Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#35 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
3.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-63% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 MSC CALAIS
IMO 9975600
131,034 2025
2.9
A
2 CMA CGM ARGON
IMO 9996692
147,196 2025
3.1
A
3 MSC MARIACRISTINA
IMO 9968279
16,000 TEU 2024
3.2
A
4 MSC SAVANNAH
IMO 9987342
16,000 TEU 2025
3.2
A
5 MSC OLIVIA
IMO 9954761
15,500 TEU 2025
3.2
A
6 MSC GIOIA TAURO
IMO 9946738
13,115 TEU 2025
3.3
A
7 MSC MILAN
IMO 9964235
15,576 TEU 2024
3.4
A
8 MSC PALERMO
IMO 9964223
15,600 TEU 2024
3.4
A
9 MSC MARIAGRAZIA
IMO 9964194
15,600 TEU 2024
3.4
A
10 MSC ANNABELLA
IMO 9963592
15,600 TEU 2025
3.4
A
11 MSC CARMELA
IMO 9968281
16,000 TEU 2025
3.4
A
12 OOCL FINLAND
IMO 9922536
24,188 TEU 2020
3.5
A
13 MSC NAPOLI
IMO 9964209
15,600 TEU 2024
3.5
A
15 MSC GERMANY
IMO 9987316
16,000 TEU 2025
3.5
A
14 ONE INNOVATION
IMO 9939137
23,000 TEU 2023
3.5
A
16 MSC MARIE LESLIE
IMO 9968310
16,000 TEU 2025
3.5
A
17 MSC ROME
IMO 9964211
15,600 TEU 2024
3.5
A
18 ALVA MAERSK
IMO 9961817
16,592 TEU 2021
3.5
A
19 MSC NERANO
IMO 9963607
15,600 TEU 2025
3.5
A
20 MSC CATANIA
IMO 9964247
15,576 TEU 2024
3.5
A
21 ONE INTEGRITY
IMO 9933119
24,000 TEU 2023
3.5
A
22 SINGAPORE EXPRESS
IMO 9543093
23,660 TEU 2024
3.5
A
23 ONE INSPIRATION
IMO 9939149
24,000 TEU 2020
3.5
A
24 HANOI EXPRESS
IMO 9540132
23,660 TEU 2023
3.5
A
25 MSC VIOLA
IMO 9947172
16,000 TEU 2025
3.6
A
26 MSC MARTINA MARIA
IMO 9540077
15,128 TEU 2023
3.6
A
27 MSC DOLETTE
IMO 9968293
16,000 TEU 2025
3.6
A
28 MSC SALERNO
IMO 9968322
16,000 TEU 2025
3.6
A
29 ONE INGENUITY
IMO 9933016
24,000 TEU 2023
3.6
A
31 CMA CGM SEINE
IMO 9987196
23,876 TEU 2025
3.6
A
30 MSC ELEONORE
IMO 9954735
15,500 TEU 2024
3.6
A
32 ANGELICA MAERSK
IMO 9948798
16,592 TEU 2021
3.7
A
33 MSC VERONA
IMO 9987287
16,000 TEU 2024
3.7
A
34 MSC STACEY
IMO 9954759
15,500 TEU 2025
3.7
A
36 MSC AZRA
IMO 9932919
15,600 TEU 2021
3.7
A
35 OOCL ABU DHABI
IMO 9922524
24,188 TEU 2020
3.7
A
37 MSC ARINA
IMO 9839284
23,656 TEU 2019
3.7
A
38 MSC PERLE
IMO 9503732
13,100 TEU 2013
3.7
A
40 ADRIAN MAERSK
IMO 9948815
16,592 TEU 2021
3.7
A
39 ARTHUR MAERSK
IMO 9961829
16,592 TEU 2021
3.7
A
41 MSC ISCHIA
IMO 9963633
15,600 TEU 2025
3.7
A
42 MSC FLORA
IMO 9978937
11,400 TEU 2022
3.7
A
43 CMA CGM SAINT GERMAIN
IMO 9987201
23,876 TEU 2025
3.8
A
44 BERLIN MAERSK
IMO 9984560
17,148 TEU 2022
3.8
A
47 ONE INFINITY
IMO 9933004
24,000 TEU 2023
3.8
A
46 CMA CGM RIVOLI
IMO 9839193
23,000 TEU 2021
3.8
A
45 ALBERT MAERSK
IMO 9961805
16,592 TEU 2021
3.8
A
49 HMM ALGECIRAS
IMO 9863297
23,964 TEU 2020
3.8
A
48 MSC JOSEFINA
IMO 9968308
16,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
50 HMM AMETHYST
IMO 9944467
13,248 TEU 2024
3.8
A
Page 1 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.