Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#528 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-31% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
502 PISTI
IMO 9893503
81,737 2021
3.2
A
501 MEDI ARGENTARIO
IMO 9771298
89,499 2018
3.2
A
500 PATRICIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9464584
114,753 2010
3.2
A
499 NBA MAGRITTE
IMO 9512331
82,099 2013
3.2
A
496 ROYAL KALEIDO
IMO 9851505
80,871 2019
3.2
A
507 CASTILLO DE NAVIA
IMO 9722974
119,612 2015
3.2
A
495 W-LUNA
IMO 9756925
81,115 2016
3.2
A
494 PELOPIDAS
IMO 9501071
176,006 2011
3.2
A
508 LEM MARIGOLD
IMO 9845805
64,663 2020
3.2
A
511 SSI DISCOVERY
IMO 9969144
63,712 2023
3.3
A
512 MAXWELL
IMO 9782027
82,170 2017
3.3
A
510 AGIOS NIKOLAS
IMO 9702728
57,902 2014
3.3
A
515 SYLVANER
IMO 9947275
82,412 2023
3.3
A
514 SAKIZAYA POWER
IMO 9783136
81,938 2017
3.3
A
513 FLAG MARINA
IMO 9384928
106,349 2010
3.3
A
516 YM SPLENDOUR
IMO 9959424
82,715 2024
3.3
A
518 TM LUSTROUS
IMO 9897925
82,558 2021
3.3
A
520 GIA INSPIRATION
IMO 9948413
85,035 2022
3.3
A
519 TRANS ASIA
IMO 9935454
82,278 2022
3.3
A
517 GIA GLORY
IMO 9877913
84,997 2022
3.3
A
527 EVRYDIKI
IMO 9448023
114,168 2010
3.3
A
526 ROLAND OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463633
121,448 2007
3.3
A
525 NORDIC OSHIMA
IMO 9687227
76,180 2014
3.3
A
524 YI PENG5
IMO 9221190
76,099 2001
3.3
A
523 PETIT LANCY
IMO 9999814
82,585 2025
3.3
A
522 ORCHID ISLAND
IMO 9987251
81,996 2024
3.3
A
521 GOLDEN STAR
IMO 9950703
85,000 2021
3.3
A
528 HSL TAMPA
IMO 9781035
81,818 2017
3.3
A
529 SYNTHESEA
IMO 9697959
78,020 2015
3.3
A
536 ANGLO CYNOSURE
IMO 9599133
98,697 2012
3.3
A
541 STAR SAPPHIRE
IMO 9860037
82,000 2019
3.3
A
533 STAR KAMILA
IMO 9285043
82,769 2005
3.3
A
539 DIAMOND GLOBE
IMO 9828857
82,027 2018
3.3
A
538 CL YANGJIANG
IMO 9977373
64,771 2024
3.3
A
537 PACIFIC APEX
IMO 9916226
63,620 2021
3.3
A
532 AQUAVITA WEALTH
IMO 9985784
64,700 2024
3.3
A
535 BTG LOGAN
IMO 9952517
82,155 2024
3.3
A
534 TRUSTN TRADER
IMO 9937555
82,245 2023
3.3
A
531 SDM SHENYANG
IMO 9949261
64,317 2023
3.3
A
530 ALKIMOS HERACLES
IMO 9668881
81,922 2014
3.3
A
540 INDUS VICTORY
IMO 9563940
92,870 2006
3.3
A
550 NAVIOS PRIMAVERA
IMO 9947225
81,340 2022
3.3
A
549 NAVIOS SPHERA
IMO 9738818
84,872 2016
3.3
A
548 SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
81,938 2013
3.3
A
547 MYRTO C
IMO 9752383
81,011 2017
3.3
A
546 SUDETY
IMO 9582518
82,138 2013
3.3
A
545 SPIRIT OF HO-PING
IMO 9433638
82,152 2011
3.3
A
544 VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
81,886 2016
3.3
A
543 OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
82,024 2019
3.3
A
542 BASIC PASSION
IMO 1083425
82,073 2025
3.3
A
Page 11 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.