Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#753 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-34% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 ONE HANGZHOU BAY
IMO 9566394
8,974 TEU 2012
6.5
B
752 MAERSK LAGUNA
IMO 9526942
7,450 TEU 2012
6.5
B
753 MSC ELEONORA III
IMO 9064750
2,480 TEU 1994
6.5
B
756 CMA CGM KHAO SOK
IMO 9925837
5,900 TEU 2023
6.5
B
755 MSC CANDICE
IMO 9339284
9,178 TEU 2007
6.5
B
754 NYK VEGA
IMO 9312781
9,012 TEU 2006
6.5
B
757 MSC MELINE
IMO 9702077
8,819 TEU 2015
6.5
B
759 CALLAO EXPRESS
IMO 9777606
10,589 TEU 2016
6.6
B
758 XIAMEN EXPRESS
IMO 9630420
10,000 TEU 2015
6.6
B
761 CMA CGM FORT JAMES
IMO 9966764
7,600 TEU 2024
6.6
B
760 W KAMPALA
IMO 9215311
6,802 TEU 2001
6.6
B
762 ONE HELSINKI
IMO 9588081
8,930 TEU 2012
6.6
B
763 MSC YASHI B
IMO 9778090
11,010 TEU 2018
6.6
B
764 MSC JUDITH
IMO 9299549
8,089 TEU 2006
6.6
B
767 HYUNDAI FORCE
IMO 9347566
8,566 TEU 2008
6.6
B
766 MSC NITYA B
IMO 9778117
11,010 TEU 2017
6.6
B
765 MSC TEXAS
IMO 9318058
8,465 TEU 2006
6.6
B
769 CMA CGM CENDRILLON
IMO 9449819
8,500 TEU 2009
6.6
B
768 GUAYAQUIL EXPRESS
IMO 9777620
10,589 TEU 2017
6.6
B
770 MAERSK LABREA
IMO 9527063
8,700 TEU 2008
6.6
B
772 MSC TEMA VIII
IMO 9983669
8,182 TEU 2022
6.6
B
771 COSCO PORTUGAL
IMO 9516466
13,386 TEU 2008
6.6
B
773 MAERSK SALALAH
IMO 9352016
8,400 TEU 2008
6.6
B
774 ZIM MOONSTONE
IMO 9968073
7,000 TEU 2024
6.6
B
776 MAERSK LA PAZ
IMO 9526899
7,450 TEU 2011
6.6
B
775 HUBERT SCHULTE
IMO 9535204
5,605 TEU 2012
6.6
B
777 MSC FLORENTINA
IMO 9251705
6,732 TEU 2003
6.7
B
779 ONE HUMEN
IMO 9302164
8,212 TEU 2007
6.7
B
778 MAERSK LINS
IMO 9527025
8,700 TEU 2008
6.7
B
781 MSC EVEREST VIII
IMO 9286231
8,238 TEU 2004
6.7
B
780 MSC ELMA
IMO 9735218
9,408 TEU 2016
6.7
B
782 MAERSK MEMPHIS
IMO 9348651
6,188 TEU 2007
6.7
B
783 ANTHEA Y
IMO 9710244
9,115 TEU 2015
6.7
B
785 MSC TORONTO
IMO 9299525
8,089 TEU 2006
6.7
B
784 GUDRUN MAERSK
IMO 9302877
7,668 TEU 2003
6.7
B
787 SPEED
IMO 9475698
13,100 TEU 2012
6.7
B
786 OOCL SEOUL
IMO 9417244
8,063 TEU 2006
6.7
B
791 ONE HOUSTON
IMO 9566382
8,930 TEU 2012
6.7
B
790 ONE HONG KONG
IMO 9395161
8,212 TEU 2009
6.7
B
792 NYK VENUS
IMO 9312793
9,012 TEU 2007
6.7
B
789 COSCO DENMARK
IMO 9516478
13,360 TEU 2008
6.7
B
793 MSC SOFIA CELESTE
IMO 9702091
8,819 TEU 2015
6.7
B
788 APL SAVANNAH
IMO 9597513
9,200 TEU 2010
6.7
B
794 EVER FOREVER
IMO 9850575
12,000 TEU 2018
6.7
B
796 JASPER
IMO 9968061
7,000 TEU 2024
6.7
B
797 NYK DEMETER
IMO 9337664
4,888 TEU 2007
6.7
B
795 ONE READINESS
IMO 9952684
7,000 TEU 2023
6.7
B
800 NYK RUMINA
IMO 9416991
4,888 TEU 2010
6.7
B
799 MAERSK SAVANNAH
IMO 9352028
8,400 TEU 2008
6.7
B
798 POTOMAC EXPRESS
IMO 9349526
6,435 TEU 2008
6.7
B
Page 16 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.