Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#442 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-32% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
401 STAR LYDIA
IMO 9673795
81,187 2013
3.1
A
405 BETEIGEUZE
IMO 9313280
77,089 2007
3.1
A
404 ATTALIA
IMO 9423360
82,171 2010
3.1
A
403 XH SQUARE LEG
IMO 1019852
83,055 2024
3.1
A
402 PAN NAVIGATOR
IMO 9805685
82,079 2019
3.1
A
407 ROSTRUM HEDONIST
IMO 9955894
82,178 2023
3.1
A
406 CANARIAS
IMO 1067017
82,221 2025
3.1
A
408 YM COURAGE
IMO 9959943
81,980 2023
3.1
A
411 BASTIONS
IMO 9431173
119,376 2011
3.1
A
417 INTERCEPTOR
IMO 9835965
82,009 2019
3.1
A
410 BBG GUIJIANG
IMO 9971939
82,799 2024
3.1
A
418 EVER EXCELLENT
IMO 9899806
81,935 2021
3.1
A
409 GH HELM
IMO 9438781
180,018 2009
3.1
A
416 ALPHA PRIDE
IMO 9827528
82,032 2019
3.1
A
415 DONATELLO
IMO 1030818
82,000 2025
3.1
A
414 SAFEEN AL AMAN
IMO 9490129
83,027 2012
3.1
A
413 LOWLANDS PATRASCHE
IMO 9979137
63,458 2024
3.1
A
412 BTG MISTI
IMO 9952488
82,235 2023
3.1
A
422 IRINA
IMO 9723655
81,600 2013
3.2
A
424 ORANGE HARMONY
IMO 9764099
81,739 2017
3.2
A
421 FOXTON
IMO 9966582
90,029 2021
3.2
A
427 AMAZING SALUTE
IMO 9477232
107,288 2011
3.2
A
426 BULK FINLAND
IMO 9691577
77,126 2010
3.2
A
425 OWUSU MARU
IMO 9888479
82,506 2020
3.2
A
420 JAG AKSHAY
IMO 9706554
82,044 2016
3.2
A
419 TEKUNG BENEFIT
IMO 9984168
63,553 2024
3.2
A
423 OLIVIA C
IMO 9710555
81,800 2015
3.2
A
428 JAG AJAY
IMO 9723849
82,000 2016
3.2
A
431 SKIATHOS
IMO 9952476
82,219 2023
3.2
A
433 XIN HAI TONG 811
IMO 9639567
81,504 2013
3.2
A
430 JOSCO SHENGZHOU
IMO 9934175
64,250 2022
3.2
A
435 PRT KAHO
IMO 9701152
77,113 2014
3.2
A
434 NAVIOS BUENA VENTURA
IMO 9481233
179,108 2006
3.2
A
429 MAGMA TENACITY
IMO 9967689
63,710 2022
3.2
A
432 EMERALD PUTUO
IMO 9936240
85,610 2022
3.2
A
437 BORA
IMO 9607112
81,682 2014
3.2
A
439 WOOYANG IVY
IMO 9782326
63,590 2017
3.2
A
436 CYMONA PRIDE
IMO 9694488
78,056 2014
3.2
A
441 NORD KARAS
IMO 9552991
82,354 2016
3.2
A
440 ATLANTIC BONANZA
IMO 9952505
82,143 2024
3.2
A
438 SPIKE
IMO 9976628
64,046 2024
3.2
A
450 GOLDEN FRIDGE
IMO 9955595
84,508 2021
3.2
A
449 NAVIOS LIBRA
IMO 9852925
82,011 2019
3.2
A
448 XING FU HAI
IMO 9949302
85,038 2022
3.2
A
447 NORD ANDROMEDA
IMO 9929390
82,251 2022
3.2
A
446 PAN CONCORD
IMO 9966855
82,814 2024
3.2
A
445 CHAMPIONSHIP
IMO 9403516
179,238 2011
3.2
A
444 ULTRA LEOPARD
IMO 9758428
81,777 2016
3.2
A
443 ATHINA ZAFIRAKIS
IMO 9801201
81,630 2014
3.2
A
442 FJ CAMELIA
IMO 9911769
82,501 2021
3.2
A
Page 9 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.