Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#76 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
-60% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,477 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
51 MSC SIMONA
IMO 9962615
202,562 2024
3.8
A
53 MSC OLBIA
IMO 9987299
16,000 TEU 2024
3.8
A
52 MSC ELISABETTA
IMO 9954747
15,500 TEU 2025
3.8
A
54 ONE FORWARD
IMO 9936422
15,500 TEU 2024
3.8
A
57 MSC ALESSIA
IMO 9987330
16,000 TEU 2025
3.8
A
56 MSC THAIS
IMO 9957347
15,600 TEU 2021
3.8
A
55 MSC SIENA
IMO 9987275
16,000 TEU 2024
3.8
A
58 HMM DUBLIN
IMO 9863314
23,000 TEU 2020
3.8
A
60 ONE FANTASTIC
IMO 9936381
15,500 TEU 2023
3.8
A
59 MSC ISABELLA
IMO 9839272
22,000 TEU 2019
3.8
A
62 ALVA MAERSK
IMO 9961817
16,592 TEU 2025
3.8
A
61 CMA CGM PALAIS ROYAL
IMO 9839181
22,448 TEU 2020
3.8
A
63 CMA CGM COBALT
IMO 9996680
147,196 2025
3.9
A
64 MARIT MAERSK
IMO 9632167
18,340 TEU 2011
3.9
A
66 HMM HAMBURG
IMO 9863338
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
65 ONE INTELLIGENCE
IMO 9933121
24,000 TEU 2023
3.9
A
67 MSC FLORA
IMO 9978937
11,400 TEU 2022
3.9
A
69 OOCL FELIXSTOWE
IMO 9922512
23,000 TEU 2023
3.9
A
68 HMM ST PETERSBURG
IMO 9868364
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
70 MSC AUDREY
IMO 9540065
15,128 TEU 2023
3.9
A
71 ONE FUTURE
IMO 9936393
15,500 TEU 2024
3.9
A
72 ALETTE MAERSK
IMO 9948774
16,592 TEU 2024
3.9
A
74 CMA CGM JACQUES SAADE
IMO 9839179
22,448 TEU 2020
3.9
A
73 HMM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9868338
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
75 MSC CALYPSO
IMO 9932036
15,264 TEU 2023
3.9
A
77 OOCL PIRAEUS
IMO 9908097
23,000 TEU 2023
3.9
A
76 HMM LE HAVRE
IMO 9868314
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
79 BEIJING MAERSK
IMO 9984572
17,148 TEU 2025
3.9
A
78 ONE STORK
IMO 9784788
14,000 TEU 2018
3.9
A
82 ONE TRIBUTE
IMO 9769295
20,170 TEU 2017
3.9
A
84 MSC ILARIA
IMO 9962586
202,562 2024
3.9
A
81 MSC CARMELITA
IMO 9946879
16,000 TEU 2024
3.9
A
80 HMM GDANSK
IMO 9863326
23,000 TEU 2020
3.9
A
83 MSC ELENOIRE
IMO 9962603
202,562 2024
3.9
A
86 MSC FATMA
IMO 9927251
14,812 TEU 2022
3.9
A
85 MSC MAURA
IMO 9962536
202,562 2024
3.9
A
87 MSC BIANCA SILVIA
IMO 9930935
15,500 TEU 2023
3.9
A
88 ONE MEISHAN
IMO 9805465
14,000 TEU 2018
4.0
A
89 HMM OSLO
IMO 9868326
23,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
90 HMM HELSINKI
IMO 9863340
23,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
94 CMA CGM ARCTIC
IMO 9867841
15,128 TEU 2022
4.0
A
93 ONE TRUST
IMO 9769283
20,170 TEU 2017
4.0
A
92 ONE TRIUMPH
IMO 9769271
20,170 TEU 2017
4.0
A
91 HMM COPENHAGEN
IMO 9863302
23,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
95 HMM SOUTHAMPTON
IMO 9868340
23,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
96 MSC GRACE
IMO 9987366
16,000 TEU 2025
4.0
A
99 ONE TRUTH
IMO 9773210
20,150 TEU 2017
4.0
A
98 ROTTERDAM EXPRESS
IMO 9943891
23,660 TEU 2025
4.0
A
97 OOCL ZEEBRUGGE
IMO 9908140
24,000 TEU 2020
4.0
A
100 ANGELICA MAERSK
IMO 9948798
16,592 TEU 2021
4.0
A
Page 2 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.