Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#238 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-41% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 448C 447D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 224 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
34
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,297 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,286 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,133 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,133 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 930 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 700 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

284
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€694–1,710M
capex range, top measure per vessel (284 of 284 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
201 STI MARSHALL
IMO 9833565
49,999 2019
5.7
A
202 MARITIME VALOR
IMO 9848352
49,998 2021
5.7
A
203 FPMC 34
IMO 9845166
49,781 2019
5.7
A
204 SOLAR SALLY
IMO 9898498
49,314 2021
5.7
A
205 NAVIG8 GRACE
IMO 9833656
49,804 2019
5.7
A
208 BEAGLE
IMO 9814181
49,850 2019
5.7
A
206 ARDMORE SEAVANTAGE
IMO 9637076
47,790 2014
5.7
A
207 STENA IMPRIMIS
IMO 9797395
49,718 2017
5.7
A
209 STENA IMMACULATE
IMO 9693018
49,729 2017
5.7
A
212 SOLAR CHERYL
IMO 9898503
49,390 2021
5.7
A
211 ELANDRA BALTIC
IMO 9482562
51,406 2011
5.7
A
210 TORM DAPHNE
IMO 9692313
49,746 2015
5.7
A
213 ALPINE EAGLE
IMO 9366275
51,542 2008
5.7
A
214 BRITISH SAILOR
IMO 9724673
45,999 2016
5.7
A
215 TORM DAGNY
IMO 9692337
49,635 2015
5.7
A
216 SANTIAGO I
IMO 9730347
49,901 2022
5.7
A
217 ARDMORE ENDURANCE
IMO 9654567
49,365 2013
5.7
A
218 MIDNIGHT GLORY
IMO 9877808
50,322 2020
5.8
A
222 CL EMILY BRONTE
IMO 9943322
49,348 2023
5.8
A
221 MIA GRACE
IMO 9681132
49,990 2014
5.8
A
220 HIGH DISCOVERY
IMO 9674725
45,999 2014
5.8
A
219 CLEAROCEAN MARVEL
IMO 9849291
49,995 2019
5.8
A
225 NORD OCEANIA
IMO 9747120
49,996 2015
5.8
A
224 CL AGATHA CHRISTIE
IMO 9943346
49,327 2023
5.8
A
226 YASA ORION
IMO 9888340
50,215 2021
5.8
A
223 YASA FLAMINGO
IMO 9857236
50,215 2019
5.8
A
228 SALACGRIVA
IMO 9323390
52,620 2008
5.8
A
227 THERESA LIMA
IMO 9946130
49,449 2023
5.8
A
229 HAFNIA KIRSTEN
IMO 9732682
49,999 2017
5.8
A
230 MARLIN AZURITE
IMO 9721920
49,999 2016
5.8
A
231 CHEMROAD ORCHID
IMO 9790608
35,703 2019
5.8
A
233 MARLIN AMETRINE
IMO 9697234
49,999 2015
5.8
A
232 MAGIC CHEMIST
IMO 9707261
49,990 2015
5.8
A
235 COSMIC GLORY
IMO 9877822
50,322 2020
5.8
A
234 ST GEORGE
IMO 9412775
50,651 2010
5.8
A
236 SEA ELEPHANT
IMO 9853254
49,929 2018
5.8
A
237 CLEAROCEAN MILANO
IMO 9917658
50,485 2021
5.8
A
239 QUARTZ
IMO 9681170
49,990 2015
5.8
A
241 DORADO
IMO 9801574
50,067 2021
5.8
A
238 VIRGO
IMO 9417218
50,997 2010
5.8
A
242 HAKATA PRINCESS
IMO 9788564
49,842 2018
5.8
A
240 MARLIN AMMOLITE
IMO 9697246
49,999 2016
5.8
A
243 FPMC 35
IMO 9845178
49,681 2020
5.9
A
244 HAFNIA AQUAMARINE
IMO 9711573
38,506 2015
5.9
A
246 NAVIG8 GAUNTLET
IMO 9853228
49,768 2019
5.9
A
245 PETITE SOEUR
IMO 9448712
50,420 2011
5.9
A
247 T JUNGFRAU
IMO 9389289
52,610 2009
5.9
A
248 HIGH VOYAGER
IMO 9681845
45,999 2014
5.9
A
250 SEA FRACTUS
IMO 9724609
45,999 2016
5.9
A
249 JOSE PROGRESS
IMO 9392391
47,018 2009
5.9
A
Page 5 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.