Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#586 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-30% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,300 at D/E
A 1,145B 955C 1,317D 765E 535

4,717 rated vessels · 529 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

93
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
75
'27 Q2
57
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
88
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,934 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,818 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 2,818 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,101
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,980–11,883M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,101 of 1,101 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
559 ARETI.GR
IMO 9789893
60,243 2017
3.4
A
558 RIPLEY PROSPERITY
IMO 9464417
76,565 2008
3.4
A
557 AQUAVITA TRUST
IMO 9826445
62,625 2019
3.4
A
556 ULTRA OCELOT
IMO 9871191
81,901 2020
3.4
A
555 AFRICAN DRAGON
IMO 9990416
66,647 2024
3.4
A
554 PRISCILLA
IMO 9880221
82,543 2020
3.4
A
553 PEAK MATTERHORN
IMO 9731822
81,060 2016
3.4
A
552 AMO
IMO 9296626
82,214 2006
3.4
A
551 SPAR CASTOR
IMO 9719666
63,270 2018
3.4
A
562 AQUAGEM
IMO 9950909
82,292 2023
3.4
A
561 GOLDEN ERLING
IMO 9955571
85,000 2024
3.4
A
563 CRIMSON KINGDOM
IMO 9748033
84,860 2016
3.4
A
560 DREAM STAR
IMO 9582996
81,909 2014
3.4
A
568 SKOMER ISLAND
IMO 9573854
61,510 2010
3.4
A
565 KONSTANTINOS D
IMO 9972608
63,516 2024
3.4
A
564 OSHIMA JAPAN
IMO 9872975
62,661 2021
3.4
A
567 NEW ASCENT
IMO 9512290
82,179 2012
3.4
A
566 NAVIOS GALILEO
IMO 9326536
76,596 2006
3.4
A
576 RICHARD OLDENDORFF
IMO 9462366
121,354 2011
3.4
A
571 AMALIA
IMO 9770634
81,783 2019
3.4
A
577 AL KARAMA
IMO 9801732
63,878 2019
3.4
A
570 ELATI
IMO 9836490
81,746 2019
3.4
A
569 MAROUDIO
IMO 9815965
64,723 2022
3.4
A
575 NORD ANTARES
IMO 9933224
82,258 2022
3.4
A
574 MAGMA INTEGRITY
IMO 9967677
63,697 2022
3.4
A
573 CALYPSO V
IMO 9381213
76,596 2007
3.4
A
572 ARIES KARIN
IMO 9894478
64,229 2021
3.4
A
581 KAMILLA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9952452
82,245 2024
3.4
A
580 ROYAL HOPE
IMO 9726762
81,011 2015
3.4
A
582 SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
81,938 2013
3.4
A
579 TRANSCENDEN STAR
IMO 9928231
84,952 2022
3.4
A
585 MEGHNA PIONEER
IMO 9894466
64,276 2020
3.4
A
584 JIMMY T
IMO 9782118
81,704 2017
3.4
A
583 YASA VENUS
IMO 9848118
61,075 2019
3.4
A
578 CL GENEVA
IMO 9911587
85,229 2021
3.4
A
588 BELMAR
IMO 9908475
63,641 2021
3.4
A
590 TIANA
IMO 9317470
77,283 2008
3.4
A
587 MAGSENGER 10
IMO 9497268
115,301 2012
3.4
A
593 KEY FUTURE
IMO 9512329
82,099 2012
3.4
A
592 AXIOS
IMO 9706542
81,960 2017
3.4
A
586 INCE ANADOLU
IMO 9527271
76,619 2009
3.4
A
589 OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
82,024 2019
3.4
A
591 MAMMA MIA
IMO 9846548
60,446 2015
3.4
A
600 BESIKTAS KAZAKHSTAN
IMO 9461271
169,263 2010
3.4
A
599 SHARQI
IMO 9964845
66,316 2023
3.4
A
598 RB JAKE
IMO 9765706
81,039 2016
3.4
A
597 SAKIZAYA CHAMPION
IMO 9680360
78,080 2014
3.4
A
596 SHANDONG FU REN
IMO 9748784
81,783 2018
3.4
A
595 GREEN K-MAX 6
IMO 9862621
80,890 2020
3.4
A
594 MYRTO
IMO 9518086
82,131 2013
3.4
A
Page 12 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.