Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,147 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-2% greener
D

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1101 CASPIAN SEA
IMO 9829095
114,218 2017
4.8
D
1102 OHIO
IMO 9417440
105,188 2009
4.8
D
1103 SEASTAR
IMO 9373656
116,049 2005
4.8
D
1104 ATROTOS
IMO 9953432
50,113 2023
4.8
D
1105 CABO FUJI
IMO 9730878
74,246 2017
4.8
D
1106 STI DONALD C TRAUSCHT
IMO 9794422
51,260 2015
4.8
D
1107 OLYMPIC SEA
IMO 9489285
104,808 2008
4.8
D
1108 AL ADAILIAH
IMO 9856684
48,578 2020
4.8
D
1109 CURRENT SPIRIT
IMO 9843924
129,801 2020
4.8
D
1110 STI MERAUX
IMO 9681118
50,300 2012
4.8
D
1111 MARALTA
IMO 9324320
74,999 2007
4.8
D
1112 HAFNIA OSPREY
IMO 9682241
49,999 2015
4.8
D
1113 FLAGSHIP SAGE
IMO 9471329
74,158 2007
4.8
D
1114 ALIAI
IMO 9884813
50,315 2021
4.8
D
1115 TORM SUCCESS
IMO 9836048
49,976 2019
4.8
D
1116 KRITI LEGEND
IMO 9398266
107,518 2009
4.8
D
1117 JAG PRERANA
IMO 9321952
47,824 2007
4.9
D
1118 HELLESPONT PROMISE
IMO 9351438
73,669 2004
4.9
D
1119 PROPONTIS
IMO 9305623
117,055 2006
4.9
D
1120 ENERGY ARTEMIS
IMO 9928750
49,812 2022
4.9
D
1121 LONE STAR MARINER
IMO 9902859
50,177 2021
4.9
D
1122 SIFSAFAH
IMO 9856713
48,578 2020
4.9
D
1123 IRINI
IMO 9934890
49,990 2022
4.9
D
1124 MARI JONE
IMO 9725316
49,999 2016
4.9
D
1125 VOULA
IMO 9488413
73,774 2006
4.9
D
1126 LARGO EXCELLENCE
IMO 9935923
49,999 2023
4.9
D
1127 HAFNIA THALASSA
IMO 9800324
109,990 2019
4.9
D
1128 MAERSK CRETE
IMO 9786190
49,919 2019
4.9
D
1129 BULL
IMO 9292503
115,514 2005
4.9
D
1130 SHAHRAZAD
IMO 9389863
74,999 2009
4.9
D
1131 AKTEA
IMO 9326512
51,371 2008
4.9
D
1132 HAFNIA LIONESS
IMO 9675509
49,999 2014
4.9
D
1133 NORD VULCAN
IMO 9982524
49,999 2024
5.0
D
1134 RICH HARVEST
IMO 9908982
50,446 2021
5.0
D
1135 VALFOGLIA
IMO 9417309
109,060 2009
5.0
D
1136 WECO PISCES
IMO 9923932
49,999 2022
5.0
D
1137 EVRIDIKI
IMO 9358929
73,740 2008
5.0
D
1138 SILVER MUNA
IMO 9718856
50,000 2013
5.0
D
1139 PACIFIC MOONSTONE
IMO 9892078
50,192 2021
5.0
D
1140 P. ALIKI
IMO 9460136
105,304 2010
5.0
D
1141 ADVANTAGE ATOM
IMO 9472622
116,014 2011
5.0
D
1142 SEMERU
IMO 9388376
105,777 2008
5.0
D
1143 ALATAU
IMO 9416551
115,896 2009
5.0
D
1144 CLEAROCEAN MAVERICK
IMO 9900825
49,999 2019
5.0
D
1145 SAVIR TIGER
IMO 9388730
108,941 2008
5.0
D
1146 MONTEGO
IMO 9297553
108,402 2006
5.0
D
1147 CL VIRGINIA WOOLF
IMO 9943396
49,359 2024
5.0
D
1148 ADVANTAGE PORTO CERVO
IMO 9794850
75,144 2019
5.0
D
1149 STAVANGER PRIDE
IMO 9856062
49,999 2020
5.0
D
1150 EUROPE I
IMO 9905332
163,136 2022
5.0
D
Page 23 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.