Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#934 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+14% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 JAL GARUDA
IMO 9196709
26,617 2000
10.9
D
902 HOUYOSHI PARK
IMO 9725847
19,998 2016
10.9
D
903 SH FREESIA
IMO 9505986
19,991 2011
10.9
D
904 OCEAN AGLAIA
IMO 9182796
18,736 2002
10.9
D
905 FAIRCHEM FYNBOS
IMO 9914292
19,982 2021
11.0
D
906 GOBY
IMO 9363833
19,994 2008
11.0
D
907 MED ATLANTIC
IMO 9410533
26,234 2011
11.0
D
908 FAIRCHEM RESTIO
IMO 9920291
19,971 2022
11.0
D
909 STOLT CONFIDENCE
IMO 9102071
37,090 1996
11.0
D
910 MELATI 5
IMO 9172258
31,963 1999
11.0
D
911 TG LEO
IMO 9640097
19,801 2012
11.0
D
912 ORIENTAL VIOLA
IMO 9824928
16,293 2020
11.1
D
913 CHEM HOUSTON
IMO 9705720
19,997 2014
11.1
D
914 SONGA FALCON
IMO 9396012
25,418 2009
11.1
D
915 STOLT EFFORT
IMO 9178202
37,155 1999
11.1
D
916 SONGA BREEZE
IMO 9423645
19,999 2009
11.1
D
917 EVA DIAMOND
IMO 9888144
19,880 2022
11.1
D
918 CHEM ALTAMIRA
IMO 9705744
19,998 2015
11.1
D
919 MIAMI
IMO 9304320
19,991 2005
11.1
D
920 NINA AN
IMO 9451733
40,399 2010
11.1
D
921 STOLT INSPIRATION
IMO 9102083
37,205 1997
11.1
D
922 CHEM ARGON
IMO 9716004
19,993 2016
11.1
D
923 STOLT INTEGRITY
IMO 9680097
38,853 2017
11.1
D
924 CHEM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9640140
19,804 2014
11.1
D
925 SILVER RAY
IMO 9493133
19,801 2013
11.2
D
926 BLADE GALAXY
IMO 9692416
19,994 2014
11.2
D
927 EVA USUKI
IMO 9865532
19,808 2020
11.2
D
928 TIVOLI PARK
IMO 9780536
19,994 2018
11.2
D
929 JAL SIDDHI
IMO 9323778
19,805 2006
11.2
D
930 STOLT SURF
IMO 9168623
22,220 2000
11.2
D
931 HOPE A
IMO 9282821
40,095 2002
11.2
D
932 MTM SHANGHAI
IMO 9345908
19,885 2006
11.2
D
933 BIRDIE TRADER
IMO 9724099
19,822 2016
11.2
D
934 MAGENTA RAY
IMO 9829722
19,998 2019
11.3
D
935 CHEMICAL CONTENDER
IMO 9847140
15,945 2018
11.3
D
936 AMELIA
IMO 9624768
21,287 2011
11.3
D
937 BEGONIA
IMO 9287297
20,622 2003
11.3
D
938 FLOYEN
IMO 9749790
19,998 2016
11.3
D
939 SINO STAR
IMO 9263693
46,219 2003
11.3
D
940 MTM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9477567
21,144 2011
11.3
D
941 EASTERLY AS OLIVIA
IMO 9340489
19,981 2007
11.3
D
942 EASTERLY BEECH GALAXY
IMO 9340441
19,998 2007
11.3
D
943 CHEM GALLIUM
IMO 9740782
19,973 2017
11.3
D
944 CELSIUS MIDDELFART
IMO 9733349
19,997 2014
11.3
D
945 ZHENG HE 3
IMO 9264465
19,997 2002
11.3
D
946 STOLT BETULA
IMO 9266267
25,023 2003
11.4
D
947 BARBOUNI
IMO 9416020
19,822 2007
11.4
D
948 TERNSUND
IMO 9722390
14,847 2016
11.4
D
949 SLOMAN HEBE
IMO 9809784
16,432 2019
11.4
D
950 TG TAURUS
IMO 9523835
26,199 2011
11.4
D
Page 19 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.