Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#546 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-31% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 631 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

120
Q4
134
'27 Q1
86
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
135
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,937 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,866 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,674 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,674 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,025 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,141
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,999–11,933M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,141 of 1,141 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
504 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.3
A
501 BEAVER
IMO 9746695
81,769 2017
3.3
A
499 GRAND OCEAN
IMO 9949651
82,689 2023
3.3
A
503 JOLANDA
IMO 9724867
180,579 2015
3.3
A
502 YILDIZLAR 4
IMO 9502568
49,775 2008
3.3
A
511 AP DUBROVNIK
IMO 9952660
82,249 2023
3.3
A
510 JING LU HAI
IMO 9747558
77,927 2015
3.3
A
509 BBG HECHI
IMO 9929039
82,037 2022
3.3
A
508 LIVORNO
IMO 9855549
81,651 2019
3.3
A
507 TORO
IMO 9443009
76,636 2008
3.3
A
512 ASTRO SIRIUS
IMO 9848077
63,562 2019
3.3
A
506 MAIA
IMO 9422938
82,193 2009
3.3
A
513 HAMPTON OCEAN
IMO 9798844
80,979 2017
3.3
A
517 PORT OSHIMA
IMO 9932804
64,624 2022
3.3
A
520 PISTI
IMO 9893503
81,737 2021
3.3
A
516 NORD POLARIS
IMO 9728198
81,791 2016
3.3
A
523 NEFELI
IMO 9317468
77,171 2009
3.3
A
522 SEACON SHANGHAI
IMO 9847889
80,811 2019
3.3
A
521 LOWLANDS FREEDOM
IMO 9942158
64,481 2023
3.3
A
515 MONDIAL COSMOS
IMO 9801196
81,611 2017
3.3
A
519 ATHINA II
IMO 9724192
82,014 2015
3.3
A
514 ATROTOS HERACLES
IMO 9668879
81,922 2014
3.3
A
518 CHASSELAS
IMO 9840506
81,758 2019
3.3
A
525 BBG GRACE
IMO 9702704
81,952 2015
3.4
A
524 KYOTO STAR
IMO 9740811
84,956 2016
3.4
A
526 MARTINE
IMO 9411537
86,949 2009
3.4
A
530 KEY FRONTIER
IMO 9454292
80,679 2011
3.4
A
529 ARIANA
IMO 9828297
81,011 2019
3.4
A
532 THREE SASKIAS
IMO 9689811
81,094 2014
3.4
A
528 SPAR MAIA
IMO 1015155
63,550 2024
3.4
A
531 IONIC KIBOU
IMO 9582556
81,889 2015
3.4
A
527 VOLUTINA
IMO 9929338
82,408 2022
3.4
A
537 MARINE GLORY
IMO 9606754
114,047 2014
3.4
A
539 STAR MARIA
IMO 9401489
82,598 2007
3.4
A
536 SFERA
IMO 9304576
76,801 2006
3.4
A
535 MSXT THALIA
IMO 9929326
85,204 2022
3.4
A
534 DIAMOND POWER
IMO 9566590
107,235 2013
3.4
A
533 YASA MARS
IMO 9848120
61,081 2019
3.4
A
538 XING FU HAI
IMO 9949302
85,038 2022
3.4
A
543 ROYAL PEARL
IMO 9941972
63,535 2023
3.4
A
544 ASIAN ETERNITY
IMO 9991472
64,683 2024
3.4
A
542 ASTRO VEGA
IMO 9720299
63,008 2015
3.4
A
545 ANNA-DOROTHEA
IMO 9482213
55,646 2008
3.4
A
541 DARYA MA
IMO 9591674
81,874 2011
3.4
A
540 S SAMBA
IMO 9712486
84,867 2013
3.4
A
550 ANGLO JESSICA
IMO 9490480
114,664 2010
3.4
A
549 POMONE
IMO 9926130
82,247 2021
3.4
A
548 AQUAGEMINI
IMO 9757010
60,238 2016
3.4
A
547 PRISCILLA
IMO 9880221
82,543 2020
3.4
A
546 AQUAVITA TRUST
IMO 9826445
62,625 2019
3.4
A
Page 11 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.