Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,873 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-1% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 K.RUBY
IMO 9514042
55,688 2011
4.6
C
1852 GLOBAL PRIME
IMO 9658941
56,013 2014
4.6
C
1853 BULK ANTIGUA
IMO 9839818
61,602 2015
4.6
C
1854 STAR WAVE
IMO 9746009
61,491 2017
4.6
C
1855 HERCULES
IMO 9642382
75,200 2013
4.6
C
1856 SSI VICTORY
IMO 9595943
56,781 2012
4.6
C
1857 XIN HAI TONG 37
IMO 9594597
56,539 2012
4.6
C
1858 NORD HOUSTON
IMO 9989297
40,552 2024
4.6
C
1859 RODINA
IMO 9968487
45,167 2024
4.6
C
1860 AVRA
IMO 9859791
61,225 2015
4.6
C
1861 AFRICAN CRATE
IMO 9657870
39,049 2014
4.6
C
1862 WOOYANG HERMES
IMO 9421257
54,296 2008
4.6
C
1863 AIKATERINI
IMO 9700055
63,512 2014
4.6
C
1864 GANNET BULKER
IMO 9441300
57,809 2010
4.6
C
1865 SSI CONQUEST
IMO 9637416
57,200 2013
4.6
C
1866 ERSOZ KAYE
IMO 9625798
57,157 2010
4.6
C
1867 RILA
IMO 9754915
44,940 2017
4.6
C
1868 SEACON BANGKOK
IMO 9991305
40,540 2024
4.6
C
1869 GULLUK
IMO 9228100
50,992 2002
4.6
C
1870 SEA EAGLE
IMO 9224673
48,377 2001
4.6
C
1871 EVER RELIANCE
IMO 9423578
57,991 2011
4.6
C
1872 FEDERAL WILLIAM PAUL
IMO 9975454
34,763 2025
4.6
C
1873 ANNA-ELISABETH
IMO 9407471
55,709 2008
4.6
C
1874 SPAR GEMINI
IMO 9307580
53,113 2007
4.6
C
1875 ITAMOS
IMO 9929352
63,567 2022
4.6
C
1876 GIVING
IMO 9159402
45,428 1997
4.6
C
1877 DEJIMA CONFIDENCE
IMO 9989936
40,426 2025
4.6
C
1878 XIN HAI TONG 29
IMO 9445681
57,295 2011
4.6
C
1879 MILIN KAMAK
IMO 9841641
45,493 2020
4.6
C
1880 CLOVER
IMO 9668386
61,377 2013
4.6
C
1881 CAPT EUGENE
IMO 9478767
55,499 2010
4.7
C
1882 EVA BRISTOL
IMO 9856323
63,681 2021
4.7
C
1883 EMMA JANNEKE
IMO 9992256
39,974 2024
4.7
C
1884 ROSTRUM DUBAI
IMO 9983243
40,004 2025
4.7
C
1885 SPAR VEGA
IMO 9490870
57,970 2011
4.7
C
1886 SHI ZI FENG
IMO 9617466
56,605 2011
4.7
C
1887 EAGLE
IMO 9490674
58,018 2010
4.7
C
1888 PRISMA
IMO 9461805
57,255 2010
4.7
C
1889 OYSTER BAY
IMO 9718636
55,100 2016
4.7
C
1890 SEA CREDENCE
IMO 9479010
55,640 2010
4.7
C
1891 YASAR KEMAL
IMO 9230191
52,827 2001
4.7
C
1892 CORNELIE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9498846
93,246 2011
4.7
C
1893 INCE BEYLERBEYI
IMO 9599767
61,429 2012
4.7
C
1894 FALCON ICHIBAN
IMO 1031991
39,513 2025
4.7
C
1895 EVA ISTANBUL
IMO 9972440
40,552 2023
4.7
C
1896 AFRICAN WARBLER
IMO 9852717
38,209 2020
4.7
C
1897 GERDT OLDENDORFF
IMO 9681950
80,874 2014
4.7
C
1898 ERRIKOS
IMO 9624500
56,591 2014
4.7
C
1899 JEWEL OF SOHAR
IMO 9514107
55,875 2011
4.7
C
1900 STAR SOUTHPORT
IMO 9575228
63,301 2013
4.7
C
Page 38 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.