Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#775 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-30% greener
B
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
752 MSC ANCHORAGE
IMO 9619440
8,762 TEU 2013
7.2
B
751 SOFIA EXPRESS
IMO 9450404
8,600 TEU 2010
7.2
B
755 HUDSON EXPRESS
IMO 9349564
6,435 TEU 2008
7.2
B
754 MSC BHAVYA V
IMO 9297876
5,018 TEU 2005
7.2
B
753 MSC INDIA
IMO 9231248
5,762 TEU 2002
7.2
B
756 HUMEN BRIDGE
IMO 9302164
8,212 TEU 2007
7.2
B
758 EPAMINONDAS
IMO 9153862
6,690 TEU 1998
7.2
B
757 HYUNDAI JAKARTA
IMO 9323522
6,763 TEU 2007
7.2
B
759 ILONA
IMO 9225641
6,750 TEU 2001
7.2
B
762 ZIM YANTIAN
IMO 9305582
9,383 TEU 2006
7.2
B
761 COLOMBO EXPRESS
IMO 9295244
8,235 TEU 2005
7.2
B
760 AL MANAMAH
IMO 9349538
6,435 TEU 2008
7.2
B
763 MAERSK LAMANAI
IMO 9527051
8,700 TEU 2013
7.2
B
766 ONE HENRY HUDSON
IMO 9302176
8,212 TEU 2008
7.2
B
765 MAERSK SEMBAWANG
IMO 9315226
5,648 TEU 2007
7.2
B
764 TOCONAO
IMO 9627899
8,704 TEU 2013
7.2
B
768 COSCO SHIPPING VOLGA
IMO 9731925
9,092 TEU 2017
7.2
B
767 MSC SARA ELENA
IMO 9702261
8,800 TEU 2015
7.2
B
771 ACHELOOS
IMO 9972995
2,800 TEU 2024
7.2
B
770 CMA CGM EXCELLENCE
IMO 9948217
6,963 TEU 2023
7.2
B
769 CAP SAN TAINARO
IMO 9633965
9,600 TEU 2014
7.2
B
772 MSC TUXPAN
IMO 9289972
5,060 TEU 2005
7.2
B
773 CMA CGM EXEMPLARITY
IMO 9948229
6,874 TEU 2023
7.2
B
774 ZIM YANGTZE
IMO 9954175
5,500 TEU 2024
7.2
B
778 MSC UBERTY VIII
IMO 9337444
8,241 TEU 2008
7.2
B
777 SANTA ROSA
IMO 9430363
7,114 TEU 2007
7.2
B
776 MSC MICHAELA
IMO 9230488
6,730 TEU 2002
7.2
B
775 AL SAFAT
IMO 9349497
6,435 TEU 2008
7.2
B
780 ONE HELSINKI
IMO 9588081
8,930 TEU 2012
7.3
B
779 WIKING
IMO 9708382
4,771 TEU 2016
7.3
B
781 MSC CLEA
IMO 9720524
9,411 TEU 2016
7.3
B
784 CMA CGM RABELAIS
IMO 9406635
6,570 TEU 2010
7.3
B
783 MSC PAMELA
IMO 9290531
9,200 TEU 2005
7.3
B
782 MSC JUSTICE VIII
IMO 9450351
8,400 TEU 2010
7.3
B
785 MSC MELISSA
IMO 9226918
6,730 TEU 2002
7.3
B
786 CMA CGM AMAZON
IMO 9706308
9,288 TEU 2015
7.3
B
787 AGIOS DIMITRIOS
IMO 9349605
6,500 TEU 2011
7.3
B
789 HENRIKA SCHULTE
IMO 9535163
5,605 TEU 2011
7.3
B
788 RHINE MAERSK
IMO 9456991
4,500 TEU 2012
7.3
B
793 MSC MAXINE
IMO 9720287
9,400 TEU 2015
7.3
B
792 LAURA MAERSK
IMO 9944546
2,100 TEU 2023
7.3
B
791 MSC DARIEN
IMO 9243394
7,731 TEU 2003
7.3
B
790 CZECH
IMO 9723241
9,040 TEU 2015
7.3
B
794 CMA CGM BETTER WAYS
IMO 9950557
6,963 TEU 2023
7.3
B
795 YOKOHAMA EXPRESS
IMO 9630418
10,100 TEU 2015
7.3
B
796 LONDON EXPRESS
IMO 9143568
4,612 TEU 1998
7.3
B
800 NYK VENUS
IMO 9312793
9,012 TEU 2007
7.3
B
799 MSC ENGLAND
IMO 9232890
4,132 TEU 2001
7.3
B
798 MSC FIAMMETTA
IMO 9369758
5,770 TEU 2008
7.3
B
797 GREEN PARK
IMO 9983449
2,954 TEU 2024
7.3
B
Page 16 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.