Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,276 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
19.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+92% higher
E

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 ELLEN ESSBERGER
IMO 9272747
8,571 2004
18.0
E
1252 TINERFE
IMO 9498107
17,540 2009
18.0
E
1253 BASAT
IMO 9447029
10,745 2008
18.1
E
1254 ORIENTAL ACACIA
IMO 9553048
12,332 2011
18.1
E
1255 LIESEL ESSBERGER
IMO 9272761
8,571 2004
18.2
E
1256 GENNARO IEVOLI
IMO 9268631
12,004 2004
18.3
E
1257 SHANNON STAR
IMO 9503926
13,023 2010
18.3
E
1258 CHARLOTTE THERESA
IMO 9400708
11,403 2008
18.3
E
1259 GTM DENMARK
IMO 9528902
11,596 2011
18.4
E
1260 LASCAUX
IMO 9405746
11,674 2007
18.4
E
1261 IVER AMBITION
IMO 9439163
9,228 2009
18.4
E
1262 AC-D
IMO 9428437
7,842 2008
18.4
E
1263 BASARAN BAYRAK
IMO 9932165
8,127 2022
18.4
E
1264 MANAS
IMO 9447055
10,745 2008
18.5
E
1265 GIULIA IEVOLI
IMO 9284439
13,776 2004
18.5
E
1266 SLOMAN HERAKLES
IMO 9466726
16,417 2012
18.6
E
1267 SHAMROCK JUPITER
IMO 9416082
19,837 2009
18.6
E
1268 PLEVNE
IMO 9340908
11,321 2007
18.7
E
1269 DOMENICO IEVOLI
IMO 9334430
10,015 2006
18.7
E
1270 W WEST
IMO 9383651
8,025 2008
18.7
E
1271 TINA THERESA
IMO 9478298
7,902 2009
18.8
E
1272 AMALIE ESSBERGER
IMO 9314777
8,571 2005
18.8
E
1273 BLUE BIRD
IMO 9527764
9,938 2011
18.8
E
1274 NQ ZINNIA
IMO 9150327
10,128 1998
18.9
E
1275 ALICE THERESA
IMO 9478303
7,874 2010
18.9
E
1276 NISI
IMO 9328974
15,601 2005
19.0
E
1277 MED ADRIATIC
IMO 9410662
8,269 2013
19.1
E
1278 NQ CALIPSO
IMO 9138408
10,020 1997
19.1
E
1279 CAROLINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9439151
8,506 2009
19.1
E
1280 LADY ELA
IMO 9511442
7,667 2009
19.2
E
1281 KARINA THERESA
IMO 9428451
7,871 2009
19.2
E
1282 SCOT BERLIN
IMO 9255804
8,254 2003
19.2
E
1283 TRANS EMERALD
IMO 9295452
8,650 2005
19.2
E
1284 WILHELMINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9295440
8,631 2005
19.3
E
1285 LISA ESSBERGER
IMO 9295438
8,617 2005
19.3
E
1286 CATHY THERESA
IMO 9478315
7,846 2011
19.3
E
1287 GALIASGAR KAMAL
IMO 9820776
7,053 2018
19.4
E
1288 OLYMPUS
IMO 9310355
9,189 2006
19.4
E
1289 DUZGIT DIGNITY
IMO 9581019
8,488 2014
19.5
E
1290 SCANDIC
IMO 9386249
11,505 2007
19.5
E
1291 AGNES ESSBERGER
IMO 9327047
11,340 2006
19.6
E
1292 NORDIC
IMO 9438444
11,530 2008
19.6
E
1293 NEW RANGER
IMO 9328326
12,951 2007
19.7
E
1294 SPRING
IMO 9416812
13,021 2009
19.7
E
1295 ARABELLA
IMO 9909247
7,703 2021
19.8
E
1296 SONGA JADE
IMO 9473925
17,604 2009
19.9
E
1297 GOLFSTRAUM
IMO 9390991
9,595 2011
19.9
E
1298 NORDSTRAUM
IMO 9523548
9,616 2012
19.9
E
1299 NORMA
IMO 9870666
7,399 2020
20.0
E
1300 ENDO OSTRO
IMO 9393656
7,335 2008
20.0
E
Page 26 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.