Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#803 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-25% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
801 MAERSK CAPRI
IMO 9786140
49,919 2018
3.9
C
802 ADVANTAGE SUMMER
IMO 9419890
156,527 2010
3.9
C
803 GREEN ADMIRE
IMO 9927196
114,377 2022
3.9
C
804 CIELO DI ROTTERDAM
IMO 9781279
74,999 2015
3.9
C
805 ANGELA GLORY
IMO 9952957
49,903 2023
3.9
C
806 GARRINCHA
IMO 9547702
115,727 2008
3.9
C
807 BELMAR
IMO 9516959
115,903 2008
3.9
C
808 ZOUZOU N.
IMO 9410222
149,991 2010
3.9
C
809 DAYTONA
IMO 9528043
115,896 2008
3.9
C
810 NORDSYMPHONY
IMO 9403475
106,246 2008
3.9
C
811 ADVANTAGE LIFE
IMO 9708564
109,999 2015
3.9
C
812 KRITI KING
IMO 9887255
158,005 2021
3.9
C
813 SAMOTHRAKI
IMO 1033808
113,532 2025
3.9
C
814 YINGHAO CONFIDENCE
IMO 9389978
107,600 2010
3.9
C
815 ADVANTAGE LOVE
IMO 9708552
109,999 2015
3.9
C
816 STI SUPREME
IMO 9719721
109,999 2015
3.9
C
817 HAFNIA EXCELLENCE
IMO 9735646
74,613 2016
3.9
C
818 TIGERLILY
IMO 9398280
107,525 2010
3.9
C
819 KRITI FUTURE
IMO 9924326
156,734 2020
4.0
C
820 ON PEACE
IMO 9893204
114,623 2021
4.0
C
821 SILVER EUPLECTA
IMO 9692349
49,635 2015
4.0
C
822 STI GRACE
IMO 9722584
109,999 2015
4.0
C
823 EURO
IMO 9567702
157,539 2009
4.0
C
824 ODESSA
IMO 9633458
162,090 2011
4.0
C
825 STI SOLACE
IMO 9708588
109,999 2013
4.0
C
826 CATALAN SEA
IMO 9577044
116,620 2012
4.0
C
827 SINBAD
IMO 9413688
115,928 2009
4.0
C
828 STI STEADFAST
IMO 9719719
109,999 2013
4.0
C
829 IASONAS
IMO 9419357
115,500 2006
4.0
C
830 SEARUBY
IMO 9759795
114,073 2017
4.0
C
831 FRONT SIRIUS
IMO 9767340
110,000 2014
4.0
C
832 FREEPORT STAR
IMO 9933212
115,518 2021
4.0
C
833 LUCKY TRADER
IMO 9952608
49,814 2021
4.0
C
834 PROTEUS HARVONNE
IMO 9923401
109,999 2022
4.0
C
835 LEVANTINE SEA
IMO 9815616
114,218 2016
4.0
C
836 SEA TIGER I
IMO 9358955
49,999 2007
4.0
C
837 LIWA-V
IMO 9489039
105,221 2011
4.0
C
838 GIANNIS
IMO 9432050
149,999 2011
4.0
C
839 PERSEUS STAR
IMO 9891684
116,026 2021
4.0
C
840 MARAN THULE
IMO 9895264
147,098 2022
4.0
C
841 MINERVA SYMPHONY
IMO 9304605
159,450 2003
4.0
C
842 WISDOM VENTURE
IMO 9773741
112,186 2017
4.0
C
843 STI SOLIDARITY
IMO 9708576
109,999 2013
4.0
C
844 HAI SHANG
IMO 9792852
109,900 2018
4.0
C
845 AFRAPEARL II
IMO 9437672
115,897 2010
4.0
C
846 ORANGE STARS
IMO 9433597
115,756 2011
4.0
C
847 MINERVA MARINA
IMO 9411939
157,954 2009
4.0
C
848 BNEIDER
IMO 9595010
110,587 2012
4.0
C
849 T.KURUCESME
IMO 9692478
105,171 2013
4.0
C
850 TILOS I
IMO 9800271
149,999 2018
4.0
C
Page 17 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.