Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,136 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-18% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1103 YILDIZLAR 3
IMO 9370795
49,507 2008
3.8
B
1105 EQUINOX SOFRANO
IMO 9860221
61,056 2015
3.8
B
1102 EPSON TRADER
IMO 9872963
62,661 2021
3.8
B
1107 XIN HAI TONG 23
IMO 9453236
56,708 2010
3.8
B
1106 STAR OCEAN
IMO 1016484
64,576 2025
3.8
B
1101 VAN JAGUAR
IMO 9692662
60,263 2015
3.8
B
1104 KOBAYASHI MARU
IMO 9847011
60,397 2019
3.8
B
1108 KAVO YERAKI
IMO 9286607
82,926 2006
3.8
B
1111 FANTASEA
IMO 9342827
76,596 2006
3.8
B
1120 SPRING JASMINE
IMO 9942079
63,441 2023
3.8
B
1110 SIBONEY M
IMO 9875018
81,621 2020
3.8
B
1121 ALBATROSS ISLAND
IMO 9421439
61,414 2006
3.8
B
1109 FJ BIANCA
IMO 9866172
81,750 2020
3.8
B
1112 LOWLANDS FUTURE
IMO 9799771
60,063 2017
3.8
B
1119 GIORGIS
IMO 9619775
82,566 2014
3.8
B
1118 LACERTA
IMO 9512367
82,265 2012
3.8
B
1117 GREEN K-MAX 4
IMO 9838084
80,891 2020
3.8
B
1116 ANTIPAROS
IMO 9600657
81,572 2012
3.8
B
1115 AQUA LADY
IMO 9288435
76,492 2004
3.8
B
1114 FEDERAL INTEGRITY
IMO 9933066
63,729 2023
3.8
B
1113 EXELIXSEA
IMO 9476953
76,361 2011
3.8
B
1123 CL BEIJING
IMO 9649299
81,700 2013
3.8
B
1122 XH HOPE
IMO 9877925
84,998 2022
3.8
B
1127 YASA SATURN
IMO 9848144
61,075 2019
3.8
B
1129 BSM FANGCHENG
IMO 9863819
63,674 2020
3.8
B
1126 XIN JI XING
IMO 9256872
76,015 2004
3.8
B
1131 NECKLACE
IMO 9548225
92,903 2012
3.8
B
1130 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.8
B
1125 MAHA YAYA
IMO 9525613
84,108 2013
3.8
B
1124 ASKIO
IMO 9848649
63,464 2020
3.8
B
1128 CMB JORDAENS
IMO 9860635
63,447 2019
3.8
B
1134 RED ORCHID
IMO 9757890
61,645 2015
3.9
B
1133 ZERMATT
IMO 9634830
82,026 2013
3.9
B
1135 CASSIOPEIA OCEAN
IMO 9837286
81,700 2015
3.9
B
1132 SAVITA NAREE
IMO 9726437
62,971 2016
3.9
B
1138 SEAHUNTER
IMO 9974424
63,253 2024
3.9
B
1139 RI GUAN FENG
IMO 9523146
75,566 2010
3.9
B
1137 SM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9842499
80,897 2019
3.9
B
1142 FEDERAL ILLINOIS
IMO 9860647
63,386 2019
3.9
B
1141 GLBS MIGHT
IMO 9972804
64,166 2022
3.9
B
1140 BULK COURAGEOUS
IMO 9659919
61,393 2013
3.9
B
1136 GERTRUDE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9727601
80,959 2016
3.9
B
1143 AMIS WISDOM VI
IMO 9589803
61,456 2011
3.9
B
1150 ARETHUSA
IMO 9855563
81,541 2020
3.9
B
1149 SSI VIGILANT
IMO 9918743
63,861 2022
3.9
B
1148 AKIRA
IMO 9859014
81,782 2019
3.9
B
1147 CHLOE
IMO 9749910
81,629 2014
3.9
B
1146 ULTRALAZ
IMO 9781085
64,043 2018
3.9
B
1145 THALEIA
IMO 9542491
74,979 2011
3.9
B
1144 LEONARDO
IMO 9894777
63,676 2020
3.9
B
Page 23 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.