Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,251 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
15.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+63% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 SONGA JADE
IMO 9473925
17,604 2009
15.3
E
1252 SARAJEVO
IMO 9477490
11,320 2008
15.3
E
1253 APATYTH
IMO 9970739
8,116 2024
15.3
E
1254 ANNELIESE ESSBERGER
IMO 9295426
8,648 2005
15.3
E
1255 HARBOUR FEATURE
IMO 9473092
16,909 2011
15.4
E
1256 NORMAN
IMO 9125279
10,022 1996
15.4
E
1257 SLOMAN HERAKLES
IMO 9466726
16,417 2012
15.4
E
1258 TASING SWAN
IMO 9403891
11,336 2007
15.4
E
1259 ILHAN BAYRAK
IMO 9956434
8,116 2023
15.4
E
1260 BESIKTAS ZEALAND
IMO 9431044
18,289 2009
15.5
E
1261 KAPIDAG
IMO 9034731
8,674 1992
15.5
E
1262 SYDSTRAUM
IMO 9854478
10,191 2020
15.5
E
1263 K ONSET
IMO 9359595
12,902 2006
15.6
E
1264 LILY PG
IMO 9823390
7,330 2018
15.6
E
1265 BRENTHOLMEN
IMO 9436393
16,850 2007
15.7
E
1266 CHRISTINA
IMO 9118496
9,494 1996
15.8
E
1267 FERICEK
IMO 9125267
10,106 1996
15.9
E
1268 SEA DUCK
IMO 9443839
12,966 2007
15.9
E
1269 NEW RANGER
IMO 9328326
12,951 2007
16.0
E
1270 ALANGOVA
IMO 9411927
12,089 2008
16.0
E
1271 TORC
IMO 9544683
13,214 2010
16.1
E
1272 TRANS EXETER
IMO 9314753
9,437 2004
16.2
E
1273 ARSLAND
IMO 9395989
16,791 2008
16.2
E
1274 LASCAUX
IMO 9405746
11,674 2007
16.2
E
1275 NAVE ATRIA
IMO 9459060
49,992 2012
16.3
E
1276 GIULIA IEVOLI
IMO 9284439
13,776 2004
16.3
E
1277 MAZU XIAO
IMO 9503940
7,739 2008
16.3
E
1278 KIVALLIQ W.
IMO 9187409
13,671 2004
16.3
E
1279 GOLFSTRAUM
IMO 9390991
9,595 2011
16.4
E
1280 BERGSTRAUM
IMO 9108740
9,494 1996
16.5
E
1281 STAV POWER
IMO 9267560
14,665 2005
16.5
E
1282 ORIENTAL ACACIA
IMO 9553048
12,332 2011
16.5
E
1283 MENTOR
IMO 9340374
13,013 2007
16.5
E
1284 SONGA TAURUS
IMO 9373644
16,611 2009
16.5
E
1285 ANCHOR 18
IMO 9406714
19,971 2009
16.5
E
1286 EVA BERGEN
IMO 9800013
19,888 2018
16.5
E
1287 TEQUILA
IMO 9345219
13,016 2004
16.6
E
1288 SILENDI
IMO 9508720
19,964 2009
16.6
E
1289 BALTIC
IMO 9451226
11,253 2020
16.6
E
1290 ORIS GRACE
IMO 9658422
7,054 2012
16.6
E
1291 SONGA CRYSTAL
IMO 9378321
12,927 2006
16.6
E
1292 GOLDEN ORCHID
IMO 9486178
17,055 2009
16.6
E
1293 IVER ABILITY
IMO 9327504
12,497 2006
16.6
E
1294 ASKARA
IMO 9431886
10,744 2008
16.7
E
1295 SUNLIT
IMO 9340386
13,065 2007
16.7
E
1296 TINA THERESA
IMO 9478298
7,902 2009
16.7
E
1297 RYSTRAUM
IMO 9391000
9,597 2012
16.7
E
1298 AMALIE ESSBERGER
IMO 9314777
8,571 2005
16.8
E
1299 NQ TULIPA
IMO 9312406
8,908 2004
16.8
E
1300 ELISALEX SCHULTE
IMO 9439876
16,427 2006
16.8
E
Page 26 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.