Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,437 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-12% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1401 KIRA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9867566
81,290 2020
4.1
C
1400 HSL KENSINGTON
IMO 9950648
64,452 2023
4.1
C
1399 KONSTANTINOS D
IMO 9972608
63,516 2024
4.1
C
1398 TIGER LILY
IMO 9744984
81,886 2016
4.1
C
1397 MARINA
IMO 9309497
87,036 2006
4.1
C
1406 GLAFKOS
IMO 9696448
63,519 2016
4.1
C
1409 KAVO PERDIKA
IMO 9584889
58,740 2013
4.1
C
1411 ZOITSA SIGALA
IMO 9700861
63,350 2014
4.1
C
1408 TRAMP LADY
IMO 9286621
76,294 2005
4.1
C
1416 PLANA
IMO 9835769
47,096 2019
4.1
C
1413 AGIOS MAKARIOS
IMO 9474709
80,929 2017
4.1
C
1412 ALEXANDROS P.
IMO 9723045
63,127 2017
4.1
C
1407 THRASYVOULOS V
IMO 9767493
61,214 2016
4.1
C
1415 STAR ELIZABETH
IMO 9917488
82,403 2021
4.1
C
1414 YANGZE 8
IMO 9725732
63,515 2014
4.1
C
1410 EQUINOX EAGLE
IMO 9711298
61,208 2015
4.1
C
1420 SEAHABIT
IMO 9974400
63,264 2024
4.1
C
1419 FEDERAL MASAMUNE
IMO 9908310
62,464 2021
4.1
C
1421 LOCARNO
IMO 9461453
82,188 2011
4.1
C
1418 NEW EXPLORER
IMO 9481489
79,448 2014
4.1
C
1424 GREAT QIN
IMO 9766918
64,928 2017
4.1
C
1422 JAHAN I
IMO 9817535
61,221 2018
4.1
C
1417 MARKET COOPER
IMO 9874557
61,223 2015
4.1
C
1423 CL FUZHOU HE
IMO 9890630
63,125 2021
4.1
C
1425 SPAR PAVO
IMO 9735012
63,266 2016
4.1
C
1426 VAN HANNAH
IMO 9965021
63,926 2023
4.1
C
1431 XIN HUA
IMO 9316153
55,435 2005
4.1
C
1436 ONE OCEAN
IMO 9460904
82,654 2009
4.1
C
1430 XIN BO
IMO 9324655
52,424 2006
4.1
C
1435 VICTORIA
IMO 9738466
61,613 2016
4.1
C
1434 STAR AMETHYST
IMO 9523251
82,123 2009
4.1
C
1433 ALGOMA VICTORY
IMO 9138109
70,037 2000
4.1
C
1429 ARTEMIS E
IMO 9657789
63,200 2011
4.1
C
1428 LILAS CALM
IMO 9633264
61,473 2012
4.1
C
1427 ALASIA
IMO 9700873
61,311 2014
4.1
C
1432 GRAMBA
IMO 9917048
61,233 2021
4.1
C
1440 GOOD HEART
IMO 9669380
62,996 2014
4.1
C
1439 GREAT PROGRESS
IMO 9728655
63,377 2015
4.1
C
1438 YM IMPRESSION
IMO 9764001
81,914 2016
4.1
C
1444 CRIMSON SPOONBILL
IMO 9701712
60,033 2016
4.1
C
1443 ZHENG ZHI
IMO 9596090
81,804 2013
4.1
C
1442 SANTA BRISA
IMO 9951771
63,367 2023
4.1
C
1441 NEW VENTURE
IMO 9497622
79,415 2014
4.1
C
1437 SM SAMCHEONPO
IMO 9842487
80,943 2019
4.1
C
1450 MAMA STRENGTH
IMO 9673525
75,610 2014
4.1
C
1449 BEI LUN HAI SHI
IMO 9207766
75,971 2001
4.1
C
1448 WECO TATI
IMO 1027017
63,590 2025
4.1
C
1447 ST. SOFIA
IMO 9799630
60,424 2018
4.1
C
1446 IOANNIS
IMO 9760158
60,402 2016
4.1
C
1445 XIN HAI TONG 805
IMO 9618678
81,805 2012
4.1
C
Page 29 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.