Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#934 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+14% higher
D

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 ICHESIA M
IMO 9436678
40,429 2009
10.9
D
902 HOUYOSHI PARK
IMO 9725847
19,998 2016
10.9
D
903 SH FREESIA
IMO 9505986
19,991 2011
10.9
D
904 OCEAN AGLAIA
IMO 9182796
18,736 2002
10.9
D
905 GOBY
IMO 9363833
19,994 2008
11.0
D
906 MED ATLANTIC
IMO 9410533
26,234 2011
11.0
D
907 FAIRCHEM FYNBOS
IMO 9914292
19,982 2021
11.0
D
908 FAIRCHEM RESTIO
IMO 9920291
19,971 2022
11.0
D
909 MELATI 5
IMO 9172258
31,963 1999
11.0
D
910 STOLT CONFIDENCE
IMO 9102071
37,090 1996
11.0
D
911 TG LEO
IMO 9640097
19,800 2012
11.0
D
912 SONGA FALCON
IMO 9396012
25,418 2009
11.1
D
913 CHEM HOUSTON
IMO 9705720
19,997 2014
11.1
D
914 STOLT EFFORT
IMO 9178202
37,155 1999
11.1
D
915 ORIENTAL VIOLA
IMO 9824928
16,293 2020
11.1
D
916 EVA DIAMOND
IMO 9888144
19,880 2022
11.1
D
917 SONGA BREEZE
IMO 9423645
19,999 2009
11.1
D
918 CHEM ALTAMIRA
IMO 9705744
19,998 2015
11.1
D
919 MIAMI
IMO 9304320
19,991 2005
11.1
D
920 NINA AN
IMO 9451733
40,399 2010
11.1
D
921 STOLT INSPIRATION
IMO 9102083
37,205 1997
11.1
D
922 CHEM ARGON
IMO 9716004
19,993 2016
11.1
D
923 STOLT INTEGRITY
IMO 9680097
38,853 2017
11.1
D
924 CHEM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9640140
19,804 2014
11.1
D
925 BLADE GALAXY
IMO 9692416
19,994 2014
11.2
D
926 SILVER RAY
IMO 9493133
19,801 2013
11.2
D
927 EVA USUKI
IMO 9865532
19,808 2020
11.2
D
928 TIVOLI PARK
IMO 9780536
19,994 2018
11.2
D
929 JAL SIDDHI
IMO 9323778
19,805 2006
11.2
D
930 STOLT SURF
IMO 9168623
22,220 2000
11.2
D
931 BIRDIE TRADER
IMO 9724099
19,822 2016
11.2
D
932 HOPE A
IMO 9282821
40,095 2004
11.2
D
933 MTM SHANGHAI
IMO 9345908
19,885 2006
11.2
D
934 MAGENTA RAY
IMO 9829722
19,998 2019
11.3
D
935 CHEMICAL CONTENDER
IMO 9847140
15,945 2018
11.3
D
936 BEGONIA
IMO 9287297
20,622 2003
11.3
D
937 FLOYEN
IMO 9749790
19,997 2016
11.3
D
938 MTM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9477567
21,144 2011
11.3
D
939 SINO STAR
IMO 9263693
46,219 2003
11.3
D
940 EASTERLY AS OLIVIA
IMO 9340489
19,981 2007
11.3
D
941 AMELIA
IMO 9624768
21,203 2011
11.3
D
942 EASTERLY BEECH GALAXY
IMO 9340441
19,998 2007
11.3
D
943 CHEM GALLIUM
IMO 9740782
19,973 2017
11.3
D
944 ZHENG HE 3
IMO 9264465
19,997 2002
11.3
D
945 CELSIUS MIDDELFART
IMO 9733349
19,997 2015
11.3
D
946 STOLT BETULA
IMO 9266267
25,023 2003
11.4
D
947 TERNSUND
IMO 9722390
14,847 2016
11.4
D
948 BARBOUNI
IMO 9416020
19,822 2007
11.4
D
949 SLOMAN HEBE
IMO 9809784
16,432 2019
11.4
D
950 SONGA WINDS
IMO 9416109
19,954 2009
11.4
D
Page 19 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.