Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#220 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-56% greener
A
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
201 MSC LORENZA
IMO 9962598
202,562 2024
4.3
A
204 HMM STOCKHOLM
IMO 9868352
23,000 TEU 2020
4.4
A
203 OOCL VALENCIA
IMO 9922598
24,000 TEU 2020
4.4
A
202 MOSCOW MAERSK
IMO 9778818
20,568 TEU 2015
4.4
A
206 AXEL MAERSK
IMO 9961831
16,592 TEU 2025
4.4
A
205 MSC MARIE
IMO 9962574
202,562 2024
4.4
A
207 MSC ANNA
IMO 9777204
17,273 TEU 2016
4.4
A
209 OOCL DENMARK
IMO 9922548
24,188 TEU 2020
4.4
A
208 PARANA EXPRESS
IMO 9793909
11,800 TEU 2018
4.4
A
211 MAERSK MC-KINNEY MOLLER
IMO 9619907
18,270 TEU 2013
4.4
A
210 MAERSK HORSBURGH
IMO 9784269
15,282 TEU 2017
4.4
A
213 ONE CRANE
IMO 9741401
14,026 TEU 2016
4.4
A
212 HMM PROMISE
IMO 9742168
11,000 TEU 2018
4.4
A
215 MSC LORETO
IMO 9934735
24,000 TEU 2023
4.4
A
214 MAGLEBY MAERSK
IMO 9619957
18,270 TEU 2011
4.4
A
216 YM WONDERLAND
IMO 9820910
14,000 TEU 2015
4.4
A
217 MAERSK CAMPTON
IMO 9924211
15,500 TEU 2022
4.4
A
219 MSC CALYPSO
IMO 9932036
15,264 TEU 2023
4.4
A
218 ZEUS LUMOS
IMO 9864239
15,000 TEU 2021
4.4
A
220 MAERSK HONG KONG
IMO 9784257
15,282 TEU 2017
4.4
A
221 MAREN MAERSK
IMO 9632129
18,340 TEU 2014
4.4
A
223 MAERSK CHARLESTON
IMO 9936379
15,500 TEU 2023
4.4
A
222 MAERSK HANGZHOU
IMO 9784300
15,282 TEU 2015
4.4
A
226 ONE MAGDALENA
IMO 9937347
11,923 TEU 2022
4.4
A
225 YM TOPMOST
IMO 9878515
11,850 TEU 2021
4.4
A
224 ZIM SPINEL
IMO 9968035
7,000 TEU 2024
4.4
A
227 HMM PERIDOT
IMO 9955258
13,248 TEU 2024
4.4
A
229 MAERSK HIDALGO
IMO 9784283
15,282 TEU 2015
4.4
A
228 MSC APOLLINE
IMO 9896983
23,656 TEU 2021
4.4
A
230 CSCL ARCTIC OCEAN
IMO 9695169
19,000 TEU 2015
4.5
A
232 HMM NURI
IMO 9869162
14,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
233 ZEAL LUMOS
IMO 9864241
15,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
231 MSC NAMIBIA
IMO 9974553
8,300 TEU 2025
4.5
A
235 OOCL JAPAN
IMO 9776195
21,100 TEU 2017
4.5
A
234 MSC EDNA
IMO 1016680
139,394 2025
4.5
A
238 SAN LORENZO MAERSK
IMO 9622227
9,669 TEU 2011
4.5
A
237 MAERSK HUACHO
IMO 9848948
15,286 TEU 2019
4.5
A
236 MSC LONDON
IMO 9606302
16,652 TEU 2014
4.5
A
239 YM TRUTH
IMO 9860910
12,690 TEU 2020
4.5
A
240 MURCIA MAERSK
IMO 9780457
20,568 TEU 2015
4.5
A
242 MANCHESTER MAERSK
IMO 9780445
20,568 TEU 2018
4.5
A
241 MAERSK CANDOR
IMO 9924223
15,500 TEU 2022
4.5
A
243 CMA CGM TITAN
IMO 9399222
11,400 TEU 2011
4.5
A
244 MORTEN MAERSK
IMO 9632105
18,270 TEU 2014
4.5
A
250 OOCL GERMANY
IMO 9776183
21,100 TEU 2017
4.5
A
249 ONE MILANO
IMO 9757187
13,870 TEU 2018
4.5
A
248 ZEPHYR LUMOS
IMO 9864227
15,000 TEU 2021
4.5
A
247 MSC MUGE
IMO 9978949
8,000 TEU 2025
4.5
A
246 MSC DARLENE
IMO 9930959
15,500 TEU 2023
4.5
A
245 MSC SAMAR
IMO 9839442
22,000 TEU 2019
4.5
A
Page 5 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.