK
IMO 9932165
8,127 2022
18.4
E
1264 MANAS
IMO 9447055
10,744 2008
18.5
E
1265 CAROLINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9439151
8,792 2009
18.5
E
1266 GIULIA IEVOLI
IMO 9284439
13,776 2004
18.5
E
1267 SLOMAN HERAKLES
IMO 9466726
16,417 2012
18.6
E
1268 SHAMROCK JUPITER
IMO 9416082
19,837 2009
18.6
E
1269 PLEVNE
IMO 9340908
11,321 2007
18.7
E
1270 DOMENICO IEVOLI
IMO 9334430
10,015 2006
18.7
E
1271 W WEST
IMO 9383651
8,026 2008
18.7
E
1272 TINA THERESA
IMO 9478298
7,902 2009
18.8
E
1273 AMALIE ESSBERGER
IMO 9314777
8,571 2005
18.8
E
1274 BLUE BIRD
IMO 9527764
9,938 2011
18.8
E
1275 NQ ZINNIA
IMO 9150327
10,128 1998
18.9
E
1276 ALICE THERESA
IMO 9478303
7,874 2010
18.9
E
1277 NISI
IMO 9328974
15,601 2005
19.0
E
1278 MED ADRIATIC
IMO 9410662
8,270 2013
19.1
E
1279 NQ CALIPSO
IMO 9138408
10,020 1997
19.1
E
1280 LADY ELA
IMO 9511442
7,668 2009
19.2
E
1281 KARINA THERESA
IMO 9428451
7,871 2009
19.2
E
1282 SCOT BERLIN
IMO 9255804
8,254 2003
19.2
E
1283 TRANS EMERALD
IMO 9295452
8,650 2005
19.2
E
1284 WILHELMINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9295440
8,631 2005
19.3
E
1285 LISA ESSBERGER
IMO 9295438
8,617 2005
19.3
E
1286 GALIASGAR KAMAL
IMO 9820776
7,053 2018
19.4
E
1287 OLYMPUS
IMO 9310355
9,189 2006
19.4
E
1288 CATHY THERESA
IMO 9478315
7,826 2011
19.4
E
1289 DUZGIT DIGNITY
IMO 9581019
8,488 2014
19.5
E
1290 SCANDIC
IMO 9386249
11,505 2007
19.5
E
1291 AGNES ESSBERGER
IMO 9327047
11,340 2006
19.6
E
1292 NORDIC
IMO 9438444
11,530 2008
19.6
E
1293 NEW RANGER
IMO 9328326
12,951 2007
19.7
E
1294 SPRING
IMO 9416812
13,022 2006
19.7
E
1295 ARABELLA
IMO 9909247
7,703 2021
19.8
E
1296 SONGA JADE
IMO 9473925
17,604 2009
19.9
E
1297 GOLFSTRAUM
IMO 9390991
9,595 2011
19.9
E
1298 NORDSTRAUM
IMO 9523548
9,616 2012
19.9
E
1299 NORMA
IMO 9870666
7,399 2020
20.0
E
1300 ENDO OSTRO
IMO 9393656
7,335 2008
20.0
E
Page 26 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.