Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#303 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-37% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 558 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
300 ULTRA MARGAY
IMO 9871206
81,921 2020
3.0
A
302 MINIMATA
IMO 9952464
82,202 2023
3.0
A
304 LOWLANDS TEAL
IMO 9853060
95,823 2020
3.0
A
303 BTG ULRIKEN
IMO 9887346
82,456 2020
3.0
A
305 SAKIZAYA HERO
IMO 9780134
80,962 2016
3.0
A
309 FJ IRIS
IMO 9958884
82,792 2023
3.0
A
308 OPAL WEALTH
IMO 1016496
64,241 2025
3.0
A
307 KYPROS BRAVERY
IMO 9694490
77,997 2015
3.0
A
306 GERASIMOS
IMO 9510333
82,153 2011
3.0
A
313 STAR THETIS
IMO 9964895
66,327 2025
3.0
A
312 NORDIC QINNGUA
IMO 9884978
95,709 2021
3.0
A
314 ETG HAYATE
IMO 9919967
81,957 2022
3.0
A
311 EMERALD SHENGSI
IMO 9981300
85,594 2024
3.0
A
310 MYSTIC
IMO 9421831
169,879 2008
3.0
A
316 ELATOS
IMO 1030856
82,050 2025
3.0
A
315 PEDHOULAS CEDRUS
IMO 9758416
81,802 2018
3.0
A
323 MEA MARE
IMO 9976630
64,035 2024
3.0
A
322 SARAH
IMO 9841172
81,112 2018
3.0
A
324 NORDIC SIKU
IMO 9895800
95,758 2021
3.0
A
321 ORMOS
IMO 9837298
81,944 2019
3.0
A
320 GEMMA
IMO 9602784
313,049 2012
3.0
A
319 BTG APO
IMO 9887358
82,442 2021
3.0
A
318 SAKIZAYA ZEST
IMO 9913030
82,501 2022
3.0
A
317 MANDY
IMO 9582831
180,371 2010
3.0
A
328 GLORIOUS SKY
IMO 9582946
81,893 2015
3.0
A
327 SEAGEM
IMO 9758375
81,714 2019
3.0
A
329 VELOS LIBRA
IMO 9710799
77,134 2014
3.0
A
326 ATHENS
IMO 9618824
180,012 2012
3.0
A
330 NORDIC SANNGIJUQ
IMO 9895795
95,758 2021
3.0
A
325 VOLUTINA
IMO 9929338
82,408 2022
3.0
A
333 SAKIZAYA STAR
IMO 9861316
82,516 2020
3.0
A
332 BW OSAKA
IMO 9836567
81,796 2020
3.0
A
334 NAVIOS HERAKLES I
IMO 9852937
82,036 2019
3.0
A
331 AOM ELENA
IMO 9970246
82,550 2024
3.0
A
337 SASEBO ECO
IMO 9675456
77,888 2014
3.0
A
336 BTG FUJI
IMO 9731846
81,069 2016
3.0
A
335 STAR CALYPSO
IMO 9634842
81,918 2014
3.0
A
338 KATAGALAN ACE
IMO 9950521
82,680 2023
3.0
A
339 MG HAMMOND
IMO 9748045
84,858 2016
3.0
A
342 EPIC RADIANCE
IMO 9970234
82,555 2024
3.0
A
341 LOWLANDS SKY
IMO 9933262
82,281 2023
3.0
A
340 NORD ACE
IMO 1027330
87,404 2024
3.0
A
343 AURORA BOREALIS
IMO 9957608
82,315 2023
3.0
A
350 SCION CHARLOTTE
IMO 1023982
82,249 2025
3.1
A
349 LADY I
IMO 9336610
75,356 2007
3.1
A
348 MSC CARINA
IMO 9625944
104,183 2013
3.1
A
347 SAKIZAYA MIRACLE
IMO 9768019
81,668 2017
3.1
A
346 CHRISTINA B
IMO 9304162
77,053 2007
3.1
A
345 ANNA G.
IMO 9701310
81,004 2014
3.1
A
344 ARIETTA LILY
IMO 9727479
81,773 2017
3.1
A
Page 7 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.