Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#71 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-61% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
51 MSC BERANGERE
IMO 9930947
15,500 TEU 2023
3.8
A
50 MSC SIMONA
IMO 9962615
202,562 2024
3.8
A
53 MSC TANZANIA
IMO 9978731
14,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
55 MSC OLBIA
IMO 9987299
16,000 TEU 2024
3.8
A
54 MSC ELISABETTA
IMO 9954747
15,500 TEU 2025
3.8
A
56 MSC THAIS
IMO 9957347
15,600 TEU 2021
3.8
A
58 ONE FORWARD
IMO 9936422
15,500 TEU 2024
3.8
A
57 MSC ALESSIA
IMO 9987330
16,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
59 MSC SIENA
IMO 9987275
16,000 TEU 2024
3.8
A
60 HMM DUBLIN
IMO 9863314
23,000 TEU 2020
3.8
A
62 MSC ISABELLA
IMO 9839272
23,656 TEU 2019
3.8
A
61 ONE FANTASTIC
IMO 9936381
15,500 TEU 2023
3.8
A
63 CMA CGM PALAIS ROYAL
IMO 9839181
23,000 TEU 2020
3.8
A
64 MARIT MAERSK
IMO 9632167
18,270 TEU 2011
3.9
A
65 CMA CGM COBALT
IMO 9996680
147,196 2025
3.9
A
67 ONE INTELLIGENCE
IMO 9933121
24,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
66 HMM HAMBURG
IMO 9863338
23,696 TEU 2020
3.9
A
68 HMM ST PETERSBURG
IMO 9868364
23,964 TEU 2020
3.9
A
69 MSC AUDREY
IMO 9540065
15,128 TEU 2023
3.9
A
70 ONE FUTURE
IMO 9936393
15,500 TEU 2024
3.9
A
71 CMA CGM JACQUES SAADE
IMO 9839179
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
72 HMM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9868338
23,820 TEU 2020
3.9
A
73 MSC CALYPSO
IMO 9932036
15,264 TEU 2023
3.9
A
77 OOCL PIRAEUS
IMO 9908097
23,000 TEU 2023
3.9
A
76 ONE STORK
IMO 9784788
14,000 TEU 2018
3.9
A
75 HMM LE HAVRE
IMO 9868314
23,696 TEU 2020
3.9
A
74 BEIJING MAERSK
IMO 9984572
17,148 TEU 2022
3.9
A
80 A. P. MOLLER
IMO 9948803
16,592 TEU 2021
3.9
A
84 OOCL FELIXSTOWE
IMO 9922512
24,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
79 ONE TRIBUTE
IMO 9769295
20,170 TEU 2017
3.9
A
83 HMM GDANSK
IMO 9863326
23,696 TEU 2020
3.9
A
82 MSC CARMELITA
IMO 9946879
16,000 TEU 2024
3.9
A
78 MSC ILARIA
IMO 9962586
202,562 2024
3.9
A
81 MSC ELENOIRE
IMO 9962603
202,562 2024
3.9
A
86 MSC MAURA
IMO 9962536
202,562 2024
3.9
A
85 MSC FATMA
IMO 9927251
14,812 TEU 2022
3.9
A
87 MSC BIANCA SILVIA
IMO 9930935
15,500 TEU 2023
3.9
A
88 HMM OSLO
IMO 9868326
23,820 TEU 2020
4.0
A
90 OOCL SWEDEN
IMO 9922603
24,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
89 ONE MEISHAN
IMO 9805465
13,900 TEU 2018
4.0
A
91 HMM HELSINKI
IMO 9863340
23,696 TEU 2020
4.0
A
92 CMA CGM ARCTIC
IMO 9867841
15,128 TEU 2022
4.0
A
95 ONE TRIUMPH
IMO 9769271
20,170 TEU 2017
4.0
A
94 ONE TRUST
IMO 9769283
20,100 TEU 2017
4.0
A
93 HMM COPENHAGEN
IMO 9863302
23,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
98 HMM SOUTHAMPTON
IMO 9868340
23,820 TEU 2020
4.0
A
97 AXEL MAERSK
IMO 9961831
16,592 TEU 2021
4.0
A
96 MSC GRACE
IMO 9987366
16,000 TEU 2025
4.0
A
100 ROTTERDAM EXPRESS
IMO 9943891
23,660 TEU 2025
4.0
A
99 ONE TRUTH
IMO 9773210
20,150 TEU 2017
4.0
A
Page 2 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.