Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#982 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-14% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 CALIDA
IMO 9522128
115,812 2008
4.3
C
952 MINERVA SOPHIA
IMO 9382762
115,748 2009
4.3
C
953 SEABLISS
IMO 9587207
158,982 2012
4.3
C
954 SEALEO
IMO 9473066
107,505 2012
4.3
C
955 SEA JAGUAR
IMO 9482627
114,024 2007
4.4
C
956 STI JERMYN
IMO 9722596
109,999 2015
4.4
C
957 PACIFIC A. DORODCHI
IMO 9732266
109,999 2016
4.4
C
958 BLUE INTEGRITY
IMO 9388778
108,926 2005
4.4
C
959 BAHRA
IMO 9595008
110,761 2012
4.4
C
960 SILVER MILLIE
IMO 9692363
49,642 2015
4.4
C
961 MINERVA NOUNOU
IMO 9309423
114,850 2006
4.4
C
962 HELLAS CALAFIA
IMO 9798088
49,810 2018
4.4
C
963 NORTH SEA
IMO 9760495
106,340 2016
4.4
C
964 CLEAROCEAN MUSTANG
IMO 9893761
49,999 2019
4.4
C
965 DUBAI CHARM
IMO 9402495
115,514 2006
4.4
C
966 STI ALEXIS
IMO 9696694
109,999 2015
4.4
C
967 GULF CORAL
IMO 9389851
74,999 2009
4.4
C
968 YASA GOLDEN BOSPHORUS
IMO 9334038
115,867 2007
4.4
C
969 TORM THOR
IMO 9712292
49,666 2015
4.4
C
970 MARI JONE
IMO 9725316
49,999 2016
4.4
C
971 ATHENS VOYAGER
IMO 9337391
105,614 2007
4.4
C
972 SEASTAR
IMO 9373656
116,049 2005
4.4
C
973 CHIOS I
IMO 9792187
156,984 2017
4.4
C
974 SEA JEWEL
IMO 9607722
112,081 2010
4.4
C
975 GEM NO. 3
IMO 9774343
79,920 2014
4.4
C
976 SEA STAR
IMO 9607710
112,147 2010
4.4
C
977 ALYARMOUK
IMO 9356438
116,038 2008
4.4
C
978 LILLESAND
IMO 9336397
105,786 2007
4.5
C
979 SYNNØVE KNUTSEN
IMO 9868388
152,868 2020
4.5
C
980 EAGLE PETROLINA
IMO 9858553
153,226 2020
4.5
C
981 PINTAIL PACIFIC
IMO 9983891
49,773 2022
4.5
C
982 NAVIG8 MACALLISTER
IMO 9482873
75,618 2012
4.5
C
983 MINERVA PISCES
IMO 9410179
105,475 2006
4.5
C
984 SUNNY LIGER
IMO 9332626
74,997 2008
4.5
C
985 SEAPRINCESS
IMO 9373668
115,948 2005
4.5
C
986 MINERVA ELPIDA
IMO 9440526
112,793 2010
4.5
C
987 ALEXANDER
IMO 9826720
113,170 2017
4.5
C
988 EAGLE PARAISO
IMO 9858577
153,264 2020
4.5
C
989 DUGI OTOK
IMO 9334727
108,414 2008
4.5
C
990 KMARIN RESTRAINT
IMO 9683075
109,526 2017
4.5
C
991 HAFNIA EGRET
IMO 9607174
49,999 2014
4.5
D
992 ATROTOS
IMO 9953432
50,113 2023
4.5
D
993 NAVIG8 MARTINEZ
IMO 9482847
75,599 2011
4.5
D
994 SEA HYMN
IMO 9412036
116,337 2011
4.5
D
995 ALBERTA
IMO 9486922
104,760 2010
4.5
D
996 ALDER EXPRESS
IMO 9934163
49,832 2020
4.5
D
997 BOUVARDIA
IMO 9935595
111,009 2021
4.5
D
998 PRIMERO
IMO 9741815
106,329 2016
4.5
D
999 VALLESINA
IMO 9417311
109,089 2009
4.5
D
1000 SEMERU
IMO 9388376
105,777 2008
4.5
D
Page 20 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.