Most Emission-Efficient General Cargos
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
| # | Vessel | Size (DWT) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 |
SAGA SKY
IMO 9144354
|
47,034 | 1996 |
4.8
|
A |
| 103 |
OCEANA SKY
IMO 9189938
|
50,655 | 1998 |
4.8
|
A |
| 102 |
EAGLE ARROW
IMO 9529592
|
62,967 | 2011 |
4.8
|
A |
| 104 |
EIKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9794472
|
38,520 | 2017 |
4.8
|
A |
| 105 |
GOLD OAK
IMO 9806342
|
37,732 | 2017 |
4.8
|
A |
| 108 |
HOSANGER
IMO 9081801
|
50,211 | 1995 |
4.8
|
A |
| 107 |
CALYPSO.GR
IMO 9785134
|
37,865 | 2017 |
4.8
|
A |
| 106 |
ESTRELLA
IMO 9477270
|
50,448 | 2012 |
4.8
|
A |
| 109 |
SOUND PEARL
IMO 9452907
|
52,125 | 2011 |
4.8
|
A |
| 110 |
CHANNEL PEARL
IMO 9644550
|
50,633 | 2012 |
4.8
|
A |
| 111 |
POLSTEAM OKRA
IMO 9984819
|
37,592 | 2024 |
4.9
|
A |
| 112 |
POLAND PEARL
IMO 9731236
|
45,474 | 2015 |
4.9
|
A |
| 113 |
COSCO SHIPPING HONOR
IMO 9881653
|
62,013 | 2020 |
4.9
|
A |
| 115 |
AFRICAN PIPIT
IMO 9890903
|
37,636 | 2020 |
4.9
|
A |
| 114 |
JU FU
IMO 1072828
|
61,347 | 2025 |
4.9
|
A |
| 117 |
BERGE JUNGFRAU
IMO 9846304
|
37,683 | 2019 |
4.9
|
A |
| 116 |
COSCO SHIPPING GRACE
IMO 9928865
|
61,613 | 2021 |
4.9
|
A |
| 118 |
FERUSA R
IMO 9668556
|
37,429 | 2014 |
4.9
|
A |
| 119 |
SAGA FALCON
IMO 9613848
|
55,596 | 2012 |
4.9
|
A |
| 120 |
AFRICAN RAVEN
IMO 9700287
|
37,711 | 2014 |
4.9
|
A |
| 121 |
TATUNG
IMO 9811921
|
37,685 | 2018 |
4.9
|
A |
| 125 |
DEVBULK KAYA
IMO 9530711
|
40,527 | 2012 |
4.9
|
A |
| 124 |
SAGA DISCOVERY
IMO 9317418
|
46,618 | 2006 |
4.9
|
A |
| 123 |
AMBER CONFIDENCE
IMO 9866550
|
37,720 | 2020 |
4.9
|
A |
| 122 |
OPTIMANA
IMO 9253856
|
57,599 | 2003 |
4.9
|
A |
| 126 |
LOUISE
IMO 9470301
|
37,207 | 2012 |
4.9
|
A |
| 127 |
TUJU ARROW
IMO 9443920
|
72,863 | 2010 |
4.9
|
A |
| 128 |
CANADA PEARL
IMO 9659749
|
45,566 | 2014 |
5.0
|
A |
| 130 |
SAGA VOYAGER
IMO 9233454
|
46,882 | 2001 |
5.0
|
A |
| 129 |
SAGA ODYSSEY
IMO 9401788
|
46,500 | 2008 |
5.0
|
A |
| 131 |
POLSTEAM PILE
IMO 9971886
|
37,592 | 2024 |
5.0
|
A |
| 132 |
DRINA S
IMO 9635743
|
38,037 | 2012 |
5.0
|
A |
| 133 |
VELVET
IMO 9782651
|
37,324 | 2021 |
5.0
|
A |
| 134 |
BBC MARS
IMO 9947770
|
40,297 | 2022 |
5.0
|
A |
| 135 |
PUFFIN ARROW
IMO 9566605
|
62,967 | 2011 |
5.0
|
A |
| 137 |
STAR HARMONIA
IMO 9103130
|
46,600 | 1998 |
5.0
|
A |
| 136 |
HOYANGER
IMO 9100073
|
50,194 | 1995 |
5.0
|
A |
| 139 |
SAGA MONAL
IMO 9117739
|
56,801 | 1996 |
5.0
|
A |
| 138 |
GREEN HELSINKI
IMO 9976068
|
64,986 | 2023 |
5.0
|
A |
| 141 |
STAR KINN
IMO 9396141
|
49,850 | 2010 |
5.1
|
A |
| 140 |
STAR JAVA
IMO 9310513
|
44,692 | 2006 |
5.1
|
A |
| 142 |
SAGA FUTURE
IMO 9613836
|
55,596 | 2012 |
5.1
|
A |
| 143 |
POLSTEAM KOPROWO
IMO 9971862
|
37,592 | 2024 |
5.1
|
A |
| 144 |
STAR HANSA
IMO 9103128
|
46,428 | 1995 |
5.1
|
A |
| 148 |
UNI BLOSSOM
IMO 9816567
|
37,634 | 2018 |
5.1
|
A |
| 147 |
POLSTEAM LEBSKO
IMO 9971874
|
37,574 | 2024 |
5.1
|
A |
| 146 |
ADASUN
IMO 9747053
|
34,483 | 2017 |
5.1
|
A |
| 145 |
PANAMANA
IMO 9401805
|
58,022 | 2010 |
5.1
|
A |
| 150 |
POLSTEAM INSKO
IMO 9984833
|
37,630 | 2025 |
5.1
|
A |
| 149 |
STAR LYSEFJORD
IMO 9616840
|
50,728 | 2014 |
5.1
|
A |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.