Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
CII band distribution
1,079 at D/E2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months
Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter
Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.
Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment
| Measure | Eligible | CO₂ reduction | Capex band | Payback | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger cut-out | 1,640 | 1–3% | €80k–250k | — | vendor claim |
| Propeller redesign / replacement | 1,427 | 5–10% | €400k–1,200k | — | vendor claim |
| Bulbous bow reprofiling | 1,330 | 2–6% | €300k–900k | — | vendor claim |
| Methanol dual-fuel conversion | 933 | 5–15% | €8,000k–20,000k | — | vendor claim |
| LNG dual-fuel conversion | 763 | 15–25% | €15,000k–35,000k | — | vendor claim |
| Shaft generator / PTO | 348 | 3–6% | €500–1,500/kW | — | vendor claim |
Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.
Retrofit opportunity in this segment
Retrofit prospects — worst band first
| Vessel | Band | Age | Drop year |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k | E | 16y | 2026 |
| MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k | E | 1y | 2026 |
| SEPELU · <25k | E | 26y | 2026 |
| C LION · 100-200k | E | 21y | 2026 |
| HAMBURG TRADER · <25k | E | 21y | 2026 |
Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.
| # | Vessel | Size (TEU) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 353 |
EVER ALP
IMO 9893929
|
23,992 TEU | 2021 |
5.3
|
A |
| 352 |
APL SINGAPURA
IMO 9632002
|
17,292 TEU | 2013 |
5.3
|
A |
| 351 |
MSC CAMILLE
IMO 9404651
|
14,036 TEU | 2009 |
5.3
|
A |
| 354 |
ALETTE MAERSK
IMO 9948774
|
16,592 TEU | 2021 |
5.3
|
A |
| 355 |
APL TEMASEK
IMO 9631955
|
17,292 TEU | 2013 |
5.3
|
A |
| 357 |
MSC JOSSELINE
IMO 9842061
|
15,000 TEU | 2019 |
5.3
|
A |
| 356 |
MSC VIRGO
IMO 9857171
|
15,000 TEU | 2020 |
5.3
|
A |
| 358 |
CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
IMO 9702144
|
17,554 TEU | 2015 |
5.3
|
A |
| 359 |
MSC RAVENNA
IMO 9484431
|
14,036 TEU | 2011 |
5.3
|
A |
| 360 |
MSC KATRINA
IMO 9467445
|
12,400 TEU | 2012 |
5.3
|
A |
| 362 |
MSC GRETA III
IMO 9415296
|
2,732 TEU | 2008 |
5.3
|
A |
| 361 |
SEASPAN GANGES
IMO 9630365
|
10,100 TEU | 2014 |
5.3
|
A |
| 363 |
EA CENTAURUS
IMO 9967469
|
7,092 TEU | 2021 |
5.4
|
A |
| 365 |
EVER GLORY
IMO 9786839
|
20,150 TEU | 2019 |
5.4
|
A |
| 364 |
ONE MANCHESTER
IMO 9706748
|
13,870 TEU | 2015 |
5.4
|
A |
| 367 |
CMA CGM MAUI
IMO 9938157
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
5.4
|
A |
| 366 |
MAERSK COPENHAGEN
IMO 9525405
|
4,500 TEU | 2008 |
5.4
|
A |
| 368 |
MAERSK HOUSTON
IMO 9848950
|
15,286 TEU | 2019 |
5.4
|
A |
| 369 |
MSC KATIE
IMO 9467457
|
12,400 TEU | 2012 |
5.4
|
A |
| 370 |
HOUSTON EXPRESS
IMO 9667150
|
13,806 TEU | 2014 |
5.4
|
A |
| 371 |
MAERSK HAMBURG
IMO 9784312
|
15,226 TEU | 2015 |
5.4
|
A |
| 373 |
CMA CGM ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT
IMO 9454448
|
16,000 TEU | 2013 |
5.4
|
A |
| 372 |
EVER GENTLE
IMO 9820922
|
20,000 TEU | 2015 |
5.4
|
A |
| 375 |
MSC ALINA
IMO 9695016
|
9,000 TEU | 2013 |
5.5
|
A |
| 374 |
CMA CGM CEDRUS
IMO 9938121
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
5.5
|
A |
| 376 |
CMA CGM ADONIS
IMO 9882528
|
15,000 TEU | 2022 |
5.5
|
A |
| 379 |
THESEUS
IMO 9728954
|
14,354 TEU | 2016 |
5.5
|
A |
| 378 |
APL CHANGI
IMO 9631981
|
17,292 TEU | 2013 |
5.5
|
A |
| 377 |
EVER ALOT
IMO 9893955
|
23,888 TEU | 2022 |
5.5
|
A |
| 381 |
EVER GOVERN
IMO 9832717
|
20,000 TEU | 2015 |
5.5
|
A |
| 380 |
APL VANDA
IMO 9631993
|
17,292 TEU | 2013 |
5.5
|
A |
| 382 |
EVER GIVEN
IMO 9811000
|
20,000 TEU | 2015 |
5.5
|
A |
| 384 |
MSC TARANTO
IMO 9475258
|
14,036 TEU | 2011 |
5.5
|
A |
| 383 |
APL MERLION
IMO 9632014
|
17,292 TEU | 2014 |
5.5
|
A |
| 385 |
APL DETROIT
IMO 9632208
|
9,200 TEU | 2011 |
5.5
|
A |
| 386 |
CMA CGM KIMBERLEY
IMO 9894973
|
15,000 TEU | 2021 |
5.5
|
A |
| 387 |
MSC REEF
IMO 9754965
|
19,224 TEU | 2016 |
5.5
|
A |
| 389 |
MSC EVA
IMO 9401130
|
13,798 TEU | 2010 |
5.5
|
A |
| 388 |
EXPRESS FRANCE
IMO 9443035
|
3,398 TEU | 2010 |
5.5
|
A |
| 390 |
CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN
IMO 9695169
|
18,982 TEU | 2015 |
5.5
|
A |
| 392 |
CMA CGM RIVOLI
IMO 9839193
|
23,000 TEU | 2021 |
5.6
|
A |
| 391 |
ONE RESOLUTION
IMO 9952763
|
7,000 TEU | 2024 |
5.6
|
A |
| 394 |
MSC BIANCA
IMO 9770749
|
12,091 TEU | 2019 |
5.6
|
A |
| 393 |
MSC ROSA M
IMO 9461398
|
14,036 TEU | 2010 |
5.6
|
A |
| 395 |
MSC MAPUTO
IMO 9967263
|
8,030 TEU | 2024 |
5.6
|
A |
| 396 |
EVER MEED
IMO 9935258
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
5.6
|
A |
| 398 |
MSC LAURENCE
IMO 9467419
|
12,400 TEU | 2011 |
5.6
|
A |
| 397 |
CMA CGM KERGUELEN
IMO 9702132
|
17,554 TEU | 2015 |
5.6
|
A |
| 400 |
MSC SONIA
IMO 9404663
|
14,036 TEU | 2010 |
5.6
|
A |
| 399 |
MSC AURORA
IMO 9484481
|
13,050 TEU | 2012 |
5.6
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.