Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
CII band distribution
1,081 at D/E2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months
Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter
Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.
Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment
| Measure | Eligible | CO₂ reduction | Capex band | Payback | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger cut-out | 1,485 | 1–3% | €80k–250k | — | vendor claim |
| Propeller redesign / replacement | 1,440 | 5–10% | €400k–1,200k | — | vendor claim |
| Bulbous bow reprofiling | 1,344 | 2–6% | €300k–900k | — | vendor claim |
| Methanol dual-fuel conversion | 965 | 5–15% | €8,000k–20,000k | — | vendor claim |
| LNG dual-fuel conversion | 795 | 15–25% | €15,000k–35,000k | — | vendor claim |
| Shaft generator / PTO | 360 | 3–6% | €500–1,500/kW | — | vendor claim |
Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.
Retrofit opportunity in this segment
Retrofit prospects — worst band first
| Vessel | Band | Age | Drop year |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k | E | 16y | 2026 |
| SEPELU · <25k | E | 26y | 2026 |
| MSC SABRINA III · <25k | E | 37y | 2026 |
| NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k | E | 18y | 2026 |
| HAMBURG TRADER · <25k | E | 21y | 2026 |
Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.
| # | Vessel | Size (TEU) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 248 |
MSC MUGE
IMO 9978949
|
8,000 TEU | 2025 |
4.5
|
A |
| 247 |
MSC SAMAR
IMO 9839442
|
22,000 TEU | 2019 |
4.5
|
A |
| 252 |
SANTA CATARINA EXPRESS
IMO 9793911
|
11,800 TEU | 2018 |
4.5
|
A |
| 255 |
OOCL UNITED KINGDOM
IMO 9776200
|
21,100 TEU | 2015 |
4.5
|
A |
| 256 |
YM WARMTH
IMO 9704647
|
14,080 TEU | 2015 |
4.5
|
A |
| 254 |
MUNICH MAERSK
IMO 9778806
|
20,568 TEU | 2017 |
4.5
|
A |
| 257 |
SAN NICOLAS MAERSK
IMO 9622203
|
9,669 TEU | 2013 |
4.5
|
A |
| 259 |
ONE EAGLE
IMO 9741396
|
14,026 TEU | 2016 |
4.5
|
A |
| 258 |
ONE REINFORCEMENT
IMO 9952725
|
7,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.5
|
A |
| 260 |
HMM GARAM
IMO 9869186
|
14,000 TEU | 2021 |
4.5
|
A |
| 261 |
SEASPAN BRILLIANCE
IMO 9685334
|
10,100 TEU | 2014 |
4.5
|
A |
| 263 |
MSC MICOL
IMO 9931290
|
24,000 TEU | 2023 |
4.5
|
A |
| 262 |
MARSTAL MAERSK
IMO 9619971
|
18,270 TEU | 2014 |
4.5
|
A |
| 266 |
MAERSK HANOI
IMO 9784295
|
15,282 TEU | 2018 |
4.5
|
A |
| 265 |
MILAN MAERSK
IMO 9778820
|
20,568 TEU | 2017 |
4.5
|
A |
| 264 |
MADISON MAERSK
IMO 9619945
|
18,270 TEU | 2014 |
4.5
|
A |
| 268 |
MAERSK HERRERA
IMO 9784324
|
15,282 TEU | 2018 |
4.5
|
A |
| 267 |
COSCO SHIPPING GEMINI
IMO 9783526
|
17,273 TEU | 2018 |
4.5
|
A |
| 269 |
MSC GHANA
IMO 9974503
|
8,300 TEU | 2025 |
4.5
|
A |
| 271 |
CMA CGM MEXICO
IMO 9839911
|
15,128 TEU | 2019 |
4.6
|
A |
| 270 |
MAERSK EMDEN
IMO 9456769
|
13,100 TEU | 2010 |
4.6
|
A |
| 272 |
MSC LENI
IMO 9839454
|
22,000 TEU | 2019 |
4.6
|
A |
| 276 |
EVER ACT
IMO 9893905
|
23,764 TEU | 2021 |
4.6
|
A |
| 275 |
MSC ALLEGRA
IMO 9897028
|
23,656 TEU | 2021 |
4.6
|
A |
| 277 |
HYUNDAI PLUTO
IMO 9725160
|
10,000 TEU | 2016 |
4.6
|
A |
| 274 |
CMA CGM CEDRUS
IMO 9938121
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.6
|
A |
| 273 |
MSC NIGERIA
IMO 9974541
|
8,300 TEU | 2025 |
4.6
|
A |
| 279 |
MSC GEMMA
IMO 9936616
|
272,133 | 2023 |
4.6
|
A |
| 281 |
BRISBANE MAERSK
IMO 9984596
|
17,148 TEU | 2025 |
4.6
|
A |
| 278 |
CMA CGM GREENLAND
IMO 9895006
|
15,000 TEU | 2022 |
4.6
|
A |
| 280 |
MATZ MAERSK
IMO 9619983
|
18,270 TEU | 2011 |
4.6
|
A |
| 284 |
MSC TESSA
IMO 9930038
|
24,100 TEU | 2023 |
4.6
|
A |
| 283 |
MSC MIRJAM
IMO 9767376
|
16,909 TEU | 2016 |
4.6
|
A |
| 282 |
COSCO SHIPPING LEO
IMO 9783502
|
20,000 TEU | 2018 |
4.6
|
A |
| 285 |
MSC VIRGINIA
IMO 9908059
|
14,000 TEU | 2022 |
4.6
|
A |
| 286 |
MARY MAERSK
IMO 9619921
|
18,270 TEU | 2013 |
4.6
|
A |
| 289 |
MSC SAVONA
IMO 9460356
|
14,000 TEU | 2010 |
4.6
|
A |
| 288 |
ONE FOCUS
IMO 9944792
|
15,000 TEU | 2024 |
4.6
|
A |
| 287 |
MAERSK HOUSTON
IMO 9848950
|
15,286 TEU | 2019 |
4.6
|
A |
| 291 |
BANGKOK MAERSK
IMO 9984584
|
17,148 TEU | 2025 |
4.6
|
A |
| 290 |
MSC ROUEN
IMO 9975571
|
101,078 | 2025 |
4.6
|
A |
| 292 |
MOGENS MAERSK
IMO 9632090
|
18,270 TEU | 2014 |
4.6
|
A |
| 295 |
MSC WASHINGTON
IMO 9908047
|
14,428 TEU | 2022 |
4.6
|
A |
| 296 |
MSC LYON
IMO 9975569
|
101,078 | 2024 |
4.6
|
A |
| 294 |
COSCO SHIPPING LOTUS
IMO 9785811
|
13,500 TEU | 2019 |
4.6
|
A |
| 293 |
SAN ANTONIO MAERSK
IMO 9622241
|
9,669 TEU | 2014 |
4.6
|
A |
| 298 |
MAERSK CAMPBELL
IMO 9924209
|
15,500 TEU | 2022 |
4.7
|
A |
| 297 |
SEASPAN BRIGHTNESS
IMO 9685346
|
10,100 TEU | 2014 |
4.7
|
A |
| 299 |
CMA CGM IVANHOE
IMO 9365805
|
9,661 TEU | 2008 |
4.7
|
A |
| 300 |
COSCO SHIPPING LIBRA
IMO 9783538
|
17,273 TEU | 2018 |
4.7
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.