Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,010 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
10.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+15% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 HOUYOSHI PARK
IMO 9725847
19,998 2016
10.7
D
1002 TERN OCEAN
IMO 9747986
14,827 2017
10.7
D
1003 ACADIAN
IMO 9298715
37,515 2005
10.7
D
1004 SEYCHELLES PIONEER
IMO 9255517
37,500 2005
10.7
D
1005 SCARLET RAY
IMO 9799654
19,974 2020
10.7
D
1006 TEAL RAY
IMO 9838668
19,999 2019
10.7
D
1007 BOW TIGER
IMO 9989223
25,917 2024
10.7
D
1008 ORIENTAL TULIP
IMO 9890549
16,268 2020
10.7
D
1009 CHEM TAURUS
IMO 9477505
19,961 2010
10.8
D
1010 MTM VANCOUVER
IMO 9867607
22,344 2019
10.8
D
1011 SWAN PACIFIC
IMO 9749805
19,997 2016
10.8
D
1012 SAPPHIRE
IMO 9443425
37,593 2009
10.8
D
1013 NISEKO GALAXY
IMO 9804930
25,289 2020
10.8
D
1014 GINOSTRA M
IMO 1021673
18,639 2024
10.8
D
1015 CHEMICAL ENTERPRISE
IMO 9827475
15,945 2018
10.8
D
1016 STOLT SPRAY
IMO 9168611
22,201 2000
10.8
D
1017 FINNSTRAUM
IMO 9172222
16,028 1999
10.8
D
1018 CAPTAIN M. KYRIAKOU
IMO 1025411
18,330 2025
10.9
D
1019 MAC TOKYO
IMO 9343778
19,998 2006
10.9
D
1020 CHEM COBALT
IMO 9740770
19,990 2016
10.9
D
1021 STOLT ACHIEVEMENT
IMO 9124469
37,141 1999
10.9
D
1022 GINGA LYNX
IMO 9442550
25,900 2009
10.9
D
1023 MAREX NINA
IMO 1027897
12,263 2025
10.9
D
1024 KITIKMEOT W.
IMO 9421219
19,983 2010
10.9
D
1025 MINERVA LEO
IMO 9723289
39,070 2015
10.9
D
1026 AMELIA
IMO 9624768
21,287 2011
10.9
D
1027 VARI TRADER
IMO 9800025
19,808 2018
10.9
D
1028 STOLT INVENTION
IMO 9102100
36,733 1997
11.0
D
1029 CHEM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9705756
19,996 2015
11.0
D
1030 ATA VOYAGER
IMO 9408360
9,600 2009
11.0
D
1031 SWAN ATLANTIC
IMO 9790464
19,998 2017
11.0
D
1032 REBECCA SCHULTE
IMO 9576753
25,620 2011
11.0
D
1033 CHEM SIRIUS
IMO 9558397
19,986 2011
11.0
D
1034 CHEMICAL HUNTER
IMO 9758789
16,081 2015
11.0
D
1035 GAIA DESGAGNES
IMO 9739800
17,999 2018
11.1
D
1036 GULF PETROLEUM 4
IMO 9439345
13,006 2009
11.1
D
1037 NYMPH THETIS
IMO 9232369
17,427 2000
11.1
D
1038 SHAMROCK JUPITER
IMO 9416082
19,837 2009
11.1
D
1039 SONGA EAGLE
IMO 9388704
25,421 2008
11.2
D
1040 CITY ISLAND
IMO 9360960
19,996 2007
11.2
D
1041 EVA HANSA
IMO 9985980
19,945 2023
11.2
D
1042 EASLINE GUANGZHOU
IMO 9249594
19,924 2001
11.2
D
1043 GINGA COUGAR
IMO 9321861
26,180 2005
11.2
D
1044 ORIS HELGA
IMO 9483619
7,739 2008
11.2
D
1045 SAPPHIRE A
IMO 9407081
19,701 2008
11.2
D
1046 LILA EVIA
IMO 9330771
19,959 2006
11.3
D
1047 MED PACIFIC
IMO 9461934
26,234 2012
11.3
D
1048 GULHOLMEN
IMO 9435703
16,817 2007
11.3
D
1049 MELATI 7
IMO 9172272
31,960 2000
11.3
D
1050 NO.5 OCEAN PIONEER
IMO 9409510
19,993 2009
11.3
D
Page 21 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.