Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,395 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-13% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1343 AKOUR II
IMO 9454084
58,831 2010
4.0
B
1352 FU RONG FENG
IMO 9523184
75,444 2011
4.0
B
1355 AQUAHOLIC
IMO 9363089
83,730 2008
4.0
B
1354 XIN HAI TONG 807
IMO 9624122
81,752 2013
4.0
B
1353 XIN HAI TONG 808
IMO 9669330
76,079 2010
4.0
B
1358 XIN HAI TONG 801
IMO 9591844
81,680 2012
4.0
B
1361 STAR PISCES
IMO 9715854
60,916 2015
4.0
B
1357 ASTRO VEGA
IMO 9720299
63,008 2015
4.0
B
1363 GREAT SHANG
IMO 9766906
64,942 2016
4.0
B
1362 DENSA FLAMINGO
IMO 9603283
82,670 2010
4.0
B
1356 BERGE CATHERINE
IMO 9856309
63,654 2020
4.0
B
1359 INES CORRADO
IMO 9602772
81,271 2012
4.0
B
1360 G PACIFIC
IMO 9494010
58,114 2010
4.0
B
1364 PERSEAS
IMO 9650638
75,033 2013
4.1
B
1365 ANGELIC PEACE
IMO 9250177
75,007 1999
4.1
B
1371 ABDULLAH
IMO 9745598
58,068 2015
4.1
B
1370 STEFANOS T
IMO 9583744
80,499 2011
4.1
B
1372 CHRISTINE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9537898
93,077 2010
4.1
B
1369 ASIAN SUMMIT
IMO 9725005
62,466 2017
4.1
B
1368 PSARROS D
IMO 9855642
81,961 2019
4.1
B
1367 TIGER HEBEI
IMO 9712204
63,483 2015
4.1
B
1366 HF ZHOUSHAN
IMO 9268992
75,606 2004
4.1
B
1376 SUN VIL II
IMO 9643178
56,042 2013
4.1
B
1375 EPIC SERENITY
IMO 9935442
82,310 2022
4.1
B
1377 JAL MURARI
IMO 9849564
81,993 2019
4.1
B
1374 TOMINI DESTINY
IMO 9718155
63,590 2017
4.1
B
1379 XIN HAI TONG 63
IMO 9592721
57,023 2011
4.1
B
1378 YASA JUPITER
IMO 9848132
61,077 2019
4.1
B
1373 ZHENG RONG
IMO 9593828
81,793 2013
4.1
B
1383 HALONA
IMO 9286920
75,776 2005
4.1
B
1382 PHILHOKUSAI
IMO 9549451
61,197 2022
4.1
B
1381 FEDERAL TOKORO
IMO 9725445
55,543 2015
4.1
B
1380 STAR ANGELINA
IMO 9310630
82,981 2006
4.1
B
1384 POPI S
IMO 9527233
80,337 2012
4.1
B
1386 PAN IMPERIAL
IMO 9699361
63,567 2016
4.1
C
1389 AGRAFA
IMO 9947304
63,564 2024
4.1
C
1392 ULTRA INFINITY
IMO 9767481
61,188 2014
4.1
C
1388 TAHITI ONE
IMO 9597032
81,291 2012
4.1
C
1394 BUNA ARROW
IMO 9687071
55,967 2014
4.1
C
1393 WECO HOLLI
IMO 9929699
61,275 2020
4.1
C
1387 W-SKY
IMO 9476666
92,929 2011
4.1
C
1385 VIENNA
IMO 9403205
58,736 2009
4.1
C
1391 GRETKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9681962
80,444 2015
4.1
C
1390 SEVA
IMO 9336000
76,948 2007
4.1
C
1400 TIGER LILY
IMO 9744984
81,886 2016
4.1
C
1399 AVAX
IMO 9289312
75,399 2006
4.1
C
1398 KIRA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9867566
81,290 2020
4.1
C
1397 GLAFKOS
IMO 9696448
63,519 2016
4.1
C
1396 XIN SHUN
IMO 9252199
75,846 2002
4.1
C
1395 KONSTANTINOS D
IMO 9972608
63,516 2024
4.1
C
Page 28 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.