Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#12 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
3.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
-65% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,477 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 MSC CALAIS
IMO 9975600
131,034 2025
2.9
A
2 CMA CGM ARGON
IMO 9996692
147,196 2025
3.1
A
3 MSC MARIACRISTINA
IMO 9968279
16,000 TEU 2025
3.2
A
4 MSC SAVANNAH
IMO 9987342
16,000 TEU 2025
3.2
A
5 MSC OLIVIA
IMO 9954761
15,500 TEU 2024
3.2
A
6 MSC GIOIA TAURO
IMO 9946738
13,115 TEU 2025
3.3
A
7 MSC MILAN
IMO 9964235
15,576 TEU 2024
3.4
A
8 MSC PALERMO
IMO 9964223
15,600 TEU 2024
3.4
A
9 MSC MARIAGRAZIA
IMO 9964194
15,600 TEU 2024
3.4
A
10 MSC ANNABELLA
IMO 9963592
15,600 TEU 2025
3.4
A
11 MSC CARMELA
IMO 9968281
16,000 TEU 2025
3.4
A
12 MSC NAPOLI
IMO 9964209
15,600 TEU 2024
3.5
A
14 MSC GERMANY
IMO 9987316
16,000 TEU 2025
3.5
A
13 ONE INNOVATION
IMO 9939137
23,000 TEU 2023
3.5
A
15 MSC MARIE LESLIE
IMO 9968310
16,000 TEU 2025
3.5
A
16 MSC ROME
IMO 9964211
15,600 TEU 2024
3.5
A
17 MSC NERANO
IMO 9963607
15,600 TEU 2025
3.5
A
18 OOCL FINLAND
IMO 9922536
24,188 TEU 2024
3.5
A
19 MSC CATANIA
IMO 9964247
15,576 TEU 2024
3.5
A
20 ONE INTEGRITY
IMO 9933119
24,000 TEU 2023
3.5
A
21 SINGAPORE EXPRESS
IMO 9543093
23,660 TEU 2024
3.5
A
22 ONE INSPIRATION
IMO 9939149
23,000 TEU 2023
3.5
A
23 HANOI EXPRESS
IMO 9540132
23,660 TEU 2023
3.5
A
24 MSC VIOLA
IMO 9947172
16,000 TEU 2024
3.6
A
25 MSC MARTINA MARIA
IMO 9540077
15,128 TEU 2023
3.6
A
26 MSC DOLETTE
IMO 9968293
16,000 TEU 2025
3.6
A
27 MSC SALERNO
IMO 9968322
16,000 TEU 2025
3.6
A
28 ONE INGENUITY
IMO 9933016
24,000 TEU 2023
3.6
A
30 MSC ELEONORE
IMO 9954735
15,500 TEU 2024
3.6
A
29 CMA CGM SEINE
IMO 9987196
23,104 TEU 2025
3.6
A
32 MSC STACEY
IMO 9954759
15,500 TEU 2024
3.7
A
31 MSC VERONA
IMO 9987287
16,000 TEU 2024
3.7
A
33 MSC AZRA
IMO 9932919
15,600 TEU 2023
3.7
A
34 MSC ARINA
IMO 9839284
22,000 TEU 2019
3.7
A
36 MSC PERLE
IMO 9503732
13,092 TEU 2013
3.7
A
35 ASTRID MAERSK
IMO 9948750
14,942 TEU 2021
3.7
A
37 ALEXANDRA MAERSK
IMO 9948786
16,592 TEU 2024
3.7
A
38 ANTONIA MAERSK
IMO 9948762
16,592 TEU 2024
3.7
A
39 ADRIAN MAERSK
IMO 9948815
16,592 TEU 2024
3.7
A
40 MSC ISCHIA
IMO 9963633
15,600 TEU 2025
3.7
A
41 OOCL ABU DHABI
IMO 9922524
24,188 TEU 2024
3.7
A
42 CMA CGM SAINT GERMAIN
IMO 9987201
23,876 TEU 2025
3.8
A
45 BERLIN MAERSK
IMO 9984560
17,148 TEU 2026
3.8
A
44 CMA CGM RIVOLI
IMO 9839193
22,448 TEU 2021
3.8
A
43 ONE INFINITY
IMO 9933004
24,000 TEU 2023
3.8
A
46 HMM ALGECIRAS
IMO 9863297
23,000 TEU 2020
3.8
A
47 MSC JOSEFINA
IMO 9968308
16,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
50 MSC BERANGERE
IMO 9930947
15,500 TEU 2023
3.8
A
49 MSC TANZANIA
IMO 9978731
14,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
48 HMM AMETHYST
IMO 9944467
13,248 TEU 2024
3.8
A
Page 1 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.