Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#885 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
10.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+8% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 GLEN COVE
IMO 9414228
25,615 2008
10.4
D
852 SEYCHELLES PROGRESS
IMO 9298181
37,558 2005
10.4
D
853 MARIA M
IMO 9301885
34,999 2006
10.4
D
854 FAIRCHEM CONQUEST
IMO 9798648
21,176 2017
10.4
D
855 ACADIA PARK
IMO 9780548
19,996 2018
10.4
D
856 GAIA DESGAGNES
IMO 9739800
17,999 2018
10.4
D
857 NISEKO GALAXY
IMO 9804930
25,289 2020
10.4
D
858 OPEC VICTORY
IMO 9499486
19,992 2012
10.4
D
859 OCTONAUT
IMO 9340477
19,983 2007
10.4
D
860 CHEMSTAR SAPPHIRE
IMO 9804904
19,993 2019
10.5
D
861 SOLAR NAAMA
IMO 9887396
24,621 2021
10.5
D
862 CHEMICAL ENTERPRISE
IMO 9827475
15,945 2018
10.5
D
863 SEAVICTORY
IMO 9315783
46,700 2007
10.5
D
864 MARIE C
IMO 9749348
25,161 2014
10.5
D
865 MAGIC WAND
IMO 9379143
46,754 2007
10.5
D
866 MTM SINGAPORE
IMO 9477529
19,996 2011
10.5
D
867 ORIENTAL GERBERA
IMO 9924716
16,279 2022
10.5
D
868 OGINO PARK
IMO 9725873
19,992 2017
10.5
D
869 SW CAP FERRAT I
IMO 9231614
36,031 2002
10.5
D
870 SWAN ATLANTIC
IMO 9790464
19,998 2017
10.5
D
871 THUN LIDKOPING
IMO 9828974
18,684 2019
10.6
D
872 ORIENTAL SAKURA
IMO 9743746
16,090 2015
10.6
D
873 HALTI
IMO 9818278
17,993 2019
10.6
D
874 BOW VICTORY
IMO 9773179
21,193 2016
10.6
D
875 CHEM SPICA
IMO 9739264
25,268 2014
10.6
D
876 SONGA EAGLE
IMO 9388704
25,421 2008
10.6
D
877 GINGA LYNX
IMO 9442550
25,900 2009
10.6
D
878 MTM NORTH SOUND
IMO 9360946
19,874 2006
10.7
D
879 CHEM SIRIUS
IMO 9558397
19,986 2011
10.7
D
880 FAIRCHEM FALCON
IMO 9799642
19,952 2018
10.7
D
881 MOUNT KIBO
IMO 9470997
37,843 2010
10.7
D
882 ORIENTAL DAPHNE
IMO 9882736
16,267 2020
10.7
D
883 TERN ISLAND
IMO 9909649
15,024 2021
10.7
D
884 MEIZAN
IMO 9881940
19,913 2023
10.7
D
885 HYDE PARK
IMO 9725861
19,994 2017
10.7
D
886 FINNSTRAUM
IMO 9172222
16,028 1999
10.8
D
887 ALDEN
IMO 9733363
19,997 2016
10.8
D
888 ORLANDO
IMO 9420851
38,334 2009
10.8
D
889 CITY ISLAND
IMO 9360960
19,996 2007
10.8
D
890 MELDERSKIN
IMO 9737577
19,999 2016
10.8
D
891 STOLT QUETZAL
IMO 9376660
12,564 2009
10.8
D
892 CLEAN IMPERIAL
IMO 9376854
39,998 2009
10.8
D
893 TG ARIES
IMO 9485849
19,956 2012
10.9
D
894 NORDIC MARITA
IMO 9558402
19,909 2012
10.9
D
895 OLYMPIC SPIRIT
IMO 9327097
24,035 2005
10.9
D
896 DAMIANIA
IMO 9308235
20,768 2006
10.9
D
897 ALICE
IMO 9323792
37,320 2007
10.9
D
898 SERENE MONACO
IMO 9309629
19,999 2005
10.9
D
899 BALTIC SAPPHIRE
IMO 9443425
37,593 2009
10.9
D
900 ICHESIA M
IMO 9436678
40,429 2009
10.9
D
Page 18 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.