Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,090 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
13.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+0% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 LADY LAURA
IMO 9321108
11,534 2006
13.6
C
1052 NORDIC KYLIE
IMO 9357999
12,791 2005
13.6
C
1053 KENAN ATASOY
IMO 9215658
7,116 2000
13.6
C
1055 FEED RANA
IMO 9291705
4,933 2004
13.7
C
1054 BMI EMPEROR
IMO 9310331
6,139 2005
13.7
C
1056 RAMUS
IMO 9318400
6,063 2005
13.7
C
1057 DOLFIJNGRACHT
IMO 9420825
17,967 2009
13.7
C
1058 HAPPY DRAGON
IMO 9551961
18,103 2011
13.7
C
1059 ONEGO ELBE
IMO 9438573
11,087 2008
13.7
C
1061 SKY DOLPHIN
IMO 1029039
3,802 2025
13.7
C
1060 DIAMANTGRACHT
IMO 9420813
17,966 2009
13.7
C
1062 ANHOLT
IMO 9968205
5,217 2024
13.7
C
1065 BBC RAINBOW
IMO 9423516
18,019 2010
13.7
C
1064 EMS LUNA
IMO 1022275
4,672 2025
13.7
C
1063 NORAN
IMO 9175822
8,595 1997
13.7
C
1066 FINN II
IMO 9534468
10,049 2012
13.7
C
1067 HIIUMAA
IMO 9973286
5,962 2024
13.7
C
1068 NAVIN FALCON
IMO 9492933
7,933 2008
13.8
C
1069 JUMBO
IMO 8518297
3,697 1987
13.8
C
1072 ESL AFRICA
IMO 9397171
17,356 2007
13.8
C
1071 INDUSTRIAL SONG
IMO 9750464
12,292 2017
13.8
C
1070 FWN STAR
IMO 9721645
10,546 2015
13.8
C
1073 LADY RUBINA
IMO 9370109
13,464 2008
13.8
C
1075 DOGGERSBANK
IMO 9341768
6,665 2006
13.8
C
1074 SUNA
IMO 9080986
4,452 1994
13.8
C
1076 KATJA
IMO 9454838
6,684 2009
13.8
C
1078 SLOMAN DISCHARGER
IMO 9463578
12,961 2011
13.8
C
1077 SCHIPPERSGRACHT
IMO 9197363
21,402 2000
13.8
C
1082 SINGELGRACHT
IMO 9197375
21,311 2000
13.8
C
1081 KAREN C
IMO 9523952
6,794 2010
13.8
C
1080 BALTIC DREAM
IMO 9969522
3,718 2025
13.8
C
1079 BIRKHOLM
IMO 9968229
5,213 2024
13.8
C
1083 YANGZE VENUS
IMO 9428401
12,094 2013
13.8
C
1084 SAXONA
IMO 9371024
5,015 2006
13.8
C
1085 RESAT AGA
IMO 9545467
6,616 2009
13.8
C
1086 MY MELODY
IMO 9006382
3,713 1994
13.8
C
1089 C.ATLAS
IMO 9199141
3,683 2003
13.8
C
1088 UNISUN
IMO 9448451
9,825 2009
13.8
C
1087 BBC NAGASAKI
IMO 9559872
9,717 2011
13.8
C
1091 JSP FALSTER
IMO 9968152
5,231 2023
13.8
C
1090 SPAARNEGRACHT
IMO 9202558
21,402 2000
13.8
C
1093 PENHAR
IMO 9534365
6,500 2010
13.9
C
1092 AMBER TRADER
IMO 9180853
6,320 1998
13.9
C
1094 JSP SAMSØ
IMO 9968217
5,198 2024
13.9
C
1095 BILLIE
IMO 9488047
12,696 2011
13.9
C
1096 TALI
IMO 9173692
13,340 1998
13.9
C
1099 ONEGO EMS
IMO 9290074
10,683 2004
13.9
C
1098 TRANSUND
IMO 9213088
16,612 2002
13.9
C
1097 YI HUI REN HAI
IMO 9628685
12,312 2013
13.9
C
1100 ANNE
IMO 9433365
7,594 2010
13.9
C
Page 22 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.