Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#109 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-57% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
100 NAVE ALLEGRO
IMO 9876414
313,433 2020
2.2
A
102 PROTEUS INGRID
IMO 9923463
119,900 2020
2.2
A
103 NISSOS HERACLEA
IMO 9419618
313,875 2009
2.2
A
104 MAXIM
IMO 9604079
296,887 2011
2.2
A
105 ADVANTAGE SMOOTH
IMO 9999620
174,728 2023
2.2
A
108 EAGLE VALLERY
IMO 9910246
299,473 2022
2.2
A
107 MARAN ARIADNE
IMO 9770517
319,398 2016
2.2
A
106 IONIC SEMELI
IMO 1037933
159,120 2025
2.2
A
109 DHT EUROPE
IMO 9315159
317,713 2007
2.2
A
110 NORTH LOYALTY
IMO 9537771
314,000 2012
2.2
A
111 NEW ENERGY
IMO 9708526
318,866 2016
2.3
A
112 ITHAKI
IMO 9526461
299,940 2011
2.3
A
113 NEW MELODY
IMO 9799185
307,431 2019
2.3
A
114 SONANGOL NJINGA MBANDE
IMO 9938494
157,663 2023
2.3
A
115 NEW PEARL
IMO 9468322
301,525 2011
2.3
A
117 IONIAN SAILOR
IMO 9296389
149,997 2006
2.3
A
116 TRINITY
IMO 9730361
158,734 2014
2.3
A
118 IMOLA
IMO 1014876
156,906 2025
2.3
A
120 SONANGOL MAIOMBE
IMO 9766322
156,935 2017
2.3
A
119 NORDIC TELLUS
IMO 9818230
157,407 2018
2.3
A
122 AZURE NOVA
IMO 9602631
319,743 2012
2.3
A
121 LAUSANNE STAR
IMO 1028530
158,100 2025
2.3
A
123 DELTA COMMANDER
IMO 9418157
157,477 2010
2.3
A
126 EAGLE SAN FRANCISCO
IMO 9795127
157,512 2018
2.3
A
125 HARMONIC
IMO 9819868
159,204 2015
2.3
A
124 DELTA MARIA
IMO 9700691
157,031 2015
2.3
A
127 BOLD WARRIOR
IMO 1058092
156,885 2025
2.4
A
128 MONTESPERANZA
IMO 9585871
159,179 2012
2.4
A
129 SEAWAYS MONTAUK
IMO 9779537
158,432 2017
2.4
A
130 MARLIN SOMERSET
IMO 9835850
156,620 2017
2.4
A
132 SEA AMETHYST
IMO 9920693
157,146 2020
2.4
A
131 UNION PEACE
IMO 9339973
311,141 2007
2.4
A
134 C. INNOVATOR
IMO 9595618
313,999 2012
2.4
A
133 ADVANTAGE SMART
IMO 1028683
159,097 2025
2.4
A
138 CEDAR
IMO 9907433
158,289 2022
2.4
A
140 AESOP
IMO 1030399
158,954 2025
2.4
A
137 BRUGGE
IMO 9941855
157,138 2023
2.4
A
136 VL PRIME
IMO 9683685
319,547 2015
2.4
A
135 SEATRIUMPH
IMO 9783722
299,700 2015
2.4
A
139 EAGLE SAN JOSE
IMO 9795139
157,512 2018
2.4
A
142 YASA SOUTHERN CROSS
IMO 9534030
318,438 2006
2.4
A
141 TWIN POLLUX
IMO 9625968
320,475 2014
2.4
A
144 DIMITRIOS
IMO 9900007
159,159 2021
2.4
A
145 SATURN MOON
IMO 9814430
158,000 2015
2.4
A
143 GULF SUNRISE
IMO 9788887
301,528 2017
2.4
A
146 PATRIOTIC
IMO 9819832
159,090 2015
2.4
A
147 PASCHALIS DD
IMO 9765378
159,812 2018
2.4
A
150 FRONT CLASSIC
IMO 9759769
157,434 2017
2.5
A
149 KIMOLOS
IMO 9791145
159,159 2018
2.5
A
148 MARAN THETIS
IMO 9421427
320,105 2012
2.5
A
Page 3 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.