Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#400 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

5.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.39)

-46% greener

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E

A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

112

'28 Q1

'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,485	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,440	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,344	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	965	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	795	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	360	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,295–7,790M

capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)

1.48–2.63 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Jan 2028
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Aug 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k	E	18y	2026	59%	Mar 2028
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k	E	21y	2026	55%	Feb 2027

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.4

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
353	MSC CAMILLE IMO 9404651	13,300 TEU	2009	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.3	A
352	EVER ALP IMO 9893929	23,992 TEU	2021	400 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 11X92-B	5.3	A
351	APL SINGAPURA IMO 9632002	13,892 TEU	2013	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.3	A
354	APL TEMASEK IMO 9631955	13,892 TEU	2013	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.3	A
355	MSC VENICE IMO 9647473	16,552 TEU	2016	399 m	STX - 12K98MC-C	5.3	A
357	MSC JOSSELINE IMO 9842061	15,000 TEU	2019	366 m	Wärtsilä - 10X92	5.3	A
356	MSC VIRGO IMO 9857171	15,000 TEU	2020	366 m	Wärtsilä - 8X92	5.3	A
358	CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER IMO 9702144	17,722 TEU	2015	398 m	Doosan - 11S90ME-C9	5.3	A
359	MSC RAVENNA IMO 9484431	14,000 TEU	2011	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.3	A
360	MSC KATRINA IMO 9467445	12,400 TEU	2012	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.3	A
361	MSC GRETA III IMO 9415296	2,732 TEU	2008	211 m	MAN - 7S70MC-C	5.3	A
364	ANGELICA MAERSK IMO 9948798	16,592 TEU	2021	351 m	8G95ME-C10-LGIM	5.3	A
363	MSC MIRJA IMO 9762338	15,909 TEU	2016	398 m	Doosan - 11G95ME-C9	5.3	A
362	SEASPAN GANGES IMO 9630365	10,100 TEU	2014	336 m	MAN - 10S90ME-C9	5.3	A
365	CMA CGM KERGUELEN IMO 9702132	17,722 TEU	2015	398 m	Doosan - 11S90ME-C9	5.4	A
366	EA CENTAURUS IMO 9967469	7,092 TEU	2023	272 m	CSSC-MES Diesel Co Ltd - China 7G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.4	A
368	EVER GLORY IMO 9786839	20,000 TEU	2019	400 m	MAN - 11G95ME-C9	5.4	A
367	ONE MANCHESTER IMO 9706748	13,870 TEU	2015	366 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.4	A
369	MAERSK HOUSTON IMO 9848950	15,286 TEU	2019	353 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	5.4	A
371	CMA CGM MAUI IMO 9938157	15,000 TEU	2024	366 m	Wärtsilä - 10X92DF	5.4	A
370	MAERSK COPENHAGEN IMO 9525405	4,500 TEU	2012	249 m	HHI - 6S80ME-C9	5.4	A
372	MSC KATIE IMO 9467457	12,400 TEU	2012	366 m	STX - 12K98MC-C	5.4	A
373	MSC INGY IMO 9755945	17,590 TEU	2016	400 m	Doosan - 11G95ME-C9	5.4	A
374	MAERSK HAMBURG IMO 9784312	15,282 TEU	2018	353 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	5.4	A
375	HOUSTON EXPRESS IMO 9667150	13,800 TEU	2014	368 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.4	A
377	CMA CGM ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT IMO 9454448	16,020 TEU	2013	396 m	Doosan - 14RT-flex96C	5.4	A
376	EVER GENTLE IMO 9820922	20,150 TEU	2019	400 m	Mitsui - 11S90ME-C9	5.4	A
380	CMA CGM ADONIS IMO 9882528	15,000 TEU	2022	366 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 10X92-LPSCR	5.5	A
379	MSC ALINA IMO 9695016	9,000 TEU	2014	300 m	HHI - W9X82	5.5	A
378	CMA CGM CEDRUS IMO 9938121	15,000 TEU	2024	366 m	Wärtsilä - 10X92DF	5.5	A
381	THESEUS IMO 9728954	13,455 TEU	2016	369 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.5	A
383	EVER ALOT IMO 9893955	23,888 TEU	2022	400 m	CSSC-MES Diesel Co Ltd - China 11X92	5.5	A
382	APL CHANGI IMO 9631981	13,892 TEU	2013	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.5	A
385	APL VANDA IMO 9631993	17,292 TEU	2013	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.5	A
384	EVER GOVERN IMO 9832717	20,150 TEU	2019	400 m	MAN - 11G95ME-C9	5.5	A
386	EVER GIVEN IMO 9811000	20,000 TEU	2015	400 m	Mitsui - 11G95ME-C9	5.5	A
387	APL MERLION IMO 9632014	13,892 TEU	2014	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.5	A
388	MSC TARANTO IMO 9475258	14,000 TEU	2011	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.5	A
389	APL DETROIT IMO 9632208	9,200 TEU	2014	328 m	Doosan - 10S90ME-C MK9.2 TIER 2	5.5	A
390	CMA CGM KIMBERLEY IMO 9894973	15,000 TEU	2021	366 m	CSSC-MES Diesel Co. Ltd. 10X92DF	5.5	A
391	MSC EVA IMO 9401130	10,000 TEU	2010	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.5	A
392	EXPRESS FRANCE IMO 9443035	3,459 TEU	2010	223 m	Hyundai - 7RT-FLEX82C	5.5	A
393	CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN IMO 9695169	19,000 TEU	2015	400 m	Hyundai - 12S90ME-C9	5.5	A
395	ONE RESOLUTION IMO 9952763	7,000 TEU	2024	272 m	7G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.6	A
394	CMA CGM RIVOLI IMO 9839193	22,448 TEU	2021	400 m	CSSC - 12X92DF	5.6	A
397	MSC BIANCA IMO 9770749	11,500 TEU	2019	328 m	Doosan - 9S90ME-C10	5.6	A
396	MSC ROSA M IMO 9461398	14,000 TEU	2010	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.6	A
399	MSC MAPUTO IMO 9967263	8,002 TEU	2024	272 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 6G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.6	A
398	EVER MEED IMO 9935258	15,000 TEU	2024	366 m	WinGD 9X92	5.6	A
400	MSC LAURENCE IMO 9467419	12,400 TEU	2011	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.6	A

Page 8 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.