Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#133 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-46% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
102 ELANDRA MAPLE
IMO 9831191
49,999 2018
4.9
A
101 CAPE TALLIN
IMO 9441154
73,662 2008
4.9
A
103 TORM MALAYSIA
IMO 9443164
49,999 2011
4.9
A
104 STENA CONTINENT
IMO 1022706
49,948 2025
4.9
A
108 MARI INNOVATOR
IMO 9909572
49,999 2021
4.9
A
107 ELANDRA MELODY
IMO 9676527
50,885 2014
4.9
A
106 ELDIA
IMO 9798351
49,996 2019
4.9
A
105 JANE
IMO 9364588
51,506 2008
4.9
A
109 LILA MIAMI
IMO 9332303
49,999 2007
5.0
A
110 STI MAVERICK
IMO 9833589
49,999 2017
5.0
A
113 BULLDOG
IMO 9858072
49,856 2020
5.0
A
112 HAFNIA MIKALA
IMO 9732709
49,999 2017
5.0
A
111 NORD HARMONY
IMO 9870719
50,494 2020
5.0
A
114 POINT LISAS
IMO 9905162
49,996 2021
5.0
A
117 LORA
IMO 9917804
55,202 2022
5.0
A
116 ST. MICHAELIS
IMO 9788473
50,159 2018
5.0
A
115 PACIFIC DEBBIE
IMO 9772058
73,500 2017
5.0
A
118 TRISTAR JISHA
IMO 9655975
49,999 2011
5.0
A
119 ATLANTIC INFINITY
IMO 9797759
50,090 2015
5.0
A
120 SEAPROMISE
IMO 9934125
50,394 2021
5.0
A
122 MATRAH
IMO 9405849
51,021 2008
5.0
A
121 PACIFIC CITRINE
IMO 9906893
50,299 2021
5.0
A
123 ZOILO
IMO 9704441
49,990 2015
5.0
A
125 NAVIG8 GLADIATOR
IMO 9853230
49,762 2019
5.0
A
124 ZANDOLIE
IMO 9893163
50,494 2021
5.0
A
127 TORM TITAN
IMO 9712319
49,667 2016
5.0
A
126 OLYMPIOS
IMO 9919620
50,434 2021
5.0
A
130 TORM STRONG
IMO 9836062
49,954 2019
5.0
A
129 SILVER ELLIE
IMO 9692387
49,635 2015
5.0
A
128 CLEAROCEAN MARIGOLD
IMO 9655987
49,999 2014
5.0
A
131 YASA HAWK
IMO 9619531
49,990 2017
5.0
A
132 PRECIOUS ADELAIDE
IMO 9982548
49,999 2024
5.0
A
133 ATLANTIC SUNFLOWER
IMO 9993872
49,999 2025
5.0
A
134 PIS PRECIOUS
IMO 9689158
50,259 2013
5.1
A
136 PICO BASILE
IMO 9776250
51,525 2016
5.1
A
138 HYGGE
IMO 9939589
49,999 2021
5.1
A
135 FPMC 32
IMO 9831701
49,660 2019
5.1
A
137 GORDONS BAY
IMO 9997220
49,999 2025
5.1
A
139 KATHERINE LADY
IMO 9916123
49,999 2022
5.1
A
141 YAQUT
IMO 9917878
55,202 2022
5.1
A
140 SILVER GINNY
IMO 9682318
49,746 2014
5.1
A
142 CHALLENGE PINNACLE
IMO 9788588
49,996 2015
5.1
A
143 JAL KALP
IMO 1014008
50,664 2025
5.1
A
144 ARDMORE GIBRALTAR
IMO 9790373
49,999 2017
5.1
A
147 NORD VENTURA
IMO 9910337
49,999 2021
5.1
A
146 MH DAISEN
IMO 9997218
49,948 2025
5.1
A
145 NORD MAJESTIC
IMO 9902835
49,998 2021
5.1
A
148 SOLAR LAI FONG
IMO 9907809
49,358 2021
5.1
A
149 AMWAJ
IMO 9917892
55,202 2023
5.1
A
150 MINERVA ZEN
IMO 9410909
52,914 2009
5.2
A
Page 3 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.