TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#569 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-30% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 625 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

119
Q4
133
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
136
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,971 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,921 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,886 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,886 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,872 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,828 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,147
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,873–11,643M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,147 of 1,147 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
559 PEAK MATTERHORN
IMO 9731822
81,060 2016
3.4
A
558 ANGLO JESSICA
IMO 9490480
114,664 2010
3.4
A
557 AFRICAN DRAGON
IMO 9990416
66,647 2024
3.4
A
556 HSL NASSAU
IMO 9802310
63,805 2020
3.4
A
555 ULTRA OCELOT
IMO 9871191
81,901 2020
3.4
A
554 ARETI.GR
IMO 9789893
60,243 2017
3.4
A
553 AQUAGEMINI
IMO 9757010
60,238 2016
3.4
A
552 AQUAVITA TRUST
IMO 9826445
62,625 2019
3.4
A
551 AMO
IMO 9296626
82,214 2006
3.4
A
562 NEW ASCENT
IMO 9512290
82,179 2012
3.4
A
561 NAVIOS GALILEO
IMO 9326536
76,596 2006
3.4
A
563 DREAM STAR
IMO 9582996
81,909 2008
3.4
A
560 AQUAGEM
IMO 9950909
82,292 2023
3.4
A
568 OSHIMA JAPAN
IMO 9872975
62,661 2021
3.4
A
565 KONSTANTINOS D
IMO 9972608
63,516 2024
3.4
A
564 CRIMSON KINGDOM
IMO 9748033
84,860 2016
3.4
A
567 SKOMER ISLAND
IMO 9573854
61,510 2010
3.4
A
566 GOLDEN ERLING
IMO 9955571
85,000 2024
3.4
A
576 ARIES KARIN
IMO 9894478
64,229 2021
3.4
A
571 NORD ANTARES
IMO 9933224
82,258 2022
3.4
A
577 MAROUDIO
IMO 9815965
64,723 2022
3.4
A
570 ELATI
IMO 9836490
81,746 2019
3.4
A
569 MAGMA INTEGRITY
IMO 9967677
63,697 2023
3.4
A
575 AMALIA
IMO 9770634
81,783 2019
3.4
A
574 RICHARD OLDENDORFF
IMO 9462366
121,354 2011
3.4
A
573 AL KARAMA
IMO 9801732
63,878 2019
3.4
A
572 CALYPSO V
IMO 9381213
76,596 2007
3.4
A
581 KAMILLA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9952452
82,245 2024
3.4
A
580 JIMMY T
IMO 9782118
81,704 2017
3.4
A
582 ROYAL HOPE
IMO 9726762
81,011 2015
3.4
A
579 MEGHNA PIONEER
IMO 9894466
64,276 2020
3.4
A
585 TRANSCENDEN STAR
IMO 9928231
84,953 2022
3.4
A
584 CL GENEVA
IMO 9911587
85,229 2021
3.4
A
583 YASA VENUS
IMO 9848118
61,075 2019
3.4
A
578 SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
81,938 2015
3.4
A
588 OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
82,024 2019
3.4
A
590 INCE ANADOLU
IMO 9527271
76,619 2009
3.4
A
587 AXIOS
IMO 9706542
81,960 2017
3.4
A
593 BELMAR
IMO 9908475
63,641 2021
3.4
A
592 MAMMA MIA
IMO 9846548
60,446 2019
3.4
A
586 TIANA
IMO 9317470
77,283 2008
3.4
A
589 MAGSENGER 10
IMO 9497268
115,301 2012
3.4
A
591 KEY FUTURE
IMO 9512329
82,099 2012
3.4
A
600 BESIKTAS KAZAKHSTAN
IMO 9461271
169,263 2010
3.4
A
599 GREEN K-MAX 6
IMO 9862621
80,890 2020
3.4
A
598 RB JAKE
IMO 9765706
81,039 2016
3.4
A
597 SHANDONG FU REN
IMO 9748784
81,783 2018
3.4
A
596 AIANTAS
IMO 9729879
81,111 2016
3.4
A
595 LONG SHAN HU
IMO 9238507
76,679 2002
3.4
A
594 SHARQI
IMO 9964845
66,316 2023
3.4
A
Page 12 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.