Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#177 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-44% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 445C 450D 294E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 174 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

33
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
38
'27 Q4
32
'28 Q1
29
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,081 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 980 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 980 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

271
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€694–1,709M
capex range, top measure per vessel (271 of 271 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.8
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
152 DEE4 LARCH
IMO 9697909
49,737 2016
5.4
A
153 SILVER ELEANOR
IMO 9692301
49,746 2015
5.4
A
151 YASA ALBATROSS
IMO 9857212
50,215 2019
5.4
A
155 TORM DENISE
IMO 9702211
49,999 2015
5.4
A
154 STENA IMPERATOR
IMO 9797383
49,690 2017
5.4
A
156 OPTIMUS
IMO 9835044
49,999 2019
5.4
A
158 SEAWAYS FRONTIER
IMO 9332303
49,999 2007
5.4
A
157 GULF MUTTRAH
IMO 9381835
46,556 2009
5.4
A
159 AL AMERAT
IMO 9405851
51,022 2008
5.5
A
160 NORD HARMONY
IMO 9870719
50,494 2020
5.5
A
161 SOLAR LAI FONG
IMO 9907809
49,358 2021
5.5
A
164 HIGH LOYALTY
IMO 9681857
49,990 2015
5.5
A
163 STI BROOKLYN
IMO 9706841
49,990 2015
5.5
A
162 DANK SILVER
IMO 9718806
49,734 2016
5.5
A
166 FATIMAH
IMO 9917830
55,202 2022
5.5
A
165 PTI NILE
IMO 9747338
49,999 2014
5.5
A
167 TORM DEBORAH
IMO 9683386
49,680 2015
5.5
A
169 ECO YOSEMITE PARK
IMO 9877573
49,999 2020
5.5
A
168 VELOS LEO
IMO 9381768
49,999 2008
5.5
A
170 NAVIG8 GOAL
IMO 9853216
49,770 2019
5.5
A
173 ELKA ELEFSIS
IMO 9705914
51,000 2015
5.5
A
172 LARGO EVOLUTION
IMO 9687942
49,750 2015
5.5
A
171 TORM DULCE
IMO 9682394
49,746 2014
5.5
A
174 ARDMORE SEAHAWK
IMO 9708239
49,999 2015
5.5
A
175 STENA IMPECCABLE
IMO 9693020
49,737 2017
5.5
A
176 BASSET
IMO 9858060
49,875 2019
5.5
A
179 ECO LOS ANGELES
IMO 9877559
50,185 2020
5.5
A
178 ZANDOLIE
IMO 9893163
50,494 2021
5.5
A
177 DRACO
IMO 9801562
50,067 2021
5.5
A
181 CHASE OCEAN
IMO 9290660
46,959 2006
5.5
A
180 YASA SWAN
IMO 9857248
50,215 2019
5.5
A
182 ECO JOSHUA PARK
IMO 9877585
49,999 2020
5.5
A
184 SEAPROMISE
IMO 9934125
50,394 2022
5.6
A
186 YASA PELICAN
IMO 9857224
50,215 2019
5.6
A
183 ST HELEN
IMO 9934151
50,226 2022
5.6
A
185 SEA LA BELLE
IMO 9380374
49,995 2008
5.6
A
190 YASA HAWK
IMO 9619531
49,990 2017
5.6
A
189 PYXIS THETA
IMO 9657064
51,462 2013
5.6
A
188 SOLAR RUO YUN
IMO 9907811
49,361 2021
5.6
A
187 NORD ELEGANCE
IMO 9870707
50,415 2020
5.6
A
192 HAFNIA TOURMALINE
IMO 9753698
49,513 2014
5.6
A
191 SEAWAYS GRACE
IMO 9337511
49,999 2008
5.6
A
193 PACIFIC JULIA
IMO 9772046
66,269 2017
5.6
A
194 STI MIRACLE
IMO 9833591
49,999 2020
5.6
A
196 ATLANTIC MARBLE
IMO 9798959
49,999 2018
5.6
A
197 CHEMROAD SIRIUS
IMO 9757979
35,757 2018
5.6
A
195 AINAZI
IMO 9323405
52,606 2008
5.6
A
200 RIVIERA
IMO 9384019
51,218 2008
5.7
A
199 NAVIG8 EXCELLENCE
IMO 9976886
49,160 2025
5.7
A
198 ELANDRA FJORD
IMO 9482550
51,408 2011
5.7
A
Page 4 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.