Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#625 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-29% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 629 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

119
Q4
134
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
136
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,937 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,988 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,794 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,794 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,025 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,143
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,999–11,933M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,143 of 1,143 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
595 SHARQI
IMO 9964845
66,316 2023
3.4
A
594 LONG SHAN HU
IMO 9238507
76,679 2002
3.4
A
606 YASA TEAM
IMO 9296250
75,621 2006
3.4
A
605 MSC CARINA
IMO 9625944
104,183 2013
3.4
A
608 CL PEKING
IMO 9911599
85,174 2021
3.4
A
604 HARVEST TIME
IMO 9643881
95,263 2015
3.4
A
616 KOULITSA 2
IMO 9639684
78,129 2013
3.4
A
609 LIME ALINA
IMO 9948425
84,990 2022
3.4
A
603 ZHENG FAN
IMO 9296858
87,052 2005
3.4
A
615 LV STAR
IMO 9553218
79,252 2012
3.4
A
614 EFE MERSIN
IMO 9792022
60,293 2017
3.4
A
613 AQUAGRACE
IMO 9764087
81,672 2017
3.4
A
612 MEGHNA LEGACY
IMO 9846275
63,449 2014
3.4
A
611 MELTEMI
IMO 9952402
82,206 2022
3.4
A
610 MEGHNA ADVENTURE
IMO 9805764
62,472 2018
3.4
A
607 DARYA AUM
IMO 9768605
81,109 2018
3.4
A
617 LEMESSOS WIND
IMO 9516399
76,523 2009
3.4
A
620 SDTR DORA
IMO 9859026
81,780 2019
3.5
A
619 BULK CONCORD
IMO 9516387
76,600 2009
3.5
A
621 ROLAND OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463633
121,448 2011
3.5
A
618 KALEY
IMO 9700689
63,261 2015
3.5
A
624 PORT OSAKA
IMO 9838541
62,716 2019
3.5
A
622 ARIETTA LILY
IMO 9727479
81,773 2017
3.5
A
623 HG HAMBURG
IMO 9954981
64,199 2024
3.5
A
625 SDTR GLORIA
IMO 9877896
84,984 2022
3.5
A
627 NAVIOS CITRINE
IMO 9782170
81,626 2017
3.5
A
630 PAC CHRISTINA
IMO 9913690
63,088 2022
3.5
A
629 BERGE TATEYAMA
IMO 9866706
63,511 2020
3.5
A
628 SPIRIT OF HO-PING
IMO 9433638
82,152 2011
3.5
A
631 PORT KYOTO
IMO 9942093
63,733 2022
3.5
A
626 EXCELSIOR DIVA
IMO 9960198
63,739 2023
3.5
A
640 MAGIC PERSEUS
IMO 9582477
82,158 2013
3.5
A
633 ACRUX AMELIA
IMO 9909194
82,577 2021
3.5
A
632 AEOLIAN BREEZE
IMO 9620621
78,092 2012
3.5
A
641 DE MING HAI
IMO 9364746
76,432 2008
3.5
A
639 ZHONG CHANG ZHOU SHAN
IMO 9670808
75,409 2013
3.5
A
638 BULK SWEDEN
IMO 9691589
77,126 2010
3.5
A
637 KM HAKATA
IMO 9659830
95,349 2013
3.5
A
636 RANGER
IMO 9493999
82,172 2012
3.5
A
635 BESKIDY
IMO 9582958
82,138 2013
3.5
A
634 AQUALIBRA
IMO 9765603
63,948 2018
3.5
A
650 NORD SUNDA
IMO 9860738
63,343 2019
3.5
A
649 VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
81,886 2016
3.5
A
648 GCL ICON
IMO 9880245
82,576 2021
3.5
A
647 CS HANGZHOU
IMO 9830070
81,600 2019
3.5
A
646 IDOMENEAS
IMO 9448035
114,167 2010
3.5
A
645 BBG HONOR
IMO 9702716
81,917 2015
3.5
A
644 PLAINPALAIS
IMO 9739032
81,756 2015
3.5
A
643 ULTRA JAGUAR
IMO 9723136
81,922 2016
3.5
A
642 SAKIZAYA ELEGANCE
IMO 9713806
81,938 2015
3.5
A
Page 13 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.