Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#276 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

5.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.39)

-52% greener

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,080 at D/E

A 313B 411C 706D 598E 482

2,510 rated vessels · 553 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

100

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

119

'28 Q1

105

'28 Q2

'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,612	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,443	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,346	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	903	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	744	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	370	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

636

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,195–7,560M

capex range, top measure per vessel (636 of 636 with computable scaling)

1.48–2.63 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Dec 2027
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k	E	1y	2026	72%	Oct 2027
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Jul 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
C LION · 100-200k	E	21y	2026	59%	Feb 2028

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.41

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
252	EVER ACT IMO 9893905	23,764 TEU	2021	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92	4.8	A
251	ONE MINATO IMO 9805477	14,000 TEU	2018	366 m	Mitsui - 11S90ME-C9	4.8	A
255	YM WONDERLAND IMO 9820910	14,000 TEU	2019	366 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	4.9	A
254	MSC VIRGINIA IMO 9908059	14,000 TEU	2022	335 m	Wärtsilä - 9X92DF	4.9	A
257	MSC KAYLEY IMO 9927299	15,264 TEU	2023	366 m	MAN - 11G90ME-C10-GI	4.9	A
256	MAERSK HANGZHOU IMO 9784300	15,226 TEU	2018	353 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	4.9	A
253	EVER ACME IMO 9943267	24,000 TEU	2022	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92-B	4.9	A
259	MSC FATMA IMO 9927251	14,812 TEU	2022	366 m	MAN - 11G90ME-C10-GI	4.9	A
258	MSC SVEVA IMO 9708681	19,224 TEU	2015	395 m	Hyundai - 8S80ME-C9	4.9	A
260	ANGELICA MAERSK IMO 9948798	16,592 TEU	2021	351 m	MAN - 8G95ME-C10-LGIM	4.9	A
261	EVER ARM IMO 9893931	23,992 TEU	2022	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92-B	4.9	A
262	MSC HAMBURG IMO 9647461	19,000 TEU	2015	399 m	STX - 11S90ME-C9	4.9	A
266	MSC OLIVER IMO 9703306	19,224 TEU	2015	395 m	Hyundai - 8S80ME-C9	4.9	A
265	MARIT MAERSK IMO 9632167	18,270 TEU	2015	399 m	Doosan - 8S80ME-C9	4.9	A
264	MAERSK SAN CLEMENTE IMO 9699189	9,000 TEU	2013	300 m	HHI - W9X82	4.9	A
263	COSCO DEVELOPMENT IMO 9472139	13,092 TEU	2011	366 m	Hyundai - 12 K98MC	4.9	A
267	MSC MIRJAM IMO 9767376	16,909 TEU	2016	400 m	MAN - 11G95ME-C9	4.9	A
268	MAERSK HUACHO IMO 9848948	15,226 TEU	2019	353 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	4.9	A
269	HYUNDAI SATURN IMO 9725146	10,055 TEU	2016	324 m	MAN - 9G80ME-C9	4.9	A
270	SAN MARCO MAERSK IMO 9622215	9,669 TEU	2013	333 m	HHI - 7S90-C9.2	4.9	A
273	ONE FREEDOM IMO 9934357	15,000 TEU	2022	366 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C10-EGRTC	4.9	A
272	SAN NICOLAS MAERSK IMO 9622203	9,669 TEU	2013	333 m	HHI - 7S90-C9.2	4.9	A
271	MSC ZOE IMO 9703318	19,224 TEU	2015	395 m	Hyundai - 11S90ME-C10	4.9	A
274	EVER GREET IMO 9832729	20,160 TEU	2019	400 m	MAN - 11G95ME-C9	5.0	A
275	ALS FIDES IMO 9938315	7,100 TEU	2023	255 m	MAN - 6G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.0	A
276	ONE MANHATTAN IMO 9689615	13,900 TEU	2015	366 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9.2	5.0	A
277	COSCO SHIPPING GALAXY IMO 9795634	20,988 TEU	2019	400 m	CSSC - 12S90ME-C10	5.0	A
279	EVER GRADE IMO 9820855	20,124 TEU	2019	400 m	MAN - 11G95ME-C9	5.0	A
278	EVER AIM IMO 9893917	23,764 TEU	2021	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92-B	5.0	A
283	COSCO SHIPPING LIBRA IMO 9783538	20,038 TEU	2018	400 m	CSSC - 11S90ME-C10	5.0	A
282	MUNICH MAERSK IMO 9778806	19,630 TEU	2017	399 m	Doosan - 7G80ME-C9	5.0	A
281	CMA CGM GREENLAND IMO 9895006	15,000 TEU	2022	366 m	Wärtsilä - 10X92DF	5.0	A
280	MATZ MAERSK IMO 9619983	18,270 TEU	2014	399 m	Doosan - 8S80ME-C MK9.2 TIER II	5.0	A
284	CMA CGM IVANHOE IMO 9365805	9,661 TEU	2008	350 m	Wärtsilä - 12RTA96C	5.0	A
285	MSC DARIA IMO 9927287	14,812 TEU	2023	366 m	MAN - 11G90ME-C10-GI	5.0	A
286	MSC ISTANBUL IMO 9606326	16,652 TEU	2015	399 m	STX - 12K98MC-C	5.0	A
287	COSCO SHIPPING CAPRICORN IMO 9783514	19,150 TEU	2018	400 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C10	5.0	A
288	ONE FRIENDSHIP IMO 9934369	15,000 TEU	2023	366 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C10-EGRTC	5.0	A
289	CAPE SOUNIO IMO 9727625	11,010 TEU	2017	330 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	5.0	A
291	EVER ACE IMO 9893890	23,764 TEU	2021	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92-B	5.0	A
290	AL JASRAH IMO 9732321	14,993 TEU	2016	368 m	MAN - 9S90ME-C10	5.0	A
293	COSCO FAITH IMO 9472141	13,100 TEU	2012	366 m	Hyundai - 12 K98MC	5.0	A
292	MSC TINA IMO 9762340	19,170 TEU	2017	398 m	Doosan - 11G95ME-C9	5.0	A
297	MAERSK CAMPBELL IMO 9924209	15,500 TEU	2022	366 m	MAN - 9G95ME-C10	5.0	A
296	MSC LUCIANA IMO 9398383	11,668 TEU	2009	364 m	MAN - 12K98ME	5.0	A
295	EVER ATOP IMO 9893993	24,004 TEU	2022	400 m	Wärtsilä - 11X92	5.0	A
294	CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT IMO 9776432	20,954 TEU	2018	400 m	Hyundai - 11X92	5.0	A
299	MAERSK CINCINNATI IMO 9936410	15,500 TEU	2024	366 m	MAN - 8G95ME-C10	5.0	A
298	MSC DILETTA IMO 9897004	23,656 TEU	2021	400 m	Doosan - 9L32/40CD	5.0	A
300	AFIF IMO 9732345	14,993 TEU	2017	368 m	Hyundai - 9S90ME-C10	5.0	A

Page 6 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.