Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,424 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-14% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 627 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

120
Q4
135
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
135
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,927 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,877 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,836 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,636 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,636 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,021 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,138
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,997–11,925M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,138 of 1,138 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1399 SAMOA
IMO 9473157
75,505 2010
4.2
B
1407 BIRDIE
IMO 9726243
60,269 2015
4.2
B
1406 GOLDEN OPAL
IMO 9470404
74,232 2017
4.2
B
1405 ASTREA
IMO 9705366
81,838 2015
4.2
B
1404 PALM ISLAND
IMO 9624641
61,470 2012
4.2
B
1403 MALYOVITSA
IMO 9835795
45,516 2020
4.2
B
1402 CAPE PROVIDENCE
IMO 9494228
179,643 2009
4.2
B
1410 SILVER LADY
IMO 9279367
50,329 2003
4.2
B
1409 HARMONY
IMO 9449522
32,453 2010
4.2
B
1411 GENIUS SW
IMO 9511052
60,200 2015
4.2
B
1408 KARPATHOS DAWN
IMO 9427342
56,700 2010
4.2
B
1413 DESERT GRACE
IMO 9849502
63,553 2015
4.2
B
1412 SINOKOR SUNRISE
IMO 9602148
77,730 2011
4.2
B
1423 MYKONOS
IMO 9633410
81,386 2013
4.2
B
1422 HAPPINESS BULKER
IMO 9919515
37,694 2023
4.2
B
1421 AEOLIAN ARROW
IMO 9671814
82,053 2018
4.2
B
1420 ULTRA VISION
IMO 9878694
61,119 2020
4.2
B
1419 NEW ACACIA
IMO 1014591
39,415 2022
4.2
B
1418 ETG SOUTHERN CROSS
IMO 9888015
63,482 2021
4.2
B
1417 ABILITY
IMO 9908281
64,253 2021
4.2
B
1416 JADE PROSPERITY
IMO 9656096
63,756 2014
4.2
B
1415 G TAISHAN
IMO 9440992
58,780 2008
4.2
B
1414 NEW ENDEAVOR
IMO 9579638
80,536 2011
4.2
B
1424 UNITY DISCOVERY
IMO 9726047
60,629 2017
4.2
C
1426 ALLIANCE
IMO 9552824
83,369 2010
4.2
C
1429 JOSCO DEZHOU
IMO 9683439
61,657 2014
4.2
C
1428 GOLDEN AMBER
IMO 9458987
74,753 2017
4.2
C
1427 NEARCHOS
IMO 9852030
61,148 2019
4.2
C
1425 ASPASIA LUCK
IMO 9223485
72,270 2000
4.2
C
1430 CL TOMO
IMO 9908279
64,273 2021
4.2
C
1431 DESERT RANGER
IMO 9699854
61,146 2017
4.2
C
1435 NKR ALICE
IMO 9914515
61,217 2022
4.2
C
1434 ALANOOD
IMO 9837121
80,681 2020
4.2
C
1433 GRIZZLY
IMO 9659232
81,394 2013
4.2
C
1432 KIRA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9867566
81,290 2020
4.2
C
1438 ANDROS SPIRIT
IMO 9592537
82,740 2012
4.2
C
1437 PROPEL GRACE
IMO 9605023
61,439 2012
4.2
C
1436 PRT ACE
IMO 9713466
61,290 2014
4.2
C
1442 BULK INDEPENDENCE
IMO 9374002
56,548 2008
4.2
C
1441 AGIA FOTINI
IMO 9544164
38,140 2012
4.2
C
1443 SARIKA NAREE
IMO 9726425
63,023 2015
4.2
C
1440 SYLVIA
IMO 9471264
80,282 2010
4.2
C
1439 GNG CONCORD 1
IMO 9629653
75,397 2010
4.2
C
1450 WESTERN TOKYO
IMO 9838498
62,647 2019
4.2
C
1449 CASTILLO DE NAVIA
IMO 9722974
119,612 2015
4.2
C
1448 SHEILA
IMO 9730244
58,608 2013
4.2
C
1447 EFFIE
IMO 9591806
81,911 2012
4.2
C
1446 ETERNITY SW
IMO 9425851
58,098 2011
4.2
C
1445 INTERLINK PRIORITY
IMO 9725902
43,477 2017
4.2
C
1444 GOLDEN PEARL
IMO 9470375
74,300 2013
4.2
C
Page 29 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.