Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#334 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
4.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-52% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
301 MSC VENICE
IMO 9647473
16,000 TEU 2016
4.7
A
302 MUMBAI MAERSK
IMO 9780471
19,630 TEU 2015
4.7
A
305 MSC DARIA
IMO 9927287
14,812 TEU 2023
4.7
A
304 YM WORTH
IMO 9704635
14,080 TEU 2015
4.7
A
303 ONE RELIABILITY
IMO 9952737
7,000 TEU 2024
4.7
A
306 APL MERLION
IMO 9632014
17,292 TEU 2014
4.7
A
307 HMM RAON
IMO 9869215
14,000 TEU 2021
4.7
A
308 ONE FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9934369
15,000 TEU 2023
4.7
A
310 ZENITH LUMOS
IMO 9864215
15,000 TEU 2020
4.7
A
309 SALAHUDDIN
IMO 9708796
14,993 TEU 2015
4.7
A
316 MSC LE HAVRE
IMO 9975583
101,078 2025
4.7
A
315 HMM DREAM
IMO 9637222
13,154 TEU 2014
4.7
A
314 MSC INSA
IMO 1016666
139,641 2025
4.7
A
313 COSCO SHIPPING CAPRICORN
IMO 9783514
19,150 TEU 2018
4.7
A
312 HYUNDAI SATURN
IMO 9725146
10,055 TEU 2016
4.7
A
311 CMA CGM INNOVATION
IMO 9951525
7,600 TEU 2023
4.7
A
317 COSCO SHIPPING LIBRA
IMO 9783538
20,038 TEU 2018
4.7
A
319 METTE MAERSK
IMO 9632155
18,000 TEU 2011
4.7
A
318 MSC MICHELLE
IMO 9897016
23,656 TEU 2021
4.7
A
323 EVER ALLY
IMO 9975791
24,004 TEU 2022
4.7
A
322 MERETE MAERSK
IMO 9632064
18,270 TEU 2011
4.7
A
324 AL MURABBA
IMO 9708837
15,000 TEU 2015
4.7
A
321 YM TUTORIAL
IMO 9792618
11,714 TEU 2015
4.7
A
320 MSC CAMEROON
IMO 9974498
8,300 TEU 2025
4.7
A
325 SEASPAN BELLWETHER
IMO 9713363
10,100 TEU 2015
4.7
A
327 MSC IRENE
IMO 9399040
13,798 TEU 2010
4.7
A
328 CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT
IMO 9776432
20,954 TEU 2018
4.7
A
326 CMA CGM HERMES
IMO 9882499
15,000 TEU 2021
4.7
A
330 MSC BENIN
IMO 9974565
8,100 TEU 2025
4.7
A
329 MAERSK HAMBURG
IMO 9784312
15,226 TEU 2015
4.7
A
333 OOCL HONG KONG
IMO 9776171
21,413 TEU 2015
4.7
A
332 YM WONDROUS
IMO 9684677
14,080 TEU 2015
4.7
A
331 CMA CGM KIMBERLEY
IMO 9894973
15,000 TEU 2021
4.7
A
336 MARIBO MAERSK
IMO 9619969
18,270 TEU 2011
4.8
A
335 COSCO SHIPPING SAGITTARIUS
IMO 9783473
20,038 TEU 2018
4.8
A
337 ONE MUNCHEN
IMO 9706750
13,870 TEU 2015
4.8
A
334 YM WHOLESOME
IMO 9704611
14,080 TEU 2015
4.8
A
339 EVER ACME
IMO 9943267
24,000 TEU 2022
4.8
A
338 MSC IVANA
IMO 9398371
11,668 TEU 2008
4.8
A
340 APL MIAMI
IMO 9597549
9,200 TEU 2010
4.8
A
341 YM TRAVEL
IMO 9878503
11,714 TEU 2015
4.8
A
342 MSC TAYLOR
IMO 9932048
15,264 TEU 2023
4.8
A
343 EVER ARIA
IMO 9909132
24,004 TEU 2019
4.8
A
347 CMA CGM CAPE COD
IMO 9938133
15,000 TEU 2024
4.8
A
346 SAN RAPHAEL MAERSK
IMO 9622253
9,669 TEU 2014
4.8
A
345 ONE RECOMMENDATION
IMO 9952713
7,000 TEU 2024
4.8
A
344 OOCL SCANDINAVIA
IMO 9776212
21,413 TEU 2015
4.8
A
350 AL JMELIYAH
IMO 9732357
14,993 TEU 2017
4.8
A
349 YM WITNESS
IMO 9704609
14,080 TEU 2015
4.8
A
348 MAERSK CANYON
IMO 9924235
15,500 TEU 2020
4.8
A
Page 7 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.