Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#85 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-49% greener
A

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 960 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 872 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 872 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
52 TORM DANICA
IMO 9702194
50,000 2015
4.5
A
51 CREOLE SUN
IMO 9850214
49,760 2019
4.5
A
53 MONA
IMO 9917880
55,202 2022
4.5
A
54 DINO
IMO 9995454
50,479 2025
4.5
A
55 ST. PETRI
IMO 9788497
50,105 2019
4.5
A
56 KK MARLIN
IMO 9835939
77,452 2021
4.6
A
58 MARIA
IMO 9917828
55,202 2022
4.6
A
60 JEFFREYS BAY
IMO 1013937
49,999 2025
4.6
A
57 TORM BELIS
IMO 9661247
49,995 2012
4.6
A
59 STENA PROMISE
IMO 9923748
49,990 2022
4.6
A
63 ATHENS C
IMO 1019761
50,170 2025
4.6
A
62 TORM STRENGTH
IMO 9836036
49,999 2019
4.6
A
61 TORM SPLENDID
IMO 9854791
49,932 2020
4.6
A
64 TORM INNOVATION
IMO 9602722
73,847 2013
4.6
A
65 CAPTAIN LEON
IMO 9831206
49,999 2018
4.6
A
66 NORD MINAMI
IMO 9883041
52,825 2020
4.6
A
67 TORM DIWATA
IMO 9683350
49,680 2014
4.7
A
68 TORM SUCCESS
IMO 9836048
49,976 2019
4.7
A
70 ARDMORE DAUNTLESS
IMO 9707388
37,764 2015
4.7
A
69 MANCHAC SUN
IMO 9724013
49,994 2016
4.7
A
71 PS NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9919577
52,853 2022
4.7
A
72 STAMATIA
IMO 9864332
49,999 2019
4.7
A
73 CHIOS STAR
IMO 9827566
50,506 2018
4.7
A
75 SILVER ELEANOR
IMO 9692301
49,746 2015
4.7
A
74 TORM DENISE
IMO 9702211
49,999 2015
4.7
A
76 SOLAR TINE
IMO 9898527
49,343 2021
4.7
A
78 FARIDA
IMO 9845099
55,604 2020
4.7
A
77 GOLDEN SUN
IMO 1018860
49,988 2024
4.7
A
79 TABLE BAY
IMO 9974979
50,000 2024
4.7
A
80 YASA SEAGULL
IMO 9619543
49,990 2017
4.8
A
81 PACIFIC AQUAMARINE
IMO 9994515
49,820 2025
4.8
A
82 CAPE TEMPEST
IMO 9407263
73,720 2008
4.8
A
84 BOXER
IMO 9814193
49,852 2019
4.8
A
83 ATLANTIC MARBLE
IMO 9798959
49,999 2018
4.8
A
85 CELSIUS PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9884837
50,299 2021
4.8
A
86 SEAEXPLORER
IMO 1014022
50,498 2025
4.8
A
87 ARDMORE SEAFOX
IMO 9708215
49,999 2015
4.8
A
89 LARGO CALIFORNIA
IMO 9843780
50,290 2019
4.8
A
88 SAVONETTA SUN
IMO 9911549
49,999 2022
4.8
A
90 DORIC COURAGE
IMO 9847451
49,910 2019
4.8
A
91 PRECIOUS BALBOA
IMO 9997244
49,948 2025
4.8
A
92 MARATHO
IMO 9979448
49,999 2025
4.9
A
93 SEAWAYS CREST
IMO 9387920
51,510 2009
4.9
A
95 TAKAROA SUN
IMO 9850202
49,849 2019
4.9
A
94 FPMC 34
IMO 9845166
49,781 2019
4.9
A
96 JAL DHVANI
IMO 1021180
50,667 2025
4.9
A
98 ELANDRA REDWOOD
IMO 9834337
49,999 2018
4.9
A
97 RENAD
IMO 9917816
55,202 2022
4.9
A
99 TORM SOLUTION
IMO 9836050
49,999 2019
4.9
A
100 SM OSPREY
IMO 9786231
50,035 2017
4.9
A
Page 2 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.