Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,377 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
19.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+105% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 SCANDIC
IMO 9386249
11,505 2007
18.3
E
1352 NQ ZINNIA
IMO 9150327
10,128 1998
18.4
E
1353 KONGO STAR
IMO 9508823
13,011 2010
18.4
E
1354 MANAS
IMO 9447055
10,744 2008
18.5
E
1355 ANTON
IMO 9514456
8,403 2010
18.5
E
1356 CAROLINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9439151
8,792 2009
18.6
E
1357 IVER AMBITION
IMO 9439163
9,228 2009
18.6
E
1358 WILHELMINE ESSBERGER
IMO 9295440
8,631 2005
18.6
E
1359 SCOT FRANKFURT
IMO 9274537
8,182 2005
18.6
E
1360 COSIMA PG
IMO 9857822
7,392 2019
18.6
E
1361 OWL 4
IMO 9435557
13,075 2006
18.7
E
1362 ELARA
IMO 9309148
11,276 2006
18.9
E
1363 SCOT DRESDEN
IMO 9365245
8,158 2007
18.9
E
1364 VIVA
IMO 9156539
16,116 1999
18.9
E
1365 DENSA DERYA
IMO 9367358
8,011 2008
18.9
E
1366 TRANS EMERALD
IMO 9295452
8,650 2005
19.0
E
1367 LAMENTIN
IMO 9377054
11,320 2007
19.0
E
1368 MURRAY STAR
IMO 9527635
13,006 2011
19.0
E
1369 KARRUCA
IMO 9216470
7,721 2001
19.1
E
1370 GTM DENMARK
IMO 9528902
11,596 2011
19.1
E
1371 OLYMPUS
IMO 9310355
9,189 2006
19.1
E
1372 HELGA ESSBERGER
IMO 9172155
9,887 1999
19.1
E
1373 DH BLOSSOMING
IMO 9813046
8,702 2015
19.2
E
1374 ANNETTE ESSBERGER
IMO 9327059
11,340 2006
19.2
E
1375 AMUR STAR
IMO 9480368
13,019 2010
19.2
E
1376 ARABELLA
IMO 9909247
7,703 2021
19.3
E
1377 ERICUSA M
IMO 9367372
18,000 2009
19.3
E
1378 AGNES ESSBERGER
IMO 9327047
11,340 2006
19.3
E
1379 HABIP BAYRAK
IMO 9458183
8,405 2010
19.5
E
1380 SIGRID THERESA
IMO 9392183
8,139 2008
19.6
E
1381 LIA IEVOLI
IMO 9148582
9,976 1999
19.6
E
1382 BASAT
IMO 9447029
10,745 2008
19.6
E
1383 ENDO OSTRO
IMO 9393656
7,335 2008
19.6
E
1384 SPRING S
IMO 9416812
13,022 2006
19.6
E
1385 NQ LILIUM
IMO 9393395
8,110 2009
19.7
E
1386 EFE
IMO 9558763
7,623 2010
19.7
E
1387 NORDSTRAUM
IMO 9523548
9,616 2012
19.8
E
1388 IEVOLI SHINE
IMO 9172167
9,887 1998
19.8
E
1389 CARIBE MARIA
IMO 9337286
11,299 2007
19.9
E
1390 KATELINA
IMO 9485368
8,933 2014
20.3
E
1391 GISELA ESSBERGER
IMO 9147734
9,554 1998
20.3
E
1392 GIOIA MIA
IMO 9321419
8,057 2006
20.4
E
1393 HACI FATMA ANA
IMO 9458195
8,424 2011
20.4
E
1394 MED PAKIZE
IMO 9830604
8,219 2020
20.4
E
1395 STOC NIKE
IMO 9431032
7,770 2009
20.4
E
1396 GIOCONDA
IMO 9819052
7,746 2018
20.4
E
1397 FIYUH
IMO 9499371
26,215 2011
20.4
E
1398 DUZGIT ENDEAVOUR
IMO 9581007
15,995 2013
20.5
E
1399 NQ LAELIA
IMO 9393383
8,115 2008
20.5
E
1400 MED SERHAT
IMO 9461922
8,263 2020
20.5
E
Page 28 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.