Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#993 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
-21% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 SANTA ISABEL
IMO 9444728
7,090 TEU 2010
8.0
C
956 GSL TRIPOLI
IMO 9437048
5,301 TEU 2009
8.0
C
955 ROTTERDAM
IMO 9398450
10,062 TEU 2010
8.0
C
954 EVER LIVING
IMO 9629031
8,488 TEU 2011
8.0
C
953 MSC MANZANILLO
IMO 9289960
5,060 TEU 2005
8.0
C
952 YM EVOLUTION
IMO 9496460
4,662 TEU 2009
8.0
C
957 C HAMBURG
IMO 9450375
8,580 TEU 2009
8.0
C
960 EVER LEGION
IMO 9604110
8,000 TEU 2010
8.0
C
959 EXPRESS ROME
IMO 9484936
10,114 TEU 2011
8.0
C
958 SANTA TERESA
IMO 9430375
7,114 TEU 2011
8.0
C
961 GJERTRUD MAERSK
IMO 9320233
6,600 TEU 2003
8.0
C
962 JOLLY VERDE
IMO 9320441
6,336 TEU 2007
8.0
C
963 MSC FIAMMETTA
IMO 9369758
5,800 TEU 2008
8.0
C
965 LARS MAERSK
IMO 9294379
4,300 TEU 2004
8.0
C
964 ANTWERP
IMO 9398448
10,062 TEU 2009
8.0
C
967 PORT GDYNIA
IMO 9334387
3,091 TEU 2011
8.0
C
966 SFL HAWAII
IMO 9679555
6,845 TEU 2012
8.0
C
968 ORCA I
IMO 9318113
5,095 TEU 2006
8.0
C
970 MSC SHANGHAI V
IMO 9231822
4,800 TEU 2000
8.0
C
969 JOLLY ORO
IMO 9450313
4,616 TEU 2009
8.0
C
971 MAERSK DENVER
IMO 9332999
6,188 TEU 2007
8.0
C
973 MAERSK NUBA
IMO 9356115
2,478 TEU 2008
8.0
C
972 ASTERIOS
IMO 9951135
1,800 TEU 2021
8.0
C
974 MSC ROSHNEY V
IMO 9337676
4,888 TEU 2007
8.1
C
977 CMA CGM COLUMBIA
IMO 9722663
9,894 TEU 2015
8.1
C
976 ARICA EXPRESS
IMO 9495765
4,620 TEU 2013
8.1
C
975 HYUNDAI TOKYO
IMO 9305673
6,800 TEU 2006
8.1
C
979 OOCL SEOUL
IMO 9417244
8,063 TEU 2006
8.1
C
978 CONTI CHIVALRY
IMO 9293791
8,084 TEU 2006
8.1
C
980 VENTO DI MAESTRALE
IMO 9985021
1,800 TEU 2015
8.1
C
981 GSL TINOS
IMO 9437050
5,301 TEU 2010
8.1
C
982 MSC AZOV
IMO 9605255
9,403 TEU 2014
8.1
C
983 MSC KALAMATA VII
IMO 9244946
6,644 TEU 2003
8.1
C
985 SEASPAN HAMBURG
IMO 9224300
4,253 TEU 2001
8.1
C
984 MSC PAMIRA III
IMO 9239903
2,496 TEU 2002
8.1
C
987 JOLLY BIANCO
IMO 9320427
6,336 TEU 2006
8.2
C
986 PUSAN C
IMO 9307229
9,572 TEU 2006
8.2
C
988 COSTA RICA EXPRESS
IMO 9641235
6,900 TEU 2013
8.2
C
989 CMA CGM PUGET
IMO 9248124
4,396 TEU 2002
8.2
C
990 MSC SUEZ
IMO 8918978
3,005 TEU 1993
8.2
C
992 MSC SHRISTI
IMO 9293442
4,738 TEU 2005
8.2
C
991 MSC ORNELLA
IMO 9281267
5,059 TEU 2004
8.2
C
993 VISTULA MAERSK
IMO 9775737
3,700 TEU 2018
8.2
C
994 HAWK I
IMO 9960564
5,300 TEU 2024
8.2
C
996 MSC LEIGH
IMO 9320439
4,870 TEU 2006
8.2
C
995 MSC ALICANTE
IMO 9480174
5,550 TEU 2011
8.2
C
1000 CMA CGM FIDELIO
IMO 9299642
9,415 TEU 2006
8.2
C
999 VUOKSI MAERSK
IMO 9775775
3,700 TEU 2018
8.2
C
998 SANTA CLARA
IMO 9444716
7,090 TEU 2010
8.2
C
997 LE HAVRE
IMO 9307243
9,572 TEU 2006
8.2
C
Page 20 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.