Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#151 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
-58% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,477 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
152 MSC CELESTINO MARESCA
IMO 9930040
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
154 MSC RAYA
IMO 9930052
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
151 MSC ANGOLA
IMO 9978729
14,000 TEU 2025
4.2
A
153 MSC AAYA
IMO 9927263
14,812 TEU 2022
4.2
A
156 MSC MONICA CRISTINA
IMO 9932050
15,264 TEU 2023
4.2
A
155 MSC ILENIA
IMO 9962548
202,562 2023
4.2
A
157 MSC ORSOLA
IMO 9946726
16,000 TEU 2024
4.2
A
158 CMA CGM SCANDOLA
IMO 9859129
15,128 TEU 2020
4.2
A
159 CMA CGM MAUI
IMO 9938157
15,000 TEU 2024
4.2
A
160 MSC MICHEL CAPPELLINI
IMO 9929431
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
162 CMA CGM SYMI
IMO 9867839
15,128 TEU 2022
4.2
A
161 MSC HORTENSE
IMO 9978951
11,400 TEU 2025
4.2
A
165 CMA CGM HELIUM
IMO 9996721
147,196 2025
4.2
A
164 MSC NICOLA MASTRO
IMO 9930064
24,100 TEU 2023
4.2
A
163 BANGKOK EXPRESS
IMO 9943889
23,660 TEU 2024
4.2
A
166 MAYVIEW MAERSK
IMO 9619995
18,270 TEU 2014
4.2
A
167 MSC IVA
IMO 9962550
202,562 2023
4.2
A
168 ONE FRONTIER
IMO 9934383
15,000 TEU 2023
4.2
A
169 YM TRANQUILITY
IMO 9792682
20,150 TEU 2022
4.2
A
172 MSC IVORY COAST
IMO 9974474
8,300 TEU 2025
4.2
A
171 BERLIN EXPRESS
IMO 9540118
23,660 TEU 2023
4.2
A
170 HMM GARNET
IMO 9944455
13,248 TEU 2024
4.2
A
174 YM WISDOM
IMO 9757216
13,870 TEU 2019
4.2
A
173 COSCO SHIPPING TAURUS
IMO 9783459
17,327 TEU 2018
4.2
A
175 ONE MACKINAC
IMO 9689603
13,900 TEU 2015
4.3
A
176 CMA CGM CHAMPS ELYSEES
IMO 9839131
23,500 TEU 2020
4.3
A
179 OOCL SPAIN
IMO 9908126
24,000 TEU 2023
4.3
A
178 YM WELLNESS
IMO 9704623
14,080 TEU 2015
4.3
A
177 MSC METTE
IMO 9936630
272,192 2023
4.3
A
181 CMA CGM TROCADERO
IMO 9839167
23,500 TEU 2021
4.3
A
180 MSC QUITTERIE
IMO 9946881
16,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
182 MARSEILLE MAERSK
IMO 9778844
20,568 TEU 2018
4.3
A
183 CMA CGM LOUVRE
IMO 9839143
23,500 TEU 2020
4.3
A
185 MSC ROSE
IMO 9957359
15,600 TEU 2024
4.3
A
184 COSCO SHIPPING VIRGO
IMO 9783461
17,327 TEU 2018
4.3
A
187 ONE TRADITION
IMO 9769300
20,170 TEU 2017
4.3
A
186 A. P. MOLLER
IMO 9948803
16,592 TEU 2021
4.3
A
188 MAERSK HALIFAX
IMO 9784271
15,282 TEU 2017
4.3
A
192 MARGRETHE MAERSK
IMO 9632131
18,340 TEU 2015
4.3
A
191 MADRID MAERSK
IMO 9778791
20,568 TEU 2017
4.3
A
190 MSC GIUSY
IMO 9947134
16,000 TEU 2023
4.3
A
189 MARCHEN MAERSK
IMO 9632143
18,340 TEU 2011
4.3
A
194 MARIE MAERSK
IMO 9619933
18,270 TEU 2013
4.3
A
197 MSC LINZIE
IMO 9987354
16,000 TEU 2025
4.3
A
196 MSC CRAPOLLA
IMO 9963621
15,600 TEU 2025
4.3
A
195 ONE FORTUNE
IMO 9944819
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
193 ONE FOREVER
IMO 9944807
15,000 TEU 2024
4.3
A
200 MSC ADELE
IMO 1016692
139,436 2025
4.3
A
199 COSCO SHIPPING UNIVERSE
IMO 9795610
21,000 TEU 2018
4.3
A
198 MSC TINA
IMO 9762340
15,909 TEU 2017
4.3
A
Page 4 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.