Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,647 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
13.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+32% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 SONGA PUMA
IMO 9399789
2,750 TEU 2009
13.3
D
1602 KAAN KALKAVAN
IMO 9365879
1,849 TEU 2012
13.3
D
1603 CMA CGM AQABA
IMO 9334820
1,740 TEU 2007
13.3
D
1604 CMA CGM MAPUTO
IMO 9491628
1,740 TEU 2011
13.4
D
1605 MED CESME
IMO 9256365
1,740 TEU 2003
13.4
D
1606 MUSTAFA DAYI
IMO 9365855
1,849 TEU 2011
13.4
D
1607 CMA CGM FUZHOU
IMO 9596313
1,740 TEU 2014
13.4
D
1608 VEGA COLIGNY
IMO 9939876
1,868 TEU 2023
13.4
D
1609 MSC BELLE
IMO 9203904
1,098 TEU 1998
13.4
D
1610 MARLA BULL
IMO 9932945
1,900 TEU 2022
13.4
D
1611 MSC ALBA F
IMO 9499010
1,022 TEU 2008
13.4
D
1612 LUEBECK
IMO 9216092
1,040 TEU 2001
13.4
D
1613 BG BLUE
IMO 9964625
1,400 TEU 2024
13.4
D
1614 CAPE FRANKLIN
IMO 9359301
1,440 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1615 ANNABA
IMO 9306201
1,574 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1616 LION
IMO 9208356
1,716 TEU 2000
13.5
D
1617 CAPE FERROL
IMO 9359325
1,440 TEU 2008
13.5
D
1618 CMA CGM SAHARA
IMO 9220861
2,226 TEU 2002
13.6
D
1619 CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
IMO 9809837
3,300 TEU 2019
13.6
D
1620 AVA D
IMO 9306225
1,574 TEU 2007
13.6
D
1621 KESTREL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
13.6
D
1622 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,349 TEU 2011
13.6
D
1623 BFAD PACIFIC
IMO 9364203
2,490 TEU 2005
13.6
D
1624 GARWOOD
IMO 9347255
1,819 TEU 2008
13.7
D
1625 ELBBRIDGE
IMO 9968920
1,400 TEU 2021
13.7
D
1626 JOANNA
IMO 9204477
1,730 TEU 1999
13.7
D
1627 SPRING C
IMO 9308027
3,500 TEU 2007
13.7
D
1628 MSC JIANI
IMO 9966934
1,800 TEU 2023
13.7
E
1629 CMA CGM ABIDJAN
IMO 9323481
1,740 TEU 2006
13.7
E
1630 X-PRESS SAGARMALA
IMO 9862736
1,800 TEU 2021
13.8
E
1631 NEVZAT KALKAVAN
IMO 9365867
1,849 TEU 2011
13.8
E
1632 MSC ADRIANA II
IMO 9169055
1,658 TEU 1998
13.8
E
1633 AS NURIA
IMO 9391787
3,534 TEU 2009
13.8
E
1634 MSC ASSUNTA III
IMO 9243590
2,672 TEU 2004
13.8
E
1635 CTM ISTMO
IMO 9430870
1,740 TEU 2010
13.9
E
1636 MSC TAMISHKA F
IMO 9358905
1,300 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1637 MSC PANAYA
IMO 9217565
1,728 TEU 2000
13.9
E
1638 ATOUT
IMO 9354648
1,698 TEU 2010
13.9
E
1639 AURETTE A
IMO 9242285
1,170 TEU 2002
14.0
E
1640 CMA CGM CAYENNE
IMO 9709192
2,100 TEU 2015
14.0
E
1641 CMA CGM SUEZ
IMO 9312652
1,740 TEU 2006
14.1
E
1642 MERIOS
IMO 9264764
657 TEU 2003
14.2
E
1643 PAN GG
IMO 9236286
1,155 TEU 2002
14.2
E
1644 DIANE A
IMO 9385532
1,604 TEU 2008
14.3
E
1645 MAERSK NAMIBIA
IMO 9289180
2,100 TEU 2003
14.3
E
1646 TANGER A
IMO 9330939
1,440 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1647 CMA CGM MARSEILLE
IMO 9709207
2,100 TEU 2015
14.3
E
1648 MEDKON SAMSUN
IMO 9305934
707 TEU 2004
14.4
E
1649 CMA CGM NACALA
IMO 9550307
1,577 TEU 2009
14.4
E
1650 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.5
E
Page 33 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.