Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#72 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
4.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-68% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
50 COSCO SHIPPING ZHUO YUE
IMO 9872157
61,991 2019
4.3
A
52 ELISABETH OLDENDORFF
IMO 9717656
38,600 2015
4.3
A
53 DELOS DAWN
IMO 9363675
52,224 2008
4.3
A
54 BAY PEARL
IMO 9460801
51,703 2011
4.3
A
56 GREEN NAGOYA
IMO 1027366
64,998 2024
4.3
A
55 DEVBULK DENIZ
IMO 9758301
41,500 2020
4.3
A
57 WANG FU
IMO 9998066
61,676 2024
4.3
A
58 ZHONG YUAN HAI YUN KAI TUO
IMO 9837640
62,051 2018
4.4
A
59 COSCO SHIPPING FOUNTAIN
IMO 9928891
61,495 2022
4.4
A
60 THOR FEARLESS
IMO 9317341
54,881 2005
4.4
A
62 PROVIDANA
IMO 9380788
58,022 2007
4.4
A
61 GREEN KEMI
IMO 9976044
64,986 2023
4.4
A
63 BBC CERES
IMO 9972490
40,600 2024
4.4
A
64 OKIANA
IMO 9253868
57,599 2004
4.4
A
65 HERBERT
IMO 9931551
61,762 2022
4.4
A
66 DEVBULK DAMLA
IMO 9711717
37,322 2015
4.5
A
67 AMERICA PEARL
IMO 9659751
45,556 2014
4.5
A
68 COSCO SHIPPING PENG BO
IMO 9928920
61,576 2023
4.5
A
70 PIPIT ARROW
IMO 9552898
62,980 2012
4.5
A
69 GREEN KOTKA
IMO 9976056
64,986 2023
4.5
A
71 COSCO SHIPPING SINCERE
IMO 9928877
61,641 2022
4.5
A
73 POSIDANA
IMO 9371086
58,022 2008
4.5
A
72 COSCO SHIPPING VISION
IMO 9881677
61,942 2021
4.5
A
74 BBC APOLLO
IMO 9972488
40,565 2023
4.5
A
75 ZHONG YUAN HAI YUN JIN QU
IMO 9846495
62,045 2019
4.6
A
76 MANTA NIGAR
IMO 9749843
34,391 2016
4.6
A
78 BBC PLUTO
IMO 1020459
40,459 2025
4.6
A
77 SAGA FORTUNE
IMO 9644524
56,023 2012
4.6
A
79 COSCO SHIPPING FAN RONG
IMO 9928906
61,537 2022
4.6
A
80 IVS PHINDA
IMO 9700940
37,720 2014
4.6
A
81 GREEN AANEKOSKI
IMO 9976082
64,986 2023
4.6
A
83 LUNARA
IMO 9443126
33,709 2010
4.6
A
82 COSCO SHIPPING CHANG SHENG
IMO 9928918
61,567 2022
4.6
A
84 SAGA FLORA
IMO 9502348
55,807 2018
4.6
A
85 SAGA FJORD
IMO 9613862
55,596 2013
4.7
A
86 IRVINE BAY
IMO 9682928
37,920 2014
4.7
A
87 SAGA FRIGG
IMO 9613850
55,596 2013
4.7
A
88 GREEN ITAJAI
IMO 9976446
64,998 2024
4.7
A
89 DEVBULK SARE
IMO 9544152
40,445 2012
4.7
A
90 POLSTEAM RUDNO
IMO 9984821
37,630 2025
4.7
A
91 SPANACO ADVENTURE
IMO 9014078
47,076 1994
4.7
A
93 COSCO SHIPPING JIN XIU
IMO 9872169
62,003 2019
4.7
A
92 STRAIT PEARL
IMO 9607576
50,630 2011
4.7
A
94 BBC SATURN
IMO 9932127
40,255 2022
4.7
A
97 SSI ENDEAVOUR
IMO 9883053
37,910 2020
4.7
A
98 BEATRICE
IMO 9865245
39,278 2019
4.7
A
96 STAR TOSCANA
IMO 9452139
51,674 2012
4.7
A
95 ORION
IMO 9495935
51,679 2012
4.7
A
99 SAGA SKY
IMO 9144354
47,034 1996
4.8
A
100 EAGLE ARROW
IMO 9529592
62,967 2011
4.8
A
Page 2 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.