Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#546 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-31% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 631 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

120
Q4
134
'27 Q1
86
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
135
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,937 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,866 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,674 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,674 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,025 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,141
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,999–11,933M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,141 of 1,141 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
504 JOLANDA
IMO 9724867
180,579 2015
3.3
A
501 LAURENCE FRANCOISE
IMO 9827061
81,772 2019
3.3
A
499 ALBERTITO
IMO 9748423
61,301 2016
3.3
A
503 YILDIZLAR 4
IMO 9502568
49,775 2008
3.3
A
502 YU XIAO FENG
IMO 9606431
75,398 2012
3.3
A
511 ASTRO SIRIUS
IMO 9848077
63,562 2019
3.3
A
510 MAIA
IMO 9422938
82,193 2009
3.3
A
509 AP DUBROVNIK
IMO 9952660
82,249 2023
3.3
A
508 BBG HECHI
IMO 9929039
82,037 2022
3.3
A
507 LIVORNO
IMO 9855549
81,651 2019
3.3
A
512 JING LU HAI
IMO 9747558
77,927 2015
3.3
A
506 TORO
IMO 9443009
76,636 2008
3.3
A
513 PORT OSHIMA
IMO 9932804
64,624 2022
3.3
A
517 PISTI
IMO 9893503
81,737 2021
3.3
A
520 SEACON SHANGHAI
IMO 9847889
80,811 2019
3.3
A
516 ATROTOS HERACLES
IMO 9668879
81,922 2014
3.3
A
523 NEFELI
IMO 9317468
77,171 2009
3.3
A
522 HAMPTON OCEAN
IMO 9798844
80,979 2017
3.3
A
521 NORD POLARIS
IMO 9728198
81,791 2016
3.3
A
515 LOWLANDS FREEDOM
IMO 9942158
64,481 2023
3.3
A
519 CHASSELAS
IMO 9840506
81,758 2019
3.3
A
514 MONDIAL COSMOS
IMO 9801196
81,611 2017
3.3
A
518 ATHINA II
IMO 9724192
82,014 2015
3.3
A
525 VOLUTINA
IMO 9929338
82,408 2022
3.4
A
524 KYOTO STAR
IMO 9740811
84,956 2016
3.4
A
526 SPAR MAIA
IMO 1015155
63,550 2024
3.4
A
530 KEY FRONTIER
IMO 9454292
80,679 2011
3.4
A
529 BBG GRACE
IMO 9702704
81,952 2015
3.4
A
532 IONIC KIBOU
IMO 9582556
81,889 2015
3.4
A
528 ARIANA
IMO 9828297
81,011 2019
3.4
A
531 MARTINE
IMO 9411537
86,949 2009
3.4
A
527 THREE SASKIAS
IMO 9689811
81,094 2014
3.4
A
537 MARINE GLORY
IMO 9606754
114,047 2014
3.4
A
539 STAR MARIA
IMO 9401489
82,598 2007
3.4
A
536 MSXT THALIA
IMO 9929326
85,204 2022
3.4
A
535 XING FU HAI
IMO 9949302
85,038 2022
3.4
A
534 YASA MARS
IMO 9848120
61,081 2019
3.4
A
533 DIAMOND POWER
IMO 9566590
107,235 2013
3.4
A
538 SFERA
IMO 9304576
76,801 2006
3.4
A
543 ANNA-DOROTHEA
IMO 9482213
55,646 2008
3.4
A
544 DARYA MA
IMO 9591674
81,874 2011
3.4
A
542 ASTRO VEGA
IMO 9720299
63,008 2015
3.4
A
545 S SAMBA
IMO 9712486
84,867 2013
3.4
A
541 ROYAL PEARL
IMO 9941972
63,535 2023
3.4
A
540 ASIAN ETERNITY
IMO 9991472
64,683 2024
3.4
A
550 AQUAGEMINI
IMO 9757010
60,238 2016
3.4
A
549 HSL NASSAU
IMO 9802310
63,805 2020
3.4
A
548 POMONE
IMO 9926130
82,247 2021
3.4
A
547 ULTRA OCELOT
IMO 9871191
81,901 2020
3.4
A
546 CL GANJIANG
IMO 9953327
64,747 2023
3.4
A
Page 11 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.