Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#763 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-26% greener
C

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 266 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 858 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

386
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (386 of 386 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
752 ESTRELLA
IMO 9696761
106,282 2014
3.7
C
751 SEA SAPPHIRE
IMO 9935600
156,669 2022
3.7
C
755 TORM GLORIA
IMO 9461843
119,456 2011
3.7
C
754 SEARANGER
IMO 9759800
114,055 2017
3.7
C
753 SKS DRIVA
IMO 9428970
119,456 2010
3.7
C
756 RAN DF
IMO 9953470
114,575 2023
3.7
C
757 STI SELATAR
IMO 9729245
109,999 2017
3.7
C
762 HAFNIA EXECUTIVE
IMO 9735622
74,431 2016
3.7
C
761 NAVIG8 PROVIDENCE
IMO 9947378
109,995 2023
3.7
C
760 OCEANUS
IMO 9337004
150,265 2008
3.7
C
759 PACIFIC PEARL
IMO 9893072
113,306 2021
3.7
C
758 POLAR ACE
IMO 9721504
109,999 2018
3.7
C
764 DUBAI BRILLIANCE
IMO 9422550
115,617 2011
3.8
C
763 ALDEBARAN
IMO 9853400
112,802 2019
3.8
C
768 PACIFIC RUBY
IMO 9893034
113,306 2021
3.8
C
765 ELANDRA GULF
IMO 9749544
113,364 2016
3.8
C
771 MARCILIO DIAS
IMO 9453858
157,055 2015
3.8
C
770 ANGELONIA
IMO 9901051
111,039 2021
3.8
C
769 KWK EXCELSUS
IMO 9728411
114,716 2016
3.8
C
767 MARATHON TS
IMO 9737371
113,651 2017
3.8
C
766 NEW DISCOVERY
IMO 9269075
159,199 2003
3.8
C
772 KMARIN REASON
IMO 9683087
109,483 2017
3.8
C
773 HANOVER SQUARE
IMO 9783992
114,366 2019
3.8
C
777 MARAN POSEIDON
IMO 9402926
158,267 2010
3.8
C
776 SEACHARM
IMO 9773765
112,179 2018
3.8
C
775 STI LAUREN
IMO 9696711
109,999 2015
3.8
C
774 STI SOLACE
IMO 9708588
109,999 2013
3.8
C
779 KAPSALI
IMO 9587312
158,546 2011
3.8
C
778 MEDITERRANEAN VOYAGER
IMO 9857858
115,165 2018
3.8
C
780 DUBAI BEAUTY
IMO 9422548
115,382 2011
3.8
C
783 MARATHI
IMO 9772357
149,991 2018
3.8
C
782 MILTON SANTOS
IMO 9453884
157,055 2017
3.8
C
784 STI CONNAUGHT
IMO 9697600
109,999 2013
3.8
C
781 STI STABILITY
IMO 9712840
109,999 2016
3.8
C
785 STELLATA
IMO 9732230
109,991 2016
3.8
C
787 AMAZON FORTITUDE
IMO 9820544
72,836 2018
3.8
C
790 SEATRIBUTE
IMO 9857468
111,932 2020
3.8
C
789 ALMI HORIZON
IMO 9579494
157,787 2011
3.8
C
788 NISSOS DELOS
IMO 9592305
115,690 2012
3.8
C
786 HAFNIA TAGUS
IMO 9766205
74,151 2017
3.8
C
791 STEMNITSA
IMO 9693070
109,999 2013
3.8
C
792 FRONT JAGUAR
IMO 9703332
109,900 2016
3.8
C
796 PROMETHEUS ENERGY
IMO 9801988
114,459 2019
3.8
C
795 AGRARI
IMO 9389083
107,009 2009
3.8
C
794 SUEZ PROTOPIA
IMO 9380893
160,391 2008
3.8
C
793 STARLING
IMO 9737527
74,033 2016
3.8
C
800 SEA PUMA
IMO 9802176
114,560 2019
3.8
C
799 PENELOPE
IMO 9941726
114,763 2023
3.8
C
798 MACHADO DE ASSIS
IMO 9453872
157,055 2016
3.8
C
797 STI SUPREME
IMO 9719721
109,999 2016
3.8
C
Page 16 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.