Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#646 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-39% greener
B
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
600 APL LE HAVRE
IMO 9461881
10,106 TEU 2012
5.8
B
602 MAERSK COPENHAGEN
IMO 9525405
4,500 TEU 2012
5.8
B
603 TAYMA EXPRESS
IMO 9525895
13,296 TEU 2012
5.8
B
604 CAPE SOUNIO
IMO 9727625
11,000 TEU 2017
5.8
B
605 CMA CGM URAL
IMO 9705079
10,622 TEU 2015
5.8
B
606 MSC CLORINDA
IMO 9484429
14,000 TEU 2012
5.8
B
608 CSCL URANUS
IMO 9467304
13,300 TEU 2012
5.8
B
607 MSC MUMBAI VIII
IMO 9294991
8,400 TEU 2005
5.8
B
610 MSC NAIROBI X
IMO 9605243
9,400 TEU 2013
5.9
B
609 MH PERSEUS
IMO 9967433
7,000 TEU 2021
5.9
B
611 CMA CGM GANGES
IMO 9718117
10,000 TEU 2013
5.9
B
612 COSCO NETHERLANDS
IMO 9516430
13,386 TEU 2008
5.9
B
613 MAERSK SAN LAZARO
IMO 9717216
10,600 TEU 2015
5.9
B
614 MSC MOMBASA
IMO 9967275
8,002 TEU 2024
5.9
B
616 ELEONORA MAERSK
IMO 9321500
11,000 TEU 2004
5.9
B
615 EMMA MAERSK
IMO 9321483
11,000 TEU 2004
5.9
B
618 COPIAPO
IMO 9687526
9,326 TEU 2014
5.9
B
617 CMA CGM ZEPHYR
IMO 9882487
15,000 TEU 2021
5.9
B
619 MAERSK GIBRALTAR
IMO 9739692
10,100 TEU 2016
5.9
B
621 APL COLUMBUS
IMO 9597525
9,200 TEU 2014
5.9
B
620 EVER TOP
IMO 9665619
13,800 TEU 2014
5.9
B
622 MSC EMMA
IMO 9463047
10,000 TEU 2011
5.9
B
623 CMA CGM FORT BOURBON
IMO 9966752
7,600 TEU 2024
5.9
B
624 ONE RESILIENCE
IMO 9952751
7,000 TEU 2024
5.9
B
625 LEONIDIO
IMO 9618587
4,800 TEU 2014
5.9
B
626 MSC FLAVIA
IMO 9467433
12,400 TEU 2012
5.9
B
627 CAPE AKRITAS
IMO 9706190
11,000 TEU 2016
6.0
B
628 CAPE KORTIA
IMO 9727613
11,000 TEU 2017
6.0
B
629 MSC JOSSELINE
IMO 9842061
15,000 TEU 2019
6.0
B
631 MSC BETTINA
IMO 9399038
10,000 TEU 2010
6.0
B
630 MSC ALINA
IMO 9695016
9,000 TEU 2014
6.0
B
632 MAERSK GUAYAQUIL
IMO 9727871
10,100 TEU 2015
6.0
B
636 GSL CHRISTEL ELISABETH
IMO 9280641
5,782 TEU 2004
6.0
B
635 CAPE TAINARO
IMO 9706205
11,000 TEU 2017
6.0
B
634 CMA CGM THALASSA
IMO 9356294
11,000 TEU 2008
6.0
B
633 MAERSK SAN VINCENT
IMO 9717228
10,600 TEU 2015
6.0
B
637 CMA CGM PHOENIX
IMO 9597501
9,200 TEU 2013
6.0
B
638 EUGEN MAERSK
IMO 9321550
11,000 TEU 2004
6.0
B
640 EDITH MAERSK
IMO 9321548
11,000 TEU 2004
6.0
B
639 MSC EUGENIA
IMO 9785469
11,500 TEU 2022
6.0
B
642 CMA CGM CALLISTO
IMO 9410753
11,400 TEU 2010
6.0
B
641 MSC TERESA
IMO 9469560
14,000 TEU 2011
6.0
B
643 EVER FAITH
IMO 9850525
11,000 TEU 2020
6.0
B
644 VUNG TAU EXPRESS
IMO 9767998
10,100 TEU 2018
6.0
B
645 MSC ALANYA
IMO 9785483
12,200 TEU 2021
6.0
B
649 OOCL BREMERHAVEN
IMO 9979254
5,920 TEU 2024
6.1
B
648 ONE ALTAIR
IMO 9468308
9,592 TEU 2010
6.1
B
647 SAN FERNANDO
IMO 9698642
8,714 TEU 2015
6.1
B
646 MSC BERYL
IMO 9467392
12,400 TEU 2010
6.1
B
650 MSC AMERICA
IMO 9963580
15,600 TEU 2025
6.1
B
Page 13 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.